Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Musicianforums - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

123:
A website's impact can be demonstrated by meeting one or more of the following criteria: (...) Having a forum with 5,000 or more apparently unique members
94:
Although it boasts 73,000 members, it doesn't make sense as a stand-alone page. The others don't make any valid claims to notability. -
17: 125:. Now, this article claims 85,000 members for this forum. This would clearly meet the criteria and pass the notability bar. 167: 36: 82:: This forum claims 73,000 members. When nominating, please provide reasons why you think something is non-notable. 166:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
108:
Non-notable messageboard, nowhere on the level of say... the GameFAQs board. Reads like an advertisement. --
149: 133: 112: 98: 89: 73: 57: 53: 146: 130: 63: 49: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
86: 118: 109: 95: 70: 83: 129:
Anyway, however, the article does at least make a strong claim to notability.
69:
Non-notable forums. Part of a group of four non-notable webpages. -
160:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
127:
The catch is that I can't open the site to check for myself.
141:. I have now been able to open the site, and it says 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 170:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 143:Members: 85,258, Active Members: 10,393 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 117:Your first argument is not valid. 24: 1: 44:The result of the debate was 150:16:34, 25 October 2005 (UTC) 134:21:01, 24 October 2005 (UTC) 113:06:41, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 99:06:00, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 90:05:38, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 74:05:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC) 58:22:36, 1 November 2005 (UTC) 187: 163:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 121:says the following: 178: 165: 34: 186: 185: 181: 180: 179: 177: 176: 175: 174: 168:deletion review 161: 67: 48:(thus keep). – 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 184: 182: 173: 172: 155: 153: 152: 136: 115: 103: 102: 101: 66: 64:Musicianforums 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 183: 171: 169: 164: 158: 157: 156: 151: 148: 144: 140: 137: 135: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 114: 111: 107: 104: 100: 97: 93: 92: 91: 88: 85: 81: 78: 77: 76: 75: 72: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 162: 159: 154: 142: 138: 126: 122: 105: 79: 68: 50:Jitse Niesen 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 145:. Notable. 147:Punkmorten 131:Punkmorten 110:Madchester 96:Nameneko 71:Nameneko 106:Delete. 80:Comment 119:WP:WEB 87:(talk) 84:Meelar 16:< 139:Keep 54:talk 56:) 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Jitse Niesen
talk
22:36, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
Musicianforums
Nameneko
05:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Meelar
(talk)
05:38, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Nameneko
06:00, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Madchester
06:41, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
WP:WEB
Punkmorten
21:01, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
Punkmorten
16:34, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.