314:
As it was not possible for the people in the middle ages to imagine that the earth is not flat, it is just as impossible for the modern day inquisitors in the cosmology to accept the idea that . It is just these limited minds of the inquisitors which have been suppressing the multi-level cosmological
369:
Yes. Seriously now, the point is that we are deleting this article because it's not a notable theory, and not because we believe it's wrong. If this theory in the future gets a lot of media or academic attention (either by being correct or for being notably wrong), we would have an article about it.
287:
Notice to the wikipedia inquisitors: "Yes delete this article. The Earth is Flat! The
Universe is Flat! Everybody knows that the universe is Flat and one-level! Burn Mark Hucko at stake!" What are you afraid of? That the universe is not flat and one-level? No it isn't. Let it stay, let anybody
355:
Number of valid ideas that have been ignored by the mainstream since 1500 A.D.: 37. Number of invalid, foolish, or crackpot ideas that have been ignored by the mainstream since 1500 A.D.: 3,213,756. One would think that someone who dabbles in cosmology understands the
315:
model and who have been erasing it from the search engines and from the
Knowledge (XXG). Just because the earth is flat - in their minds - it must be flat also in the minds of the rest of the world.
169:
122:
129:
Sounds like borderline nonsense, and is a non-notable alternate theory with no significant uptake. Link makes my eyes bleed. More articles to be added to this Afd shortly.
224:(not the content of that article but the subject... "MEST" is very probably a Scientology trademark or something, since they abuse copyright law so gleefully). —
217:
386:. We request authors to place a copyright release notice on their website. In this case the author has placed the deletion request - at the bottom of
95:
90:
99:
269:
is actually a linguist, not a cosmologist. If this is what he personally believes then that's for him, but there's nothing about it on google. nn.
82:
17:
337:
216:, clearly original research. This was actually a declined Article for Creation, so the author should have known better. (
425:
36:
410:
394:
376:
364:
344:
325:
298:
273:
256:
242:
208:
186:
176:
163:
151:
133:
64:
182:
This appears to be original research. The only source given is a personal webpage. Also, it's basically nonsense.
407:
86:
424:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
160:
148:
130:
78:
70:
156:
144:
140:
403:
361:
341:
49:
333:
232:
221:
58:
295:
270:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
402:
as per author request and community consensus. Also deleted the other associated articles. --
250:- I loved the theory :) , but Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for such original research. --
351:
201:
372:
252:
387:
357:
205:
173:
391:
322:
225:
183:
116:
266:
218:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for creation/2007-02-03#Multi-Level
Universe theory
288:
SCIENTIFICALLY prove that it is not correct. Give
Columbus a chance!
418:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
170:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Multi-level universe
56:
and the closing comments at the bottom of this debate. -
220:) Some of this is probably Scientology copyvio, compare
112:
108:
104:
53:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
428:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:From the main article (something to consider?):
8:
168:I'm reproducing the nominator's comment at
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
338:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (science)
332:This discussion has been added as a
24:
1:
411:21:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
395:13:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
377:10:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
365:07:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
345:00:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
326:07:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
299:17:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
274:17:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
257:14:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
243:11:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
209:11:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
187:11:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
177:11:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
164:11:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
152:11:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
134:11:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
65:10:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
445:
336:to the proposed guideline
159:has joined our tea party.
147:is being added elsewhere.
360:of hypothesis testing. ~
421:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
311:MODERN-DAY INQUISITION
204:covers this, I think.
79:Multi-level cosmology
71:Multi-level cosmology
157:Multi-level universe
145:Multi-level universe
280:From the talk page:
222:MEST (Scientology)
161:Deranged bulbasaur
149:Deranged bulbasaur
141:One-level universe
131:Deranged bulbasaur
347:
436:
423:
331:
239:
235:
229:
120:
102:
61:
46:speedily deleted
34:
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
426:deletion review
419:
404:Dante Alighieri
370:But not now. --
362:trialsanderrors
342:trialsanderrors
294:pasted here by
237:
233:
227:
93:
77:
74:
59:
50:Dante Alighieri
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
431:
430:
414:
413:
400:Speedy Deleted
397:
381:
380:
379:
348:
319:
318:
317:
316:
312:
292:
291:
290:
289:
277:
276:
260:
259:
245:
211:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
154:
127:
126:
73:
68:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
429:
427:
422:
416:
415:
412:
409:
405:
401:
398:
396:
393:
389:
385:
384:Speedy delete
382:
378:
375:
374:
368:
367:
366:
363:
359:
354:
353:
349:
346:
343:
339:
335:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:
313:
310:
309:
308:
307:
306:
305:
301:
300:
297:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
275:
272:
268:
265:
262:
261:
258:
255:
254:
249:
246:
244:
240:
231:
223:
219:
215:
212:
210:
207:
203:
200:
197:
196:
189:
188:
185:
180:
179:
178:
175:
171:
167:
166:
165:
162:
158:
155:
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
137:
136:
135:
132:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
62:
60:Daniel.Bryant
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
420:
417:
399:
383:
371:
350:
320:
303:
302:
296:Totnesmartin
293:
279:
278:
271:Totnesmartin
263:
251:
247:
213:
198:
181:
143:. It seems
128:
57:
54:deletion log
45:
43:
31:
28:
199:Delete all.
373:Abu badali
321:pasted by
267:Mark Hucko
253:Abu badali
214:Delete all
388:this page
334:test case
206:Sandstein
174:Sandstein
392:RHaworth
323:Mycroft7
184:Mycroft7
123:View log
172:below.
96:protect
91:history
358:basics
352:Delete
264:Delete
248:Delete
202:WP:NOR
139:Added
100:delete
52:; see
390:. --
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
408:Talk
340:. ~
230:acan
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
226:coe
121:– (
48:by
406:|
241:—
238:lk
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
236:a
234:t
228:l
125:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.