Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/My Opera Community (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

199:
states, "Communities, message boards and blogs are generally not notable". The My Opera Community therefore requires a greater than usual burden of proof to establish notability, and this burden is obviously not
79: 139: 304: 147: 74: 275: 365:
I have added a few sources and the website is used as a socialnetworking site for a heap of people The article does need a clean up though, but not a deletion.
346:
Finding these articles only took a few minutes. I am sure that plenty of sources can be found with more looking. Cleanup is not a reason to delete.
332: 106: 101: 110: 93: 405: 374: 357: 322: 293: 265: 230: 58: 259: 17: 421: 36: 420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
227: 352: 97: 223:: They are reliable enough in this context, but not 3rd party. There's a difference between these notions. 190: 224: 317: 288: 244: 178: 53: 385: 347: 240: 196: 89: 64: 340: 174: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
370: 344: 311: 282: 158:
except for one eWeek article, the subject of the article fails the notability guidelines of
186: 248: 159: 210: 155: 127: 342: 366: 182: 170: 146:
Second nomination. I believe that the issues were inadequately discussed in the
166:
non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself".
209:, are from the official Opera and My Opera websites, which are not 414:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
80:
Articles for deletion/My Opera Community (2nd nomination)
205:
All of the sources cited, except for the aforementioned
134: 123: 119: 115: 185:
arguments. The "endorsement" of My Opera Community by
305:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 424:). No further edits should be made to this page. 243:. The subject maybe deserves brief treatment in 339:results. There also seem to be articles on it. 173:in the previous discussion is little more than 276:list of Software-related deletion discussions 239:In light of the above, the article is mostly 8: 303:: This debate has been included in the 274:: This debate has been included in the 75:Articles for deletion/My Opera Community 72: 7: 71: 154:Having no significant coverage in 24: 384:. Per Captain panda and Fosnez. 162:, particularly the mandate for " 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 406:22:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 375:02:03, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 358:22:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 323:18:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 294:18:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 266:20:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 231:19:11, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 59:06:14, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 247:, but not its own article. — 441: 417:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 193:is likewise irrelevant. 70:AfDs for this article: 197:WP:OUTCOMES#Internet 245:Opera (web browser) 148:previous discussion 189:as pointed out by 90:My Opera Community 65:My Opera Community 44:The result was 401: 325: 308: 296: 279: 263: 253: 432: 419: 399: 393: 388: 355: 350: 320: 314: 309: 299: 291: 285: 280: 270: 257: 252: 211:reliable sources 181:, which are not 156:reliable sources 137: 131: 113: 56: 49: 34: 440: 439: 435: 434: 433: 431: 430: 429: 428: 422:deletion review 415: 397: 391: 353: 348: 318: 312: 289: 283: 262: 256: 191:Kjetil Kjernsmo 187:Tim Berners-Lee 133: 104: 88: 85: 68: 54: 47: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 438: 436: 427: 426: 410: 409: 378: 377: 360: 335:brings up 6.3 326: 297: 268: 258: 254: 236: 235: 234: 233: 215: 214: 203: 202: 201: 194: 169:A response by 144: 143: 84: 83: 82: 77: 69: 67: 62: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 437: 425: 423: 418: 412: 411: 408: 407: 403: 402: 400: 394: 383: 380: 379: 376: 372: 368: 364: 361: 359: 356: 351: 345: 343: 341: 338: 334: 333:google search 330: 327: 324: 321: 315: 306: 302: 298: 295: 292: 286: 277: 273: 269: 267: 261: 260:CONTRIBUTIONS 250: 246: 242: 238: 237: 232: 229: 226: 222: 219: 218: 217: 216: 212: 208: 204: 198: 195: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 167: 165: 161: 157: 153: 152: 151: 149: 141: 136: 129: 125: 121: 117: 112: 108: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 86: 81: 78: 76: 73: 66: 63: 61: 60: 57: 51: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 416: 413: 404: 395: 389: 387: 381: 362: 336: 328: 300: 271: 220: 206: 179:WP:BIGNUMBER 163: 145: 45: 43: 31: 28: 313:Fabrictramp 284:Fabrictramp 319:talk to me 290:talk to me 183:notability 175:WP:ILIKEIT 249:J.P. Doul 241:fancruft 164:multiple 140:View log 55:Tiptoety 349:Captain 337:million 221:Comment 107:protect 102:history 367:Fosnez 171:Vetler 160:WP:WEB 135:delete 111:delete 354:panda 138:) – ( 128:views 120:watch 116:links 16:< 390:Banj 382:Keep 371:talk 363:Keep 329:Keep 301:Note 272:Note 200:met. 177:and 124:logs 98:talk 94:edit 386:-- 310:-- 307:. 281:-- 278:. 207:one 398:oi 373:) 331:A 316:| 287:| 264:) 225:VG 150:: 126:| 122:| 118:| 114:| 109:| 105:| 100:| 96:| 52:. 50:ep 396:b 392:e 369:( 255:/ 251:( 228:☎ 213:. 142:) 132:( 130:) 92:( 48:e 46:K

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Tiptoety
06:14, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
My Opera Community
Articles for deletion/My Opera Community
Articles for deletion/My Opera Community (2nd nomination)
My Opera Community
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
previous discussion
reliable sources
WP:WEB
Vetler
WP:ILIKEIT
WP:BIGNUMBER
notability
Tim Berners-Lee
Kjetil Kjernsmo
WP:OUTCOMES#Internet
reliable sources

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.