231:
Why not? Knowledge (XXG) is not paper. Obviously, smaller municipalities if they have articles, should be merged with other in their county or census division, but in the case of
Norfolk, it's an entire census division, so it's too large to merge with anything else. --
170:. I realize Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball, but if you've actually spent two seconds in Knowledge (XXG), one would realize how many articles we have on future elections. Just try and delete
202:
Well, that's a matter of debate. It's my personal opinion, that
Norfolk County qualifies. It should also be noted that this isn't even the smallest municipality with its own election article. --
266:. In time, however, I hope that many of these articles can be merged, so tht this year's election page and the next election page and so on and on might become simply one page.
80:. There are a number of other articles on municipal elections in other cities (check the category), and they give coverage and information to those interested in politics.
94:
I see the cat, although I'd like to see what happens with this afd before proceeding with a larger scale afd. I don't believe county level elections are notable enough.
159:
58:
282:
270:
254:
240:
226:
210:
197:
182:
162:
136:
127:
115:
101:
89:
71:
52:
123:
per nom. This is crystalballing as well - the election hasn't even started yet. What's more, Norfolk county only has a population of .
17:
171:
155:
299:
36:
64:
A county municipal election is not notable enough for me. If there is a guideline for this, I couldn't find it.
111:
agree with nom. Are we going to have coverage of every local election in every jurisdiction across ther globe?
298:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
151:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
222:. Do we need to report on Wiki the results of every election? I don't think so. Let's avoid electioncruft.
132:
Um, no, not crystal-balling. These people are running, as the time for new candidates has been cut off. --
190:, that's a national election though. This article is for just one small county. How small will we go?
237:
207:
179:
250:
Factual, verifiable, and most importantly keeps people civicly minded in an era of indifference. --
84:
49:
267:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
280:
233:
223:
203:
195:
175:
124:
99:
69:
147:
81:
112:
263:
251:
133:
276:
191:
95:
65:
275:
So that it becomes a huge maintenance task? Why not just start it that way?
292:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
150:
article, so I would keep it as a stand-lone article. --
146:. This is probably too large a topic to add to the
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
302:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
59:Norfolk County municipal election, 2006
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
172:U.S. Presidential election, 2008
1:
283:22:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
271:21:45, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
255:20:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
241:17:44, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
227:17:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
211:07:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
198:21:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
183:18:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
163:07:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
137:20:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
128:06:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
116:16:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
102:10:26, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
90:09:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
72:08:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
53:14:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
319:
295:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
152:TruthbringerToronto
87:
310:
297:
85:
34:
318:
317:
313:
312:
311:
309:
308:
307:
306:
300:deletion review
293:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
316:
314:
305:
304:
288:
287:
286:
285:
257:
245:
244:
243:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
165:
148:Norfolk County
141:
140:
139:
118:
106:
105:
104:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
315:
303:
301:
296:
290:
289:
284:
281:
278:
274:
273:
272:
269:
268:Badbilltucker
265:
261:
258:
256:
253:
249:
246:
242:
239:
235:
230:
229:
228:
225:
221:
218:
212:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
196:
193:
189:
186:
185:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
164:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
142:
138:
135:
131:
130:
129:
126:
122:
119:
117:
114:
110:
107:
103:
100:
97:
93:
92:
91:
88:
83:
79:
76:
75:
74:
73:
70:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
294:
291:
259:
247:
219:
187:
167:
143:
120:
108:
77:
63:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
234:Earl Andrew
224:Vegaswikian
204:Earl Andrew
176:Earl Andrew
125:Ultra-Loser
48:to delete.
160:contribs)
82:Sjakkalle
113:Eusebeus
86:(Check!)
264:Zanimum
262:as per
252:Zanimum
188:Comment
134:Zanimum
50:W.marsh
277:Dismas
220:Delete
192:Dismas
121:Delete
109:Delete
96:Dismas
66:Dismas
248:Keep.
174:. --
16:<
260:Keep
238:talk
208:talk
180:talk
168:Keep
156:Talk
144:Keep
78:Keep
236:-
206:-
178:-
158:|
279:|
194:|
154:(
98:|
68:|
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.