457:. This seems to be in the same category as the efforts of so many high schoolers to get whatever they made up in class into Knowledge. I'd go with a combination of no context and, though it's not a specific CSD category, an unremarkable term re: the above comments. If I had to guess, I think this was made up in school one day...it just happened to be the professor making it up rather than the students.
354:: True, and I agree that being a recreation isn't solely a good reason, but given that it was recreated within an hour of being speedily deleted (whether properly or not) makes me wonder if there isn't a SPA or promotional account. And admittedly, the language isn't NPOV, or at least doesn't appear to be so.
324:
deleted material isn't, by itself, a reason for deletion, especially when the deletion reason was "attack page," which this is clearly not (though maybe the previous page was so butchered that it looked like one). Being unwilling to answer your efforts at discussion, though, is not a good sign.
377:. It's a long shot, but I'm going on for no context. It explains what it's for, but not only fails to give background (a dicdef by right), but fails also to give context to the already brief definition, in my opinion. I'll hold to
169:
124:
163:
299:: No evidence of notability, recreation of previously deleted article, user has not responded to message left inviting him to work with me on improving it.
212:(three results, all discussing Fine, two using the term in quotation marks). Not a presently notable term or concept. PROD contested without comment.
205:
129:
62:
394:
97:
92:
17:
209:
101:
184:
151:
84:
481:
36:
480:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
145:
201:
426:
336:
223:
141:
466:
449:
432:
416:
398:
363:
342:
308:
291:
270:
245:
229:
66:
390:
412:
287:
191:
177:
445:
462:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
200:
Neologism which does not appear to be in currency with anyone except
Cordelia Fine. See e.g.
359:
326:
304:
266:
239:
213:
208:(includes one other author, who put the term in quotation marks to indicate it is made up),
88:
382:
157:
408:
283:
53:
441:
279:
258:
49:
458:
118:
355:
300:
262:
242:
80:
72:
261:
if someone wishes to start an article about this notable academic.
474:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
114:
110:
106:
176:
401:, modified for structure 05:28, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
484:). No further edits should be made to this page.
190:
8:
7:
381:if that's refused by the admins. --
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
320:: FWIW, being a recreation of
1:
467:11:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
450:10:42, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
433:09:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
417:09:21, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
399:04:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
364:02:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
343:02:13, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
309:01:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
292:01:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
271:00:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
246:00:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
230:00:07, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
67:15:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
501:
477:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
52:and, to some degree,
455:Snow Speedy Delete
44:The result was
65:
492:
479:
429:
386:
385:Dennis The Tiger
339:
333:
226:
220:
195:
194:
180:
132:
122:
104:
61:
34:
500:
499:
495:
494:
493:
491:
490:
489:
488:
482:deletion review
475:
427:
407:madeup thing.
384:
337:
327:
224:
214:
137:
128:
95:
79:
76:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
498:
496:
487:
486:
470:
469:
452:
435:
419:
402:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
346:
345:
312:
311:
294:
273:
248:
198:
197:
134:
130:AfD statistics
75:
70:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
497:
485:
483:
478:
472:
471:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
434:
431:
430:
423:
420:
418:
414:
410:
406:
405:Speedy delete
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
387:
380:
376:
375:Speedy Delete
373:
372:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
348:
347:
344:
340:
334:
332:
329:
323:
319:
316:
315:
314:
313:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
274:
272:
268:
264:
260:
259:Cordelia Fine
256:
252:
249:
247:
244:
241:
237:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
221:
219:
216:
211:
210:GNews archive
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
59:
55:
51:
47:
46:Speedy Delete
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
476:
473:
454:
437:
428:Anna Lincoln
425:
421:
404:
383:
378:
374:
351:
331:
328:
321:
317:
296:
275:
254:
250:
235:
218:
215:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
58:UltraExactZZ
45:
43:
31:
28:
440:per above.
330:Glenfarclas
217:Glenfarclas
164:free images
81:Neurosexism
73:Neurosexism
238:: as per
409:JBsupreme
284:Joe Chill
240:WP:NOTDIC
50:WP:CSD#G3
442:Armbrust
322:speedily
255:redirect
206:GScholar
125:View log
459:Tyrenon
352:Comment
318:Comment
170:WP refs
158:scholar
98:protect
93:history
54:WP:SNOW
438:Delete
422:Delete
379:delete
356:Frmatt
301:Frmatt
297:Delete
280:WP:NEO
278:: Per
276:Delete
263:Pburka
251:Delete
243:Turgan
236:Delete
202:GBooks
142:Google
102:delete
395:stuff
185:JSTOR
146:books
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
463:talk
446:talk
413:talk
393:and
391:Rawr
360:talk
338:talk
305:talk
288:talk
267:talk
225:talk
178:FENS
152:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
48:per
257:to
253:or
192:TWL
127:•
123:– (
63:Did
465:)
448:)
424:.
415:)
397:)
362:)
341:)
307:)
290:)
282:.
269:)
228:)
204:,
172:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
56:.
461:(
444:(
411:(
389:(
358:(
335:(
303:(
286:(
265:(
222:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
121:)
83:(
60:~
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.