735:- at least two of the citations provide an actual game review, providing commentry beyond the event itself. I understand the nominator's application of NOT#NEWS, and indeed all the references in the article are from September (it's not a subject that has "received significant coverage over a period of time".) But aren't most games reviewed in the month that they are released anyway?
460:
Define "subject". There are two elements to the content, the game and the controversy. A claim of notability made under WP:TOY for this sort of amateur unlicensed release is clearly riding on the back of NEWS coverage of the controversy. One review source was quite explicit about this - he was not
812:
While I agree with your analysis of the debate as a snowball keep, I suppose it could be argued that the nominator was still commenting heavily in an attempt to make their case, which is one of the suggested criteria for not snowball closing. However, that could have been brought up in a deletion
838:
as offensive as the game is, it's pretty much a textbook definition of a notable game. There are a lot of reliable third-party sources that have covered this game because of its controversy. Sure, the controversy was braindead shock value that generated a flash of cheap publicity rather than any
764:, so I can't see a valid reason for deletion. Whether the article was notable at the exact time of its creation is not relevant now, as long as it has become notable at some point since then, which this has. Also, it is not necessary to show ongoing media coverage and interest in order to pass
162:
is worthy of an article. The controversy has generated no further debate beyond the initial news sources. The controversy has generated no lasting cultural, social or intellectual changes in video gaming or the wider world. The controversy has not been the subject of any third party comment or
73:
522:
about an event, the controversial release of a video game. It is simply gaming the Afd process to say that the presence of news sources that only exist because of the temporarily controversial event can then be transplanted to establish notability for the game that, had it not been for the
793:
closure, SNOW is based on a demonstration that a discussion will blatantly close in a particular way, it does not require any specific criteria. My close was based on the fact that the keep votes are supported by policy, making the nominator's argument null.
339:
68:
752:- subject has received significant coverage in a wide range of multiple reliable sources, most of which specifically discuss this game and the controversy in detail, rather than just making passing mentions. This article therefore satisfies
100:
95:
104:
87:
461:
initially going to review the game until he saw the controversy, he stated he regretted having been conned into doing so because the game in his opinion clearly would not have warranted any notability
91:
910:
893:
875:
852:
826:
803:
781:
744:
726:
694:
672:
642:
612:
580:
550:
532:
509:
474:
453:
424:
409:
391:
369:
351:
321:
304:
288:
260:
241:
210:
194:
172:
52:
147:
Following the usual arguments to keep at the original Afd that "Google says yes", the article, as both a game article or a controversy article, still stands as a clear violation of
83:
58:
465:. The controversy is what needs to have demonstrated lasting third party comment beyond initial news sources, in order to not violate NOT#NEWS and justify the content - it hasn't.
537:
It looks to me like the article is not about the "event" of the controversial release of a video game, but is about the game itself and the controversy it caused. I don't think
133:
623:
883:
Well, it's about 9 to 1, which indicates a 90% consensus to keep, which is more than enough that there's no way that it would ever result in delete. Snowball keep yet? -
541:
applies here for this reason. A game that caused controversy covered in multiple reliable sources isn't akin to an event that happened to be announced in a newspaper.
267:
NOTE: I saw this on my watchlist and then saw the page. There was no warning from the creator of this AfD that this was still in construction. No need to scorn me.
163:
analysis beyond the initial news sources. At best, as the passage of time has shown, this content is, and always was, something for
Wikinews rather than Knowledge.
140:
This game was not notable at the time of the article's creation (i.e. the game itself). The original sources only asserted notability for a proposed article titled
813:
review if really felt necessary. While administrators can revert non-admin closures they believe were premature, I don't think non-admins are supposed to simply
220:- I feel it's notable. It has appeared in more than several media outlets (as per first AfD). There has been considrable controversy around the game's creation.
682:
653:
442:
do not discuss anything about lasting impact or media coverage after the initial release. The subject is covered by multiple reliable sources, thus meeting
890:
596:
421:
388:
318:
207:
414:
Not sufficiently so. You disputed the notability and how well-sourced it was at all points, and it was determined back in the day that it is notable. -
496:
pertains primarily to articles about events and not necessarily concrete objects like video games that are backed by print and/or online sources.
181:
Per the Afd guidelines, please actually read the nomination before you register an opinion in this debate, "speedy" or otherwise. I
278:
231:
17:
284:
237:
200:
That the first three contributors didn't agree with your argument is far from "people not reading your nomination". -
159:
141:
862:- Can't see why it shouldn't be notable. Article is factual and neutral. Game is no more or no less sick than e.g.
