452:
There can't be two women with the same name - as Lunghi is an unusual name, so I hope so. I actually feel quite bad about nominating this article for deletion. It was done in a rash moment, and as a response to comments made on the afd discussion for
Natasha Collins. Am I allowed to withdraw the afd
191:
Although these are short articles, I believe both these actors are noteworthy, and the information on them will expand over time. I will happily do this, but would need to do some research on the subject first. For now though, I will point out that Rowan Joffe in particular has received nominstions
372:
Which is one of the reasons I created the article in the first place. I'm actually in favour of it being kept, but feel a redirect is preferable to a delete. The article can always be reprised as her career progresses and more information on her becomes available.
343:
I can see this point but disagree. I found the existence of this article useful simply so as to find out whether
Nathalie Lunghi is related to Cherie Lunghi or whether the unusual surname was just a coincidence. So I think this article should remain.
260:
The former's award nominations and press coverage (both recent and in the past) suggest he will go on to affirm and increase his notability. The latter is, I'm afraid, merely a name in a credits list (for the time being—things can change).
292:. Then mention something about Nathalie in her mother's article. Something along the lines of "Cherie's daughter, Nathalie, is also an actress. Her roles include . . ." Seems a fair enough solution to me.
396:
115:
468:
122:
A very short article which does not assert her notability. Although her parents are well established actors in their own right, her imdb entry only has three credits
192:
snd awards for his work as a director; while
Nathalie Lunghi has had roles in some notable films. On top of this, they have notable parents -
48:
Rowan Joffe's BAFTA awards and nominations make him notable, while
Nathalie Lunghi's starring role in new ITV1 drama also makes her notable.
359:
136:
I am also nominating the following related pages because, again, it is a very short article and the actor has only a handful of credits]:
88:
83:
442:
158:
153:
92:
17:
162:
75:
145:
499:
36:
421:
498:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
355:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
309:
Actually, I see
Nathalie does have a mention there, but more could be made of it in the way I have suggested.
480:
462:
446:
411:
382:
363:
335:
318:
301:
270:
242:
217:
131:
57:
430:
347:
476:
438:
238:
266:
79:
427:, an ITV series due to start on Monday? (And if so, does that have a bearing on this discussion?)
378:
351:
331:
213:
149:
310:
293:
454:
405:
123:
49:
472:
434:
314:
297:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
458:
127:
53:
285:
262:
257:
71:
63:
374:
327:
250:
209:
201:
141:
289:
197:
193:
179:
109:
278:
205:
233:
Nathalie, notability is not inherited, and her roles are much too small.
226:
492:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
397:
list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions
175:
171:
167:
105:
101:
97:
326:
I think that's a good compromise. I'd support that.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
502:). No further edits should be made to this page.
200:in Nathalie Lunghi's case, and Rowan Joffe and
8:
395:: This debate has been included in the
467:I think withdrawing is allowed? I've
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
420:Is this the same Nathalie Lunghi as
479:) (remembering to sign this time)
24:
1:
481:23:55, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
463:23:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
447:21:36, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
383:12:40, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
364:09:44, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
58:00:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
412:20:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
336:12:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
319:16:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
302:16:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
271:14:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
243:14:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
218:21:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
132:20:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
519:
422:the one about to star in
495:Please do not modify it.
229:awards and nominations.
32:Please do not modify it.
469:seen other people do it
449:
433:comment added by
414:
409:
400:
366:
350:comment added by
225:for Rowan due to
510:
497:
428:
403:
402:—User:Ceyockey (
401:
391:
345:
183:
165:
113:
95:
34:
518:
517:
513:
512:
511:
509:
508:
507:
506:
500:deletion review
493:
286:Nathalie Lunghi
258:Nathalie Lunghi
156:
140:
86:
72:Nathalie Lunghi
70:
67:
64:Nathalie Lunghi
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
516:
514:
505:
504:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
415:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
352:Browne-Windsor
338:
321:
273:
245:
220:
202:Jane Lapotaire
185:
184:
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
515:
503:
501:
496:
490:
489:
482:
478:
474:
471:, anyway. --
470:
466:
465:
464:
460:
456:
451:
450:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
426:
425:
419:
416:
413:
408:
407:
398:
394:
390:
384:
380:
376:
371:
368:
367:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
342:
339:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:Cherie Lunghi
287:
284:
280:
277:
274:
272:
268:
264:
259:
256:
252:
249:
246:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
221:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:Cherie Lunghi
195:
190:
187:
186:
181:
177:
173:
169:
164:
160:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
138:
137:
134:
133:
129:
125:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
494:
491:
473:KittyRainbow
453:nomination?
435:KittyRainbow
423:
417:
404:
392:
369:
340:
323:
306:
282:
275:
254:
247:
235:Clarityfiend
230:
222:
194:Roland Joffe
188:
135:
121:
45:
43:
31:
28:
429:—Preceding
346:—Preceding
279:Rowan Joffe
251:Rowan Joffé
206:Rowan Joffe
142:Rowan Joffé
424:The Palace
406:talk to me
263:Popplewick
375:Paul20070
328:Paul20070
223:Weak keep
210:Paul20070
208:'s case.
443:contribs
431:unsigned
360:contribs
348:unsigned
283:Redirect
116:View log
46:withdraw
418:Comment
370:Comment
341:Comment
324:Comment
311:Brochco
307:Comment
294:Brochco
159:protect
154:history
89:protect
84:history
455:Egdirf
255:Delete
231:Delete
163:delete
124:Egdirf
93:delete
50:Egdirf
227:BAFTA
180:views
172:watch
168:links
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
477:talk
459:talk
439:talk
393:Note
379:talk
356:talk
332:talk
315:talk
298:talk
281:and
276:Keep
267:talk
248:Keep
239:talk
214:talk
196:and
189:Keep
176:logs
150:talk
146:edit
128:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
399:.
288:to
204:in
114:– (
461:)
445:)
441:•
410:)
381:)
362:)
358:•
334:)
317:)
300:)
269:)
261:--
253:,
241:)
216:)
178:|
174:|
170:|
166:|
161:|
157:|
152:|
148:|
130:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
475:(
457:(
437:(
377:(
354:(
330:(
313:(
296:(
265:(
237:(
212:(
182:)
144:(
126:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.