347:-- No. As they're being added, resources are being misquoted or just simply invented and that is simply not acceptable. Credit is due to the person trying to update the article as they seem to have the skills of an expert PR agent to spin around so many words, but we can't have it on Knowledge (XXG). The soundtrack? A movie barely worth mention in a pop culture sense and has 53 other songs on it. Ballet? The performance featured the music, but saying they "based a ballet performance" is false, and according to the source it was a 2-month stint somewhere and not "toured around Europe". The art? Yes, it's of the musician, but in the article one piece of art is related. Not multiple things, not things from more than one person. Saying "has inspired several visual artists such as..." is 100% false unless a different source is given. I know it can be common for band articles to not sound entirely neutral, but even then you can't lie or change what was published. Change that all and make up the source list from scratch so that at least one part of
306:
As I said on the talk page: Refs 1-3, 6 are trivial mentions and refs 4 and 5 don't discuss the band at all, only a single song by them that is barely famous let alone notable. I didn't try a google search because I was in a public place and I feared what "No bra" would bring
160:
254:
121:
154:
428:
It looks more like evidence of the band being notable as attention-seekers than anything else, but it's an improvement on the original list of references. Change to
328:
as it stands. A couple of endorsements by DJs is a start, but we need more than that. Will reconsider if substantial coverage from reliable sources are pointed out.
235:
224:
17:
94:
89:
210:
98:
175:
142:
81:
437:
333:
491:
on Google, including quite a few profiles. She has toured internationally, gaining press in the process, which satisfies
583:
36:
547:
495:. The article does need more work. It could possibly be redirected/merged into an as yet uncreated article about her.
136:
193:"No indication of notability unreferenced, only relevant google hit is the artist's MySpace page. In short, fails
582:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
469:
433:
329:
56:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
132:
432:, on the proviso that if the article stays, some of the more extravagant claims need to be put into context.
568:
551:
543:
524:
504:
476:
441:
423:
363:
337:
316:
296:
294:
271:
269:
243:
218:
63:
182:
487:
No Bra is the primary expression of
Susanne Oberbeck, a significant contemporary multimedia artist -
312:
238:
228:
204:
200:
564:
520:
500:
462:
359:
168:
49:
539:
453:
406:
85:
283:
488:
148:
396:
287:
262:
214:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
492:
374:
348:
194:
512:
388:
392:
383:
308:
535:
286:, unless being featured in many unremarkable compilations is an assertion of notability.
560:
516:
496:
416:
356:
401:
378:
77:
69:
411:
115:
373:– the subject seems to have some coverage in reliable sources, enough to meet
559:. sourced provided by editors above indicate that the band is notable. --
456:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
576:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
255:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
534:
Easily satisfies notability requirements with multiple
111:
107:
103:
167:
415:. And that was just with a few minutes of searching.
461:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
351:guidelines are met, and I'll gladly think it over.
181:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
586:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
249:
542:work should have been done by nominator.
253:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
538:coverage. It does seem like some
240:(I am the Czar of all Russias!)
1:
569:22:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
64:22:57, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
552:01:18, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
525:21:12, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
505:21:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
477:15:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
442:18:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
424:01:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
364:19:07, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
338:07:58, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
317:21:35, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
297:17:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
272:15:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
244:15:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
282:per nom. No sources, fails
603:
191:Removed PROD. Reason was
579:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
511:I've put a redirect on
434:Chris Neville-Smith
407:non-trivial mention
397:non-trivial mention
330:Chris Neville-Smith
213:) and seconded by
199:PROD was added by
44:The result was
544:Shawn in Montreal
479:
422:
274:
258:
594:
581:
513:Susanne Oberbeck
472:
460:
458:
421:
419:
362:
292:
265:
259:
241:
233:
186:
185:
171:
119:
101:
59:
34:
602:
601:
597:
596:
595:
593:
592:
591:
590:
584:deletion review
577:
470:
451:
417:
355:
288:
263:
239:
231:Lord Spongefrog
229:
128:
92:
76:
73:
57:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
600:
598:
589:
588:
572:
571:
554:
528:
527:
508:
507:
481:
480:
459:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
377:criterion #1.
367:
366:
341:
340:
320:
319:
300:
299:
276:
275:
189:
188:
125:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
599:
587:
585:
580:
574:
573:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
530:
529:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
509:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
483:
482:
478:
475:
473:
466:
465:
457:
455:
450:
449:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
420:
414:
413:
408:
405:, and even a
404:
403:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
380:
376:
372:
369:
368:
365:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
343:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
322:
321:
318:
314:
310:
305:
302:
301:
298:
295:
293:
291:
285:
281:
278:
277:
273:
270:
267:
266:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
237:
234:
232:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
209:
206:
202:
198:
196:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:No Bra (band)
75:
74:
71:
70:No Bra (band)
68:
66:
65:
62:
60:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
578:
575:
556:
531:
484:
467:
463:
452:
429:
412:The Guardian
410:
400:
382:
370:
352:
344:
324:
323:
303:
290:Victão Lopes
289:
279:
264:Juliancolton
261:
250:
230:
221:
215:Victor Lopes
207:
192:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
54:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
485:Strong Keep
155:free images
489:3,850 hits
402:Libération
309:TParis00ap
201:Spongefrog
561:Pink Bull
540:WP:BEFORE
517:Wwwhatsup
497:Wwwhatsup
418:Paul Erik
393:Pitchfork
357:daTheisen
454:Relisted
284:WP:MUSIC
225:contribs
211:contribs
122:View log
493:WP:BAND
430:neutral
379:Article
375:WP:BAND
349:WP:BAND
195:WP:BAND
161:WP refs
149:scholar
95:protect
90:history
389:review
360:(talk)
345:Delete
325:Delete
304:Delete
280:Delete
133:Google
99:delete
536:WP:RS
307:up.--
176:JSTOR
137:books
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
565:talk
557:Keep
548:talk
532:Keep
521:talk
501:talk
471:Talk
438:talk
395:, a
384:Diva
371:Keep
334:talk
313:talk
260:-- –
251:Note
219:talk
205:talk
169:FENS
143:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
58:Talk
46:keep
409:in
399:in
391:in
381:in
183:TWL
120:– (
567:)
550:)
523:)
515:.
503:)
464:NW
440:)
387:,
336:)
315:)
268:|
257:.
227:)
197:."
163:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
51:NW
48:.
563:(
546:(
519:(
499:(
474:)
468:(
436:(
353:♪
332:(
311:(
236:,
222:·
217:(
208:·
203:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
118:)
80:(
61:)
55:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.