240:
each time was as equally blatant as the other, and also equally blatant as this currently existing article, especially since literally all of the listed sources here are advertising or clear paid republishing of it; as it is, we've known we cannot take these publications seriously because of the
248:
in 2014, there has still been no improvements and that's in fact because there are none, especially since I myself saw unsurprising mountains of clear PR and republications of it. As if it wasn't enough, no one ever actually acknowledged the blatancy of paid advertising at the 1st AfD, and the
273:
Yes, that is more often the case. People claim that the article should be improved by normal editing but nobody, especially the ones saying that it should be cleaned up, does anything. Effectively undermining the stance that
Knowledge (XXG) is not for advertising.
202:
301:, considering most of the coverage is about the founder (who clearly has some recognition) rather than the company. To be honest, I hold my hands up and admit I don't know why I accepted this article at
100:
95:
244:
Therefore, considering WP:SPAM and WP:NOT, we are able to delete such blatant advertising especially when it's clearly been started and existing for exactly. Since it was nominated by
155:
196:
309:
coverage appears to consist of barely concealed press releases). Therefore with only passing mentions and specialist e-commerce/tech website coverage it fails
162:
313:. I'm quite shocked that no-one (other than the nominator) challenged the article at the original AfD. Simple saying it has hits on Google isn't enough.
90:
305:
back in 2014, I think I was fairly new to the process. There really is no general news coverage, of any substance, about the company (the
302:
17:
69:
331:
241:
sheer blatancy of republishing company advertising, not what a genuine news agency publishes about genuine information.
408:
389:
372:
346:
322:
287:
267:
73:
40:
217:
184:
128:
123:
132:
262:
115:
65:
404:
385:
342:
178:
36:
357:
281:
250:
210:
174:
298:
53:
119:
61:
310:
366:
224:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
403:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
381:
111:
79:
318:
276:
245:
57:
190:
362:
149:
314:
397:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
334:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
237:
145:
141:
137:
356:. Business-as-usual coverage in minor spammy sources.
277:
209:
56:- which is also up for deletion - can be requested at
340:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
223:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
411:). No further edits should be made to this page.
101:Articles for deletion/Mydala (3rd nomination)
96:Articles for deletion/Mydala (2nd nomination)
8:
52:. And salt. A fully protected redirect to
88:
363:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
249:history now has only emphasized it.
86:
24:
1:
323:18:41, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
288:01:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
268:00:35, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
74:09:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
390:06:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
373:09:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
347:08:57, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
91:Articles for deletion/Mydala
428:
60:at editorial discretion.
400:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
238:deleted 3 times in 2010
85:AfDs for this article:
380:as persistent spam.
349:
307:Business Standard
419:
402:
369:
345:
339:
337:
335:
286:
279:
265:
260:
228:
227:
213:
165:
153:
135:
34:
427:
426:
422:
421:
420:
418:
417:
416:
415:
409:deletion review
398:
378:Delete and salt
371:
367:
350:
341:
330:
328:
275:
263:
251:
234:Delete and Salt
170:
161:
126:
110:
107:
105:
83:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
425:
423:
414:
413:
393:
392:
375:
361:
338:
327:
326:
325:
291:
290:
231:
230:
167:
106:
104:
103:
98:
93:
87:
84:
82:
77:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
424:
412:
410:
406:
401:
395:
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
376:
374:
370:
364:
359:
355:
352:
351:
348:
344:
343:North America
336:
333:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
292:
289:
285:
284:
280:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
261:
258:
254:
247:
242:
239:
236:as literally
235:
226:
222:
219:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
176:
173:
172:Find sources:
168:
164:
160:
157:
151:
147:
143:
139:
134:
130:
125:
121:
117:
113:
109:
108:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
81:
78:
76:
75:
71:
70:contributions
67:
63:
62:Jo-Jo Eumerus
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
399:
396:
377:
353:
329:
306:
299:Anisha Singh
294:
282:
256:
252:
243:
233:
232:
220:
214:
206:
199:
193:
187:
181:
171:
158:
54:Anisha Singh
49:
47:
31:
28:
382:K.e.coffman
358:WP:CORPSPAM
197:free images
368:reply here
278:The Banner
246:The Banner
405:talk page
37:talk page
407:or in a
332:Relisted
311:WP:NCORP
295:Redirect
156:View log
39:or in a
203:WP refs
191:scholar
129:protect
124:history
354:Delete
259:wister
255:wister
175:Google
133:delete
112:Mydala
80:Mydala
50:delete
315:Sionk
218:JSTOR
179:books
163:Stats
150:views
142:watch
138:links
58:WP:AN
16:<
386:talk
360:. --
319:talk
283:talk
264:talk
211:FENS
185:news
146:logs
120:talk
116:edit
66:talk
303:AfC
297:to
225:TWL
154:– (
388:)
321:)
205:)
148:|
144:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
122:|
118:|
72:)
68:,
384:(
365:|
317:(
257:T
253:S
229:)
221:·
215:·
207:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
182:·
177:(
169:(
166:)
159:·
152:)
114:(
64:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.