171:, it appears that there are plenty of academic resources from which to create an article. The topic is unquestionably of suitable academic value. HOWEVER - take a look at the history. Nobody has tried to modify the article in two years. Having a stub that absolutely nobody is interested in expanding isn't helpful. If someone wanted to take this on, it would be an obvious keep, but as it is, it isn't doing anyone any good.
325:
as pointed out by Angus (nice work there A)... text was lifted from the link he posted above. I've tagged listed this as a copyright violation and it should be treated as such. As a subject, this might be worthy of an article if anyone cares to research and write a new article with verifiable
127:
without prejudice. There's a topic, but this is a copyvio (well spotted, Angus!), so the best course of action would be to remove it and allow for an untainted article to be written (should someone choose to later).
222:
per BigDT. The subject of the article is notable, but considering the article hasn't been changed since it was originally created two years ago, there's a good chance it never will be. --
84:
Orphaned article, same couple of sentences years later and still no corresponding French article. Nothing links here either. It seems like a non-notable-philosophy. 2nd vote (see
380:
I rewrote a stub, but it lacks context and I could only explain n-P by quoting the originator because it's just word salad to me in
English and French; needs expert attention.
338:
as it is a
Copyvio as pointed out by Isotope23 and Angus. Article is still valid but it may be hard-pressed to find more material and external sources for this. --
275:. This has the potential to be an interesting article, and the subject seems notable enough. The article's just been neglected over time. --
62:
310:- two years with no movement tells me it's largely unknown everywhere. We can't document things that cannot be verifyed and expanded. -
108:
387:
372:
360:
348:
330:
317:
298:
279:
267:
250:
238:
226:
214:
202:
175:
157:
135:
118:
92:
72:
194:
67:
17:
198:
210:
and recreate with actual content if there's interest. Seems fitting that a non-philosophy should have a non-article.
234:... a veeeeeeeeery rare going-against-the-grain keep and vote from me. Appears to be notable philosophical position
405:
36:
404:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
384:
295:
357:
262:
211:
190:
104:
314:
85:
52:
49:
381:
292:
288:
169:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
259:
343:
247:
223:
185:
327:
311:
276:
78:
147:
AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
129:
112:
369:
89:
235:
246:
I learned something interesting from the short stub there. Learning is good. --
339:
172:
154:
183:
a non-starter and not a valid topic. Article about
Laruelle's essay. -
287:
unless my eyes deceive me, the current content appears to come from
107:
and add some biographical detail; the author appears notable (see
398:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
153:
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
408:). No further edits should be made to this page.
111:) but there's no evidence that the theory is.
8:
308:largely unknown in the Anglophone academy
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
44:The result of the debate was
425:
73:22:42, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
401:Please do not modify it.
388:23:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
373:03:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
361:18:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
349:17:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
331:13:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
318:12:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
299:10:29, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
280:09:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
268:07:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
251:03:03, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
239:02:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
227:02:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
215:02:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
203:01:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
176:01:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
158:00:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
136:21:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
119:23:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
93:17:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
86:Talk:Non-philosophy
368:per Coredesat. --
356:per Coredesat. --
347:
201:
160:
105:François Laruelle
416:
403:
341:
336:Keep but rewrite
265:
212:Opabinia regalis
189:
152:
148:
132:
123:Changed vote to
115:
70:
65:
60:
55:
34:
424:
423:
419:
418:
417:
415:
414:
413:
412:
406:deletion review
399:
378:Keep and expand
366:Keep and Expand
354:Keep and expand
273:Keep and expand
263:
244:Keep and expand
232:Keep and Expand
146:
130:
113:
82:
68:
63:
58:
53:
46:keep and expand
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
422:
420:
411:
410:
393:
391:
390:
382:Angus McLellan
375:
363:
358:209.89.123.231
351:
333:
320:
301:
293:Angus McLellan
282:
270:
253:
241:
229:
217:
205:
178:
166:Very Weak Keep
162:
161:
151:
141:
140:
139:
138:
109:Google Scholar
81:
79:Non-philosophy
76:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
421:
409:
407:
402:
396:
395:
394:
389:
386:
383:
379:
376:
374:
371:
367:
364:
362:
359:
355:
352:
350:
345:
340:
337:
334:
332:
329:
324:
321:
319:
316:
313:
309:
305:
302:
300:
297:
294:
290:
286:
283:
281:
278:
274:
271:
269:
266:
261:
257:
254:
252:
249:
245:
242:
240:
237:
233:
230:
228:
225:
221:
218:
216:
213:
209:
206:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
187:
182:
179:
177:
174:
170:
167:
164:
163:
159:
156:
150:
149:
143:
142:
137:
134:
126:
122:
121:
120:
117:
110:
106:
102:
101:
97:
96:
95:
94:
91:
87:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
400:
397:
392:
377:
365:
353:
335:
326:sources...--
322:
307:
303:
284:
272:
255:
243:
231:
219:
207:
186:CrazyRussian
184:
180:
165:
145:
144:
124:
99:
98:
83:
45:
43:
31:
28:
260:Computerjoe
168:- Googling
258:per above
248:SeizureDog
224:Kicking222
328:Isotope23
312:Peripitus
277:Coredesat
256:Weak keep
220:Weak keep
195:contribs
370:Ephilei
323:Copyvio
285:Comment
264:'s talk
133:iggurat
116:iggurat
90:Rudykog
50:King of
385:(Talk)
315:(Talk)
304:Delete
296:(Talk)
291:page.
236:Bwithh
208:Delete
181:Delete
125:delete
100:Rename
199:email
173:BigDT
16:<
344:tag?
289:this
191:talk
155:Ezeu
88:) -
103:to
306:-
48:.
346:)
342:(
197:/
193:/
131:Z
114:Z
69:♠
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.