276:. I'm not certain if this is the place for inserting these comments; however, I would argue that this is not G11 (blantantly advertising) or not notable. While it is not necessarily well written (WP:UGLY), it does not provide sufficient grounds for deletion, especially given the significance of the conference in unifying a field of research. The National Research Council of the National Academies organized a committee to explore the new discipline of network science and assess its value for basic and applied research investment opportunities (among other things). Their findings, which were published in 2005, came down strongly in favor of increasing investment in network science research opportunities. While one of the major challenges facing the new field was its disparate sources of funding, the other major challenge noted in the study was the fragmentation of the field. Because funding came from disparate locations, no dedicated conference, and no dedicated journals, research was fragmented, lost in jargon, and often duplicated in unproductive ways. The first conference, held in 2006 in Bloomington, IN, was formed in part to address these issues. In 2006 the same body commissioned and published another book, Strategy for an Army Center for Network Science, Technology, and Experimentation, which again underscored the importance of knowledge-centralizing conferences for establishing improving army (here representing a diverse group of governmental bodies) network-centric operations (NCOs). Both of these texts have been key in setting grant funding agency priorities over the past 10 years, many of which fund scholar participation in the Netsci Conference. Simply arguing something isn't notable isn't sufficient evidence to get it deleted (WP:JNN). This article has potential (WP:Potential) to develop into a more robust article. This year the Office of Secretary of Defense from the Department of Defense has created a Future Directions in Network Science (in September of 2016) to create a similar document, reviewing the accomplishments of the field and predicting challenges going forward. This document will also be circulated to set granting agency priorities. Unlike most popular culture events and individuals, reliable and independent coverage of academic institutions and events can take a long time to be printed. It is a part of the nature of the unique enclave that academia exists within. Given the context of the conference, its origins, and the timelines for governmental and academic publications, this is an article with potential (WP:Potential), and it should not be deleted. Instead, it should be revised to more properly demonstrate its significance.
173:
205:
227:
167:
126:
325:
National
Research Council. (2006). Strategy for an Army Center for Network Science, Technology, and Experimentation. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
133:
99:
94:
103:
86:
17:
188:
155:
300:
40:
149:
268:
248:
243:
219:
68:
145:
90:
195:
296:
36:
231:
181:
161:
316:
National
Research Council. (2005). Network Science. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
82:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
295:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
264:
61:
215:
120:
260:
210:
289:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
206:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Network
Science Society
116:
112:
108:
180:
194:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
303:). No further edits should be made to this page.
228:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
8:
226:Note: This debate has been included in the
225:
208:for a related article by the same editor.
204:Not notable, and highly promotional. See
309:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
259:: plenty of notable participants.
24:
1:
342:
269:15:00, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
69:03:28, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
292:Please do not modify it.
249:06:12, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
220:04:36, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
55:(non-admin closure)
251:
83:Netsci Conference
75:Netsci Conference
57:
333:
326:
323:
317:
314:
294:
246:
241:
199:
198:
184:
136:
124:
106:
67:
66:
64:
53:
34:
341:
340:
336:
335:
334:
332:
331:
330:
329:
324:
320:
315:
311:
307:
301:deletion review
290:
283:
244:
232:
141:
132:
97:
81:
78:
62:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
339:
337:
328:
327:
318:
308:
306:
305:
282:
279:
278:
277:
271:
253:
252:
202:
201:
138:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
338:
322:
319:
313:
310:
304:
302:
298:
293:
287:
286:
285:
280:
275:
272:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
254:
250:
247:
242:
239:
235:
229:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
212:
207:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
147:
144:
143:Find sources:
139:
135:
131:
128:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
321:
312:
291:
288:
284:
273:
256:
237:
233:
209:
203:
191:
185:
177:
170:
164:
158:
152:
142:
129:
49:
47:
31:
28:
168:free images
281:References
297:talk page
63:Music1201
37:talk page
299:or in a
127:View log
39:or in a
174:WP refs
162:scholar
100:protect
95:history
261:Leutha
240:wister
236:wister
146:Google
104:delete
216:talk
189:JSTOR
150:books
134:Stats
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
274:Keep
265:talk
257:Keep
245:talk
182:FENS
156:news
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
50:keep
211:DGG
196:TWL
125:– (
52:.
267:)
230:.
218:)
176:)
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
59:—
263:(
238:T
234:S
214:(
200:)
192:·
186:·
178:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
148:(
140:(
137:)
130:·
123:)
85:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.