200:
i dont think it is polite for people of other faiths to come accross an article and recommend deletion instead of how to fix the article . This opens my concerns to hate crime or bigotry. some of the editors list their religion convictions and seem to be recommending harsh approach to deleting our
237:
This is a 1000 year old subject, this not an advertising or promotion ?. When we wrote the article your editors all wrote that we need to state references , hence the reference to the book. Like i said if constructive critism on how to fix the article and take away the notion of deletion. we have
293:
are clearly the same word in Arabic. Everything belongs in one article. If there are differences of belief, they get documented in the same article. You do not get to create a second article to differentiate your sect or school from another sect or school, and then
327:
It's an article, not a site. I cited a published book (not my own) and found links to pertinant websites, again, none of them my site. This is an encyclopedia, not a place to promote your book or teachings.
314:
i will delete the reference to our book 'healing power of sufi meditation' if that is what you mean by advertising our book. no thanks to wiki we are still not on the ny best sellers list :}
114:
185:
324:
is how to hinduism ? with promotion of a website by using the term
Outside links isnt that promotion of websites.--nur mir 07:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
17:
238:
every right to teach sufi meditation according to the NAQSHBANDI school of thought . i made reference to 100's article in the
87:
82:
91:
356:
282:
36:
262:. You are not supposed to be writing about yourself or your own work, it is not allowed by Knowledge (XXG) culture.
184:
I believe the original editor has added a comment, but in the wrong place. To be sure it is considered, please see
74:
201:
article . please reconsider and stop this process and help to construct and proper article if that is required.
355:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
251:
When we write about a subject we state who we are , where we got the info and what is our credibility.
205:
220:
is great. This is about the article. Knowledge (XXG) is not a place to promote your book or website.
337:
307:
271:
229:
208:
192:
176:
163:
137:
56:
285:. You are not allowed to fork an article simply because there is difference of belief or practice.
124:, Knowledge (XXG) is not an instruction manual. Also, I believe that there is a high probability
52:, wikipedia isn't an instruction manual, a better article on the same subject already exists. -
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
259:
189:
255:
121:
333:
303:
267:
225:
159:
133:
78:
128:
that the author does not understand the implications of releasing under the GFDL.
108:
202:
329:
321:
299:
263:
239:
221:
155:
129:
53:
70:
62:
173:
147:
49:
217:
317:
please help and not to delete--nur mir 07:32, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
349:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
146:- now I notice that there is a proper article on the topic at
242:
section which are literally all explaintions and how to's.
298:
so that they go to your article, which is what you did.
104:
100:
96:
278:
the other article is not according to our teachings.
186:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for deletion/Muraqabah
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
204:author of Sufi Healing and www.nurmuhammad.com --
359:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
320:regarding User:IPSOS comments , your site
296:change all the links in other articles
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
283:Knowledge (XXG):Content forking
1:
150:. So this article should be
376:
338:15:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
308:15:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
272:15:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
230:23:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
209:22:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
193:08:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
177:19:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
164:13:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
138:13:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
57:10:13, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
352:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
152:deleted and redirected
126:that this is a copyvio
170:Delete and redirect
367:
354:
112:
94:
34:
375:
374:
370:
369:
368:
366:
365:
364:
363:
357:deletion review
350:
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
373:
371:
362:
361:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
340:
318:
315:
312:
311:
310:
276:
275:
274:
246:
245:
244:
243:
232:
195:
179:
166:
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
372:
360:
358:
353:
347:
346:
339:
335:
331:
326:
325:
323:
319:
316:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
292:
288:
284:
280:
279:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
252:
250:
249:
248:
247:
241:
236:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
207:
203:
199:
196:
194:
191:
187:
183:
180:
178:
175:
171:
167:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
351:
348:
295:
290:
286:
234:
213:
197:
181:
169:
151:
143:
125:
120:
45:
43:
31:
28:
281:Please see
254:Please see
206:68.42.85.43
190:Notinasnaid
168:Agree with
322:Sri Chakra
240:meditation
216:- I think
291:muraqabah
71:Muraqabah
63:Muraqabah
287:Muraqaba
148:Muraqaba
115:View log
50:Muraqaba
46:redirect
260:WP:AUTO
235:Comment
214:Comment
198:Comment
182:Comment
144:Comment
88:protect
83:history
256:WP:COI
218:Sufism
122:WP:NOT
92:delete
330:IPSOS
300:IPSOS
264:IPSOS
222:IPSOS
156:IPSOS
130:IPSOS
109:views
101:watch
97:links
54:Bobet
16:<
334:talk
304:talk
289:and
268:talk
258:and
226:talk
160:talk
134:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
174:SLi
113:– (
48:to
336:)
306:)
270:)
228:)
188:.
172:--
162:)
154:.
136:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
332:(
302:(
266:(
224:(
158:(
132:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.