213:
uncommented on, since when that happens it gets relisted over and over. For these reasons, "per nom" is a perfectly valid reason to comment on this deletion, and does not represent me being lazy, nor does it represent a "vote" where "voting" is seen as an invalid reason for a closing admin to decide how he should handle this nomination. Rather, "per nom" is a good way to let the closing admin know that I have read the article; I have read the nominator's rationale, and I am adding myself to the people who want it deleted as a means of consensus-building which is outlined at
212:
policy reasons why this should be deleted, but would had they omitted one, I would have added it in my own rationale behind my bolded delete. However since they have not, I endorse the deletion for the exact same reasons the nominator did, and I did not want to leave the nomination entirely
149:
143:
243:
110:
180:
Non-notable book published through a pay-to-publish company. No RS coverage; the CNN source is a poorly written "student log" by one of the students mentioned in
83:
78:
87:
208:
and by "per nom" I believe that, in my opinion, the nominator has given a complete enough account of why this should be deleted that I cannot add any
70:
164:
131:
193:
17:
125:
258:
234:
197:
52:
121:
74:
272:
36:
271:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
171:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
66:
58:
181:
137:
214:
189:
157:
227:
254:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
49:
185:
220:
250:
104:
265:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
100:
96:
92:
156:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:). No further edits should be made to this page.
244:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
170:
8:
242:Note: This debate has been included in the
241:
7:
24:
184:story, not an actual CNN piece.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
292:
268:Please do not modify it.
259:14:43, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
235:02:18, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
198:02:00, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
53:05:38, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
67:Murder on a Horse Trail
59:Murder on a Horse Trail
44:The result was
261:
247:
218:
283:
270:
248:
230:
223:
207:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
291:
290:
286:
285:
284:
282:
281:
280:
279:
273:deletion review
266:
228:
221:
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
289:
287:
278:
277:
262:
238:
237:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
288:
276:
274:
269:
263:
260:
256:
252:
245:
240:
239:
236:
233:
232:
231:
224:
216:
211:
205:
202:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
267:
264:
226:
225:
215:WP:CONSENSUS
209:
203:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
144:free images
210:additional
50:Courcelles
251:• Gene93k
206:per nom.
186:Roscelese
194:contribs
111:View log
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
222:Jayron
204:Delete
122:Google
88:delete
46:delete
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
255:talk
190:talk
182:this
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
217:.
172:TWL
109:– (
257:)
249:—
246:.
229:32
219:--
196:)
192:⋅
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
253:(
188:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.