887:
418:
385:
315:
204:
925:
36:
924:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
884:
871:
415:
382:
312:
201:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
451:
740:
906:
901:, as the article has met all notability guidelines and consensus for Keep is clear at this point. --
863:
528:
470:
405:
365:
347:
300:
295:
I would have thought the page being a redlink would have shown the Afd was still under-construction.
256:
190:
168:
251:
note: So eager to keep was the above voter, that they voted before I had even created the Afd page.
867:
848:
272:
225:
666:
636:
606:
574:
503:
447:
567:
and being "ass about face." In other words. It's not like anyone is out to get you or anything.
690:
155:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
74:
Articles for deletion/Muslim
Massacre: The Game of Modern Religious Genocide (2nd nomination)
736:
523:
controversial event, would never have been notable as a game. It's totally ass about face.
902:
840:
798:
769:
711:
704:
560:
524:
466:
401:
361:
343:
296:
252:
186:
164:
681:, you require "third party comment or analysis beyond the initial news sources", right?
844:
822:
790:
777:
722:
564:
546:
268:
221:
185:, but based on the first three contributors, I have doubts this is actually happening.
340:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Muslim_Massacre:_The_Game_of_Modern_Religious_Genocide
660:
630:
600:
568:
556:
538:
497:
493:
443:
439:
182:
148:
866:. There would appear to be precedent for having articles on this type of subject.
761:
686:
485:
49:
121:
843:. An entirely notable game that can be written about in an encyclopedic manner.
765:
757:
753:
489:
818:
773:
718:
542:
69:
Articles for deletion/Muslim
Massacre: The Game of Modern Religious Genocide
484:— I may be missing something, but it looks like there are plenty of
918:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
360:"Per previous Afd" does not address the reasons for nomination.
381:. Well-sourced, and covered in multiple reliable sources. -
311:
These comments, MickMacNee, are really inappropriate. -
714:
707:
158:, this article has not demonstrated any reason why the
128:
117:
113:
109:
84:
Muslim
Massacre: The Game of Modern Religious Genocide
59:
Muslim
Massacre: The Game of Modern Religious Genocide
703:: Non admin AFD closure as keep at 11am, 21st Dec by
400:
Facts which aren't disputed by me in the nomination.
891:
Now, he can figure out the length of things easily.
817:a closure, regardless of whether it was non-admin.
422:
Now, he can figure out the length of things easily.
389:
Now, he can figure out the length of things easily.
319:
Now, he can figure out the length of things easily.
208:
Now, he can figure out the length of things easily.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
928:). No further edits should be made to this page.
624:list of Middle East-related deletion discussions
597:list of video game related deletion discussions
710:. Closure reverted at 11:40am as premature by
8:
438:. The notability guidelines for video game
654:list of Islam-related deletion discussions
652:: This debate has been included in the
622:: This debate has been included in the
595:: This debate has been included in the
183:want to assume this is done by everybody
66:
7:
65:
24:
444:the general notability guideline
160:Muslim Massacre game controversy
142:Muslim Massacre game controversy
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
911:23:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
894:20:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
876:17:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
853:08:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
827:09:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
804:19:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
782:15:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
745:13:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
727:17:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
695:02:34, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
673:00:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
643:00:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
613:00:52, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
581:16:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
555:I would appreciate it if you
551:16:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
533:04:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
510:00:52, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
475:20:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
454:20:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
425:19:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
410:19:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
392:18:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
370:19:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
352:17:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
322:20:39, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
305:19:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
289:17:51, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
261:16:49, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
242:16:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
211:20:35, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
195:19:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
173:16:49, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
53:01:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
841:notability is not temporary
770:notability is not temporary
563:rather than accusing me of
945:
440:Knowledge:TOY#Video_games
921:Please do not modify it.
885:The New Age Retro Hippie
416:The New Age Retro Hippie
383:The New Age Retro Hippie
313:The New Age Retro Hippie
202:The New Age Retro Hippie
32:Please do not modify it.
760:, the sources satisfy
492:. I also thought that
64:AfDs for this article:
839:enduring impact. But
864:Wolfenstein (series)
338:: See previous Afd.
