550:. No case for passing PORNBIO. The claim that she passes the GNG rests entirely on two extremely brief articles reporting only superficial biographical information. Both articles are minimal, existing primarily as a hook on which to hang galleries of cheesecake photos of the subject -- in other words, clickbait. It's also rather curious that the
767:
points out its reputation for "misconduct and disregard for the rules of journalistic ethics" and "the administration of untruth and creat fictional material". What's happened here is fairly straightforward: a flurry of posts on social media claimed (without any credible evidence) that the winner of
500:
Fakt is characterised by its downmarket, often sensationalist journalism with a populist appeal...Fakt has been subjected to criticism concerning its style of journalism from media watchdogs. Twice so far, the
Association of Polish Journalists awarded Fakt with its "Hyena Of The Year" award for
477:
is, in fact, a
Pulitzer Prize-winning tabloid. You've rightly pointed out that tabloid journalism doesn't count towards an event's notability. This biography, however, has two articles from newspapers that are tabloids. If you want to make the argument that these two articles represent tabloid
798:"Tabloid or yellow journalism is usually considered a poor basis for an encyclopedia article, due to the lack of fact checking inherent in sensationalist and scandal mongering news reporting. Per policy, Knowledge (XXG) is not for scandal mongering or gossip.
764:. There's no reason to cast aspersions here; I could just as easily apply the term "lazy" to editors who simply assume a publication is reliable even though its extensively referenced native-language Knowledge (XXG) article
456:
is usually considered a poor basis for an encyclopedia article, due to the lack of fact checking inherent in sensationalist and scandal mongering news reporting. Per policy, Knowledge (XXG) is not for scandal mongering or
765:
163:
229:
249:
706:
with significant coverage in reliable mainstream Polish media. Some of the sources are in the tabloid format, which does not degrade their reliability. Some "delete" votes above are confusing
771:
seems to be the starting point, apparently based only on visual resemblances in a few photos. Sources which base their reporting on social media aren't reliable, and can't support a BLP.
116:
157:
735:
it fails GNG? Notability is demonstrated as per the Polish sources and I am sure other refs could be found if we looked. Deleting this would be as silly as deleting
554:
piece describes her as the only Pole with a significant role in the US porn industry, effectively denying the existence of her sister (who is discussed in the
209:
683:
731:
per Irn's rationale. These porn AfDs are becoming increasingly lazy. "Fails GNG" when there is clearly some claim to notability. How about explaining
123:
644:
Tabloids are generally poor in terms of quality reporting, fact-checking, and reputation, thus they are frowned upon when considering what is a
206:
739:, who just like Natalia Starr may not be notable in the U.S., but is definitely notable in Sweden. World wide fame is not a criteria of
308:
290:
648:
to determine a subject's notability. Without the tabloid name-drops, there's nothing to satisfy the project's notability threshold.
17:
89:
84:
93:
776:
563:
558:
piece). With only these two flimsy and inconsistent articles cited, it's difficult to see how BLP/GNG requirements can be met.
76:
178:
769:
332:
145:
576:
478:
journalism, you are free to do so, but the mere fact that they are from a tabloid-style newspaper is not sufficient. --
832:
40:
610:- notable, popular in Poland. Also, nominations for awards, 9x interwiki, good quality article, not stub.... - keep.
772:
707:
559:
621:
690:
378:
139:
328:
314:
381:- not necessarily reliable enough for a BLP issue, but they certainly meet the standard for notability. --
813:
780:
752:
723:
694:
674:
657:
634:
600:
567:
530:
487:
468:
417:
399:
390:
357:
336:
319:
294:
261:
241:
221:
198:
135:
58:
793:
447:
344:
as passes PORNBIO & GNG, Ofcourse as always this !vote has absolutely nothing to do with her looks. –
828:
719:
405:
285:
80:
54:
36:
612:
185:
435:
273:
686:
171:
72:
64:
711:
670:
598:
586:
304:
809:
526:
464:
257:
237:
217:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
827:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
715:
740:
703:
281:
277:
151:
501:"particular unscrupulousness and neglect of the principles of the journalistic work ethic"
645:
748:
653:
345:
768:
a quite minor beauty pageant ("Miss
Polonia Manhattan") had become a porn performer. (
666:
591:
505:
483:
413:
386:
374:
370:
805:
522:
460:
396:
253:
233:
213:
195:
110:
736:
434:
You're mistaken. "Tabloid" is a type of journalism. I'd like to point you to
744:
649:
479:
409:
382:
302:: seems to have Polish coverage, but it'll need competent eyes to check.
440:
routine news coverage of such things as announcements, sports, and
821:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
494:
366:
373:
are both legitimate newspapers on par with something like the
579:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
230:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
473:
Tabloids and tabloid journalism are not the same thing. The
515:, Super Express adjusted its profile to become (similar to
250:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
511:"Since 2007, with the new editor-in-chief formerly from
395:
tabloids are Not generally accepted As passing the gng.
106:
102:
98:
682:
per Irn. Covered by Polish reliable sources including
170:
627:
585:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
184:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
835:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
248:Note: This debate has been included in the
228:Note: This debate has been included in the
247:
227:
519:) "a noble version of the tabloid daily"
444:are not sufficient basis for an article.
408:is a Pulitzer Prize-winning tabloid. --
205:Note: This debate has been added to the
773:The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)
560:The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo)
665:Per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz & Tarc.
