206:
the interview I found with her from 2014 in a totally non-reliable source did not seem to suggest she was in medical school, it mainly spent time posting pictures of her in bikinis. Her role as Miss
California USA is not enough to be notable, and her role in America's next top model, does not seem to cut it either. Her modeling career to date also does not seem to rise to the level of notability.
227:
from
October 2013 that suggests that Pack had not yet graduated from UC Irvine at that point. So she would not have started medical school until 2014 at the earliest. More to the point it is the level of coverage we are getting, and despite its attempts to say that Pack is a notable model, nothing it
205:
At some level I wish we could keep all articles on female doctors. However, Pack is not a female doctor as far as I can tell, and clearly no where near being a notable one. She was in her 3rd year of undergraduate studies at UC Irvine in 2012. She might be in her 3rd year of medical school, although
314:
I haven't even looked at the subsequent pages, these are three non-trivial articles by three national publications, over three years. And she was Miss
California 2012. And she was on America's Next Top Model, a national TV show. Honestly: "I wish we could keep all articles on female doctors"? She's
473:
as per above keep comments, plus a suggestion, given the nominator's boilerplate machine-gun AfD nominations of all beauty contestants -- nominations which cause the community a lot of work and checking -- and nominator AfDing articles without an ounce of checking
342:
As noted by GRuban, passes notability with the three sources he's provided. Nominator (who's created over 2 dozen boilerplate AfDs in the past week) is too focused on the occupation of the subject and not enough on the sourcing of the article.
174:
319:
meet notability standards as a lawyer. Strangely enough, not everyone becomes notable as what they went for university for. That's not a reason to delete an article about someone who clearly meets
425:
127:
246:
289:; clearly notable. Honestly, I question whether nominator has done a single Google search of the subject. Just the first page of the first link under "Find Sources" gives:
266:
168:
304:
65:
134:
61:
17:
100:
95:
369:
Given the information provided by GRuban. The coverage is there, and with exposure on ANTM, this to me would be a cinch to meet
104:
53:
189:
87:
57:
156:
506:
40:
350:
378:
315:
not a doctor, she's a model. Sure, she doesn't meet notability standards as a notable doctor. Well, neither does
233:
211:
433:
395:
150:
355:
274:
254:
225:
146:
502:
487:
465:
437:
416:
399:
382:
361:
345:
332:
278:
258:
237:
215:
69:
36:
483:
479:
374:
292:
229:
207:
196:
461:
429:
391:
182:
475:
270:
250:
453:
412:
298:
91:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
501:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
328:
449:
370:
320:
162:
457:
408:
316:
83:
75:
121:
324:
305:
Guess model
Natalie Pack looks like Cindy Crawford, but wants to be herself
293:
Model
Natalie Pack's Fomo-Inducing Instagram Feed Has It All | GQ
495:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
478:, that administrators restrict his power to propose AfDs.--
117:
113:
109:
181:
407:
per above reasons, and the examples posted by GRuban.
426:
list of Beauty
Pageants-related deletion discussions
195:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
509:). No further edits should be made to this page.
299:Instagram Girl of the Week: Natalie Pack - Maxim
247:list of California-related deletion discussions
8:
424:Note: This debate has been included in the
267:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions
265:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
423:
264:
244:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
488:00:29, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
70:14:50, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
448:per GRuban's sources. Meets
466:23:32, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
438:00:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
417:11:42, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
400:00:22, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
383:12:28, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
362:12:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
333:20:40, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
279:14:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
259:14:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
238:23:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
228:says suggests to me she is.
216:23:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
526:
498:Please do not modify it.
58:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga
32:Please do not modify it.
440:
281:
261:
230:John Pack Lambert
208:John Pack Lambert
54:non-admin closure
517:
500:
360:
358:
353:
348:
301:That's from 2014
295:That's from 2016
224:We do have this
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
34:
525:
524:
520:
519:
518:
516:
515:
514:
513:
507:deletion review
496:
375:RickinBaltimore
356:
351:
346:
344:
307:Fox News, 2015.
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
523:
521:
512:
511:
491:
490:
468:
442:
441:
430:PageantUpdater
420:
419:
402:
392:PageantUpdater
385:
364:
336:
335:
311:
310:
309:
308:
302:
296:
283:
282:
262:
241:
240:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
522:
510:
508:
504:
499:
493:
492:
489:
485:
481:
477:
472:
469:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
444:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
422:
421:
418:
414:
410:
409:Glenn Francis
406:
403:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
365:
363:
359:
354:
349:
341:
338:
337:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
313:
312:
306:
303:
300:
297:
294:
291:
290:
288:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:Coolabahapple
268:
263:
260:
256:
252:
251:Coolabahapple
248:
243:
242:
239:
235:
231:
226:
223:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
497:
494:
470:
445:
404:
387:
366:
339:
317:Barack Obama
286:
221:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
84:Natalie Pack
76:Natalie Pack
49:
47:
31:
28:
287:Strong Keep
169:free images
56:) Regards,
480:Tomwsulcer
476:beforehand
390:Per above
503:talk page
458:Ejgreen77
37:talk page
505:or in a
454:WP:BASIC
128:View log
39:or in a
222:Comment
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
450:WP:GNG
371:WP:GNG
325:GRuban
321:WP:GNG
147:Google
105:delete
340:Keep:
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
484:talk
471:Keep
462:talk
452:and
446:Keep
434:talk
413:talk
405:Keep
396:talk
388:Keep
379:talk
367:Keep
329:talk
323:. --
275:talk
255:talk
234:talk
212:talk
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
66:mail
62:talk
50:keep
197:TWL
126:– (
52:. (
486:)
464:)
456:.
436:)
428:.
415:)
398:)
381:)
373:.
331:)
277:)
269:.
257:)
249:.
236:)
214:)
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
68:)
64:•
482:(
460:(
432:(
411:(
394:(
377:(
357:p
352:b
347:p
327:(
273:(
253:(
232:(
210:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.