789:- A note about my
729:
675:
657:
645:
627:
615:
557:assume good faith
324:
307:
291:
263:
936:
923:
802:
699:
669:
663:
658:
648:
639:
633:
628:
618:
609:
603:
591:
577:
571:
506:
500:
486:reliable sources
310:
294:
266:
250:
131:
125:
107:
44:The result was
34:
944:
943:
939:
938:
937:
935:
934:
933:
932:
926:deletion review
919:
795:
712:User:MickMacNee
705:User:Neurolysis
667:
661:
637:
631:
607:
601:
575:
569:
504:
498:
488:that establish
127:
98:
82:
79:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
942:
940:
931:
930:
914:
913:
896:
878:
868:Power.corrupts
856:
855:
832:
831:
830:
829:
807:
806:
784:
747:
730:
697:
676:
646:
616:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
553:
513:
512:
478:
477:
457:
456:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
395:
394:
375:
374:
373:
372:
355:
354:
332:
331:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
264:
245:
244:
214:
213:
177:
154:Per the essay
138:
137:
78:
77:
76:
71:
63:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
941:
929:
927:
922:
916:
915:
912:
908:
904:
900:
899:Snowball Keep
897:
895:
892:
889:
886:
882:
879:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
858:
857:
854:
850:
846:
842:
837:
836:Snowball Keep
834:
833:
828:
824:
820:
816:
811:
810:
809:
808:
805:
801:
800:
792:
788:
785:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
748:
746:
742:
738:
734:
731:
728:
724:
720:
716:
713:
709:
706:
702:
698:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
677:
674:
670:
664:
655:
651:
647:
644:
640:
634:
625:
621:
617:
614:
610:
604:
598:
594:
590:
589:
582:
578:
572:
566:
562:
558:
554:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
535:
534:
530:
526:
521:
517:
516:
515:
514:
511:
507:
501:
495:
491:
487:
483:
480:
479:
476:
472:
468:
464:
459:
458:
455:
452:
449:
445:
441:
437:
434:
433:
426:
423:
420:
417:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
396:
393:
390:
387:
384:
380:
377:
376:
371:
367:
363:
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
333:
323:
320:
317:
314:
309:
308:
306:
302:
298:
293:
292:
290:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
270:
265:
262:
258:
254:
249:
248:
247:
246:
243:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
216:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
175:
174:
170:
166:
161:
157:
152:
150:
145:
143:
135:
130:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
70:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
920:
917:
898:
880:
859:
835:
814:
796:
786:
749:
732:
700:
678:
649:
619:
592:
519:
518:The article
481:
462:
435:
378:
335:
281:
275:
234:
228:
217:
178:
176:
153:
146:
139:
45:
43:
31:
28:
888:used Ruler!
737:Marasmusine
683:here you go
539:WP:NOT#NEWS
494:WP:NOT#NEWS
419:used Ruler!
386:used Ruler!
379:Strong keep
336:Strong Keep
316:used Ruler!
218:Strong Keep
205:used Ruler!
149:WP:NOT#NEWS
903:Jelly Soup
561:more civil
525:MickMacNee
490:notability
467:MickMacNee
402:MickMacNee
362:MickMacNee
344:Chasingsol
297:MickMacNee
253:MickMacNee
187:MickMacNee
165:MickMacNee
156:WP:NOTNEWS
845:Randomran
463:as a game
269:LOTRrules
222:LOTRrules
768:because
662:MuZemike
632:MuZemike
602:MuZemike
570:MuZemike
499:MuZemike
279:contribs
232:contribs
134:View log
881:Comment
791:WP:SNOW
787:Comment
733:Comment
687:Juzhong
559:and be
101:protect
96:history
50:John254
815:revert
565:gaming
179:NOTICE
129:delete
105:delete
799:neuro
762:WP:RS
285:email
238:email
132:) – (
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
907:talk
872:talk
860:Keep
849:talk
823:talk
819:Wiw8
778:talk
774:Wiw8
766:WP:N
758:WP:V
756:and
754:WP:N
750:Keep
741:talk
723:talk
719:Wiw8
715:here
708:here
701:Note
691:talk
679:Keep
668:talk
650:Note
638:talk
620:Note
608:talk
593:Note
576:talk
547:talk
543:Wiw8
529:talk
505:talk
482:Keep
471:talk
446:. -
436:Keep
406:talk
366:talk
348:talk
301:talk
273:talk
257:talk
226:talk
191:talk
169:talk
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
46:keep
656:.
626:.
448:Mgm
151:.
144:.
909:)
874:)
851:)
825:)
797:—
780:)
772:.
743:)
725:)
717:.
693:)
685:.
671:)
641:)
611:)
599:.
579:)
549:)
531:)
520:is
508:)
473:)
408:)
368:)
350:)
342:.
303:)
287:)
259:)
240:)
193:)
171:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
48:.
905:(
870:(
847:(
821:(
776:(
739:(
721:(
689:(
665:(
659:—
635:(
629:—
605:(
573:(
545:(
527:(
502:(
469:(
450:|
404:(
364:(
346:(
299:(
282:·
276:·
271:(
255:(
235:·
229:·
224:(
189:(
167:(
136:)
126:(
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.