327:Notable, fame, popularity in Poland.--
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
404:Tabloid is a physical format. The
24:
714:, which aren't the same thing.
1:
454:Tabloid or yellow journalism
814:23:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
781:23:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
753:16:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
724:06:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
695:04:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
675:18:58, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
658:15:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
635:11:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
601:15:34, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
568:01:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
531:15:14, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
488:04:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
469:03:10, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
418:15:52, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
400:08:50, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
391:18:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
358:17:28, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
337:06:14, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
320:18:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
295:01:48, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
262:18:45, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
242:18:45, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
222:18:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
199:18:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
59:00:25, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
852:
708:Tabloid (newspaper format)
804:, not any odd guideline.
824:Please do not modify it.
194:Fails PORNBIO & GNG
32:Please do not modify it.
207:WikiProject Pornography
365:From what I can tell,
743:, as far as I know.
406:New York Daily News
712:Tabloid journalism
442:tabloid journalism
329:Hillary Scott`love
630:
603:
307:
264:
244:
210:list of deletions
843:
826:
633:
632:
631:
628:
624:
618:
617:
596:
589:
584:
582:
580:
355:
350:
317:
311:
303:
224:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
57:
34:
851:
850:
846:
845:
844:
842:
841:
840:
839:
833:deletion review
822:
646:reliable source
622:
620:
615:
613:
611:
604:
592:
587:
575:
573:
438:where it says "
351:
346:
315:
309:
293:
204:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
849:
847:
838:
837:
817:
816:
786:
785:
784:
783:
756:
755:
726:
697:
687:Morbidthoughts
677:
660:
638:
637:
626:
583:
572:
571:
570:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
450:where it says
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
360:
339:
322:
297:
289:
266:
265:
245:
225:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
848:
836:
834:
830:
825:
819:
818:
815:
811:
807:
803:
799:
795:
791:
788:
787:
782:
778:
774:
770:
766:
763:
760:
759:
758:
757:
754:
750:
746:
742:
738:
734:
730:
727:
725:
721:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
698:
696:
692:
688:
684:
681:
678:
676:
672:
668:
664:
661:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
639:
636:
625:
619:
609:
606:
605:
602:
599:
597:
595:
590:
581:
578:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
552:Super Express
549:
546:
545:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
507:
506:Super Express
502:
497:
496:
491:
490:
489:
485:
481:
476:
472:
471:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
449:
445:
443:
437:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
402:
401:
398:
394:
393:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
375:New York Post
372:
371:Super Express
368:
364:
361:
359:
356:
354:
349:
343:
340:
338:
334:
330:
326:
323:
321:
318:
312:
306:
301:
298:
296:
292:
287:
286:Malik Shabazz
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
246:
243:
239:
235:
231:
226:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
203:
202:
201:
200:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:Natalia Starr
70:
69:
66:
65:Natalia Starr
63:
61:
60:
56:
55:North America
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
823:
820:
801:
797:
794:WP:SENSATION
789:
761:
732:
728:
699:
679:
662:
641:
607:
593:
574:
555:
551:
547:
518:
514:
510:
504:
499:
493:
474:
453:
451:
448:WP:SENSATION
441:
439:
362:
352:
347:
341:
324:
299:
269:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
716:Rebecca1990
614:Subtropical
316:talk to me!
158:free images
800:" This is
737:Puma Swede
475:Daily News
436:WP:ROUTINE
274:WP:PORNBIO
829:talk page
492:You mean
446:" and to
254:• Gene93k
234:• Gene93k
214:• Gene93k
37:talk page
831:or in a
667:Finnegas
594:JAaron95
577:Relisted
310:contribs
117:View log
39:or in a
806:Kraxler
762:Comment
702:Passes
523:Kraxler
461:Kraxler
457:gossip.
397:Spartaz
377:or the
300:Comment
196:Spartaz
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
802:policy
790:Delete
741:WP:GNG
704:WP:GNG
663:Delete
642:Delete
629:(en-2)
548:Delete
503:) and
282:WP:GNG
280:, and
278:WP:BIO
272:Fails
270:Delete
136:Google
94:delete
710:with
348:Davey
305:FoCuS
291:Stalk
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
810:talk
792:per
777:talk
749:talk
745:Nymf
729:Keep
720:talk
700:Keep
691:talk
680:Keep
671:talk
654:talk
650:Tarc
623:talk
616:-man
608:Keep
564:talk
556:Fakt
527:talk
521:")?
517:Fakt
513:Fakt
495:Fakt
484:talk
465:talk
414:talk
387:talk
369:and
367:Fakt
363:Keep
353:2010
342:Keep
333:talk
325:Keep
284:. —
258:talk
238:talk
218:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
733:why
480:Irn
459:".
410:Irn
383:Irn
379:Sun
186:TWL
115:– (
52:.
812:)
796::
779:)
751:)
722:)
693:)
685:.
673:)
656:)
566:)
529:)
498:("
486:)
467:)
416:)
389:)
335:)
313:;
276:,
260:)
252:.
240:)
232:.
220:)
212:.
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
808:(
775:(
747:(
718:(
689:(
669:(
652:(
588:☮
562:(
525:(
509:(
482:(
463:(
452:"
412:(
385:(
331:(
288:/
256:(
236:(
216:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.