Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (2nd nomination) - Knowledge

Source 📝

165:". I disagree that an appearance at the FIFA Under-17 World Cup makes a player notable by those criteria, despite the competition being an "officially sanctioned international competition", as it is not a fully professional competition, nor is it the highest level of football. It may be the highest level of football for that age group, but there are hundreds of players who have played at the Under-17 World Cup (an annual competition, compared to the quadrennial senior FIFA World Cup), but never went on to have a fully professional career. The other case for Porritt's notability was his involvement in the 2006 tapping-up case involving 339:- Perhaps in the future, but "Knowledge is not a Crystal Ball" and thus putting a page in now is a tad premature. If there are 158+ links/references, then userfying this article, expanding it with references, and then recreating it in a way that solidly references it to show notability would probably be the best option. This is borderline, though, I will give it that and I could see it legitimately falling either way. 216:
does state that it includes Youth players in international sanctioned competition (i.e. FIFA). That was my point in removing the PROD, anyway. It was never based on the corruption allegation, per WP:NOTNEWS.
95: 90: 85: 356:
I would say that by a very broad definition of "highest levels of amateur sport" allow Porritt to qualify as per Knowledge:BIO... meanwhile, Google turns up a few writings about the guy, like
380:
The two factors combined make it worth keeping for now, if he disappears in 3 years time that may be the time to get rid of it, however for now there is an argument for keeping the article.
150: 174: 79: 173:. In the original AfD for this article, this was not deemed to be notable enough for Porritt to have his own article, and instead it was made into a redirect to 286:- would ANY/ALL players on a professional sports team inherently be notable? (I ask because I've seen some that are questionable but are pro...) 357: 123: 118: 127: 389: 370: 348: 331: 303: 278: 248: 226: 202: 184: 61: 273: 243: 110: 17: 360: 192: 157:
Contested PROD. Original concern was "No evidence that the player meets notability criteria for sportspeople as laid down at
222: 407: 36: 294:
Appearances in youth competitions don't merit a place. He has to make first team appearances for a major club.
406:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
344: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
299: 218: 232:
Note that the policy you refer to has been rejected by the community, and therefore is null and void.
366: 340: 268: 238: 199: 181: 114: 55: 319:
and the BBC. Regardless of the merits of his resume as a soccer player, he seems to clear the
295: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
213: 162: 362: 385: 324: 263: 233: 196: 178: 106: 67: 259: 170: 158: 50: 166: 161:". PROD was removed with the reasoning "FIFA U-17 World Cup apperance alone meets 144: 320: 381: 315:
hits on Google UK. 158 hits on UK Google News, including cites from the
400:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
48:
to delete. Some fair points on both sides of the discussion.--
140: 136: 132: 262:
as he has not played in a fully professional league.
96:
Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (3rd nomination)
91:
Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (2nd nomination)
86:
Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (1st nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 195:'s list of football (soccer) related deletions. – 175:2006 allegations of corruption in English football 410:). No further edits should be made to this page. 177:. This argument should still hold true today. – 8: 76: 191:This discussion has been included in 7: 80:Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt 74: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 212:The section on footballers at 1: 349:04:14, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 332:04:08, 27 December 2007 (UTC) 304:23:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 279:21:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 249:21:08, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 227:20:52, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 203:20:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 185:20:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 390:18:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC) 371:03:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 62:18:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC) 427: 403:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 73:AfDs for this article: 193:WikiProject Football 311:Over three hundred 219:Shawn in Montreal 205: 418: 405: 328: 276: 271: 266: 246: 241: 236: 190: 148: 130: 60: 34: 426: 425: 421: 420: 419: 417: 416: 415: 414: 408:deletion review 401: 326: 274: 269: 264: 244: 239: 234: 121: 105: 102: 100: 82: 71: 49: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 424: 422: 413: 412: 395: 393: 392: 374: 373: 351: 341:VigilancePrime 334: 306: 289: 288: 287: 252: 251: 207: 206: 155: 154: 107:Nathan Porritt 101: 99: 98: 93: 88: 83: 78: 75: 72: 70: 68:Nathan Porritt 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 423: 411: 409: 404: 398: 397: 396: 391: 387: 383: 379: 376: 375: 372: 368: 364: 361: 358: 355: 352: 350: 346: 342: 338: 335: 333: 330: 329: 322: 318: 314: 310: 307: 305: 301: 297: 293: 290: 285: 282: 281: 280: 277: 272: 267: 261: 257: 254: 253: 250: 247: 242: 237: 231: 230: 229: 228: 224: 220: 215: 211: 204: 201: 198: 194: 189: 188: 187: 186: 183: 180: 176: 172: 171:Frank Arnesen 168: 164: 160: 152: 146: 142: 138: 134: 129: 125: 120: 116: 112: 108: 104: 103: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 81: 77: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 57: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 402: 399: 394: 377: 353: 336: 325: 316: 312: 308: 296:Nick mallory 291: 283: 255: 209: 208: 167:Chelsea F.C. 156: 53: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 337:Weak Delete 363:Watchsmart 327:RGTraynor 378:Weak Keep 354:Weak Keep 317:Telegraph 214:WP:SPORTS 163:WP:SPORTS 284:Question 151:View log 51:Kubigula 124:protect 119:history 323:bar. 313:unique 292:Delete 265:пﮟოьεԻ 260:WP:BIO 258:Fails 256:Delete 235:пﮟოьεԻ 159:WP:BIO 128:delete 309:Keep: 145:views 137:watch 133:links 16:< 386:talk 382:Ashl 367:talk 359:and 345:talk 321:WP:V 300:talk 223:talk 210:Keep 141:logs 115:talk 111:edit 56:talk 200:Jay 197:Pee 182:Jay 179:Pee 169:'s 149:– ( 388:) 369:) 347:) 302:) 225:) 143:| 139:| 135:| 131:| 126:| 122:| 117:| 113:| 384:( 365:( 343:( 298:( 275:7 270:5 245:7 240:5 221:( 153:) 147:) 109:( 58:) 54:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Kubigula
talk
18:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Nathan Porritt
Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt
Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (1st nomination)
Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Nathan Porritt (3rd nomination)
Nathan Porritt
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:BIO
WP:SPORTS
Chelsea F.C.
Frank Arnesen
2006 allegations of corruption in English football
Pee
Jay
20:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Football

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.