278:), but I certainly haven't seen anything to suggest that it's a part of "most" fractal art software, as the article currently claims. There are other mentions, but no definitive, specific coverage from a major, credible source that I could spot. I'd feel comfortable keeping it if we could find even just one clear definition of the term in a reliable source, but without that I'm leaning toward redirecting it until something more solid emerges. And, given the current state of the article, it's not as though the encyclopedia would be losing much. -
220:
Non-notable fractal. There are a couple dozen sources on this in Google scholar and Google books, but as far as I can tell all of these sources were published subsequently to the 2008 addition of this material to
Knowledge, all give little or no detail (maybe a figure but not even the formula), and
301:. Not independently notable, not enough content for a standalone article. The previous AfD does seem to be more of a merge/delete than a keep, and probably should have been closed no consensus, but even if it were a solid keep seven years is more than enough time for consensus to change.--
229:, in particular copying the sentence "Examples of this type are the Mandelbrot set, Julia set, the Burning Ship fractal, the Nova fractal and the Lyapunov fractal." from that version. I can find no reliable in-depth sources that are independent of Knowledge, so I believe the topic fails
233:. The previous AfD, in 2008, did not seriously address the lack of sources, instead defaulting to a keep based on weak arguments such as claims that all mathematical formulae are inherently notable (which I don't believe). —
189:
88:
183:
250:
142:
83:
149:
308:
115:
110:
355:
336:
312:
287:
259:
242:
119:
67:
17:
204:
102:
171:
321:
283:
374:
40:
275:
238:
165:
161:
370:
332:
279:
255:
36:
211:
351:
303:
234:
197:
106:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
369:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
177:
274:: I think I've found one example of its being implemented in a fractal software package (
347:
298:
58:
51:
230:
98:
73:
136:
324:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
346:- no sources, not enough evidence of notability to justify its own article.
226:
363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
55:. Can be merged from the history as may be appropriate.
222:
132:
128:
124:
196:
330:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
89:
Articles for deletion/Nova fractal (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
377:). No further edits should be made to this page.
210:
8:
251:list of Science-related deletion discussions
249:Note: This debate has been included in the
248:
81:
7:
80:
84:Articles for deletion/Nova fractal
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
394:
288:13:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
260:00:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
243:20:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
225:of the Knowledge article
221:all are plagiarized from
366:Please do not modify it.
68:08:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
356:15:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
337:02:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
313:02:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
79:AfDs for this article:
339:
306:
262:
66:
385:
368:
335:
329:
327:
325:
302:
280:Bryanrutherford0
258:
223:the 2008 version
215:
214:
200:
152:
140:
122:
65:
63:
56:
34:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
381:
375:deletion review
364:
344:Delete or merge
340:
331:
320:
318:
311:
254:
157:
148:
113:
97:
94:
77:
59:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
391:
389:
380:
379:
359:
358:
328:
317:
316:
315:
307:
304:JohnBlackburne
299:Newton fractal
291:
290:
264:
263:
235:David Eppstein
218:
217:
154:
93:
92:
91:
86:
78:
76:
71:
52:Newton fractal
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
390:
378:
376:
372:
367:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
341:
338:
334:
333:North America
326:
323:
314:
310:
305:
300:
296:
293:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
265:
261:
257:
256:North America
252:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
213:
209:
206:
203:
199:
195:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:Find sources:
155:
151:
147:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
90:
87:
85:
82:
75:
72:
70:
69:
64:
62:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
365:
362:
343:
319:
294:
271:
267:
219:
207:
201:
193:
186:
180:
174:
168:
158:
145:
99:Nova fractal
74:Nova fractal
60:
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
268:Weak delete
184:free images
61:Sandstein
371:talk page
348:Gandalf61
37:talk page
373:or in a
322:Relisted
272:Redirect
143:View log
39:or in a
227:Fractal
190:WP refs
178:scholar
116:protect
111:history
231:WP:GNG
162:Google
120:delete
309:deeds
295:merge
205:JSTOR
166:books
150:Stats
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
352:talk
284:talk
276:here
239:talk
198:FENS
172:news
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
297:to
212:TWL
141:– (
354:)
286:)
253:.
241:)
192:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
350:(
282:(
270:/
237:(
216:)
208:·
202:·
194:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
164:(
156:(
153:)
146:·
139:)
101:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.