362:
NJFRW is a
Continuing Political Committee, an entirely different entity under NJ law. The National Federation of Republican Women has state affiliates, ALL of which are their own legal entities. It appears that the person who wants this deleted has a political agenda and is completely uninformed about the legalities of PPCs and CPCs in the State of NJ. --
401:
apps, and social media for those who do not have the technical knowledge to do so themselves, but it still requires the person contracting the programmer to provide content. No crime in that. Here, the content has been referenced and the content is paramount. And maybe they did make it themselves? We don't know for sure. Leave it be.–
232:, and (b) there really isn't much of a connection between past moderate office-holders of the 1950s, '60s and 70s, when the GOP in New Jersey was a completely different party of today's Christie machine. Thirdly, all of the references are primary sources, and we need at least two or three secondary sources
361:
This organization is its own legal entity under state and federal election laws. It is not related to or part of the NJ Republican
Committee. The NJ Republican Committee is formed under state statute as a Political Party Committee and its members stand for election on the ballot every two years. The
380:
There are lots of local and regional political parties and movements worldwide which are entities in their own right. They do not all deserve a listing, and in my view neither does this. But the reason that I nominated this article is that it appears that someone paid an editor to create it for some
400:
Shritwod: If the information provided is accurate, what difference does it make? Wiki is for everyone, not just those with technical knowledge. Maybe they did not how to use the program, or found the task daunting, but provided the content. There is an entire industry based on building websites,
415:
Knowledge (XXG) does not aim to catalog every possible item of human knowledge, there has to be some level of notability. And an internal regional subdivision of a subdivision of a US political party does not seem to meet those criteria. I can't see that this is of any interest except to people
52:. Rationale: AfD discussions are not a vote, and the strongest arguments here related to GNG, and then secondly to precedent with regard to any putative inherent notability. Legal entity status, on the other hand, does not relate to any policy-based argument.
163:
340:
These are all different organizations. The article is more than a list, and contains neutral content. Your reference to the 'Christie machine' might indicate that your desire to delete the page is motivated by more than pure intentions'
89:
84:
157:
93:
76:
278:
123:
258:
116:
298:
220:, which is its national organization. Firstly, the current article is really just a list of current female Republican office holders, and if kept, needs to be renamed
321:
We don;t normally even merge this material for state brnches of national organizations. the main organizations websitewill have the links if anyone wants information.
178:
443:
comes into play. Also, Madiesmith, you're only allowed one vote, so to avoid confusion I put a strikethrough your second use of bold for "Keep as is."
145:
217:
452:
425:
410:
390:
371:
353:
332:
310:
290:
270:
249:
203:
58:
139:
221:
135:
17:
80:
185:
72:
64:
471:
151:
40:
225:
229:
381:
reason, which brings into question its notability and also flags up an undeclared COI with the page creator.
467:
36:
367:
406:
402:
349:
345:
342:
56:
171:
448:
421:
386:
363:
199:
237:
306:
286:
266:
245:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
466:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
440:
233:
53:
444:
417:
382:
328:
195:
302:
282:
262:
241:
110:
323:
460:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
439:
per
Bearian, especially considering the sources aren't there so
228:. Secondly, while the individuals listed may be notable, (a)
106:
102:
98:
170:
224:, or redirected to a category page, or merged into
222:
List of female
Republican politicians in New Jersey
184:
279:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
474:). No further edits should be made to this page.
259:list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions
299:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
297:Note: This debate has been included in the
277:Note: This debate has been included in the
257:Note: This debate has been included in the
296:
276:
256:
73:New Jersey Federation of Republican Women
65:New Jersey Federation of Republican Women
218:National Federation of Republican Women
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
226:New Jersey Republican Committee
1:
230:notability is not inherited
491:
426:00:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
411:22:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
391:15:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
372:14:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
354:19:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
333:02:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
311:23:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
291:23:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
271:23:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
250:20:01, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
204:13:38, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
194:Non-notable organisation.
453:13:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
416:directly involved in it.
59:16:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
463:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
234:for general notability
48:The result was
313:
293:
273:
482:
465:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
490:
489:
485:
484:
483:
481:
480:
479:
478:
472:deletion review
461:
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
488:
486:
477:
476:
456:
455:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
393:
375:
374:
356:
335:
315:
314:
294:
274:
253:
252:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
487:
475:
473:
469:
464:
458:
457:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
435:
434:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
399:
398:
394:
392:
388:
384:
379:
378:
377:
376:
373:
369:
365:
360:
359:Do NOT Delete
357:
355:
351:
347:
344:
339:
336:
334:
330:
326:
325:
320:
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
295:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:, especially
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
462:
459:
436:
396:
395:
358:
343:• MadieSmith
337:
322:
318:
213:
209:
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
238:for a group
158:free images
403:Madiesmith
397:Keep As Is
346:Madiesmith
338:Keep As Is
54:j⚛e decker
468:talk page
303:• Gene93k
283:• Gene93k
263:• Gene93k
37:talk page
470:or in a
445:GRUcrule
418:Shritwod
383:Shritwod
196:Shritwod
117:View log
39:or in a
242:Bearian
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
441:WP:GNG
437:Delete
364:ChazNJ
319:Delete
210:Delete
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
329:talk
214:merge
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
449:talk
422:talk
407:talk
387:talk
368:talk
350:talk
307:talk
287:talk
267:talk
246:talk
200:talk
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
324:DGG
216:to
212:or
186:TWL
115:– (
451:)
424:)
409:)
389:)
370:)
352:)
331:)
309:)
301:.
289:)
281:.
269:)
261:.
248:)
240:.
202:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
447:(
420:(
405:(
385:(
366:(
348:(
327:(
305:(
285:(
265:(
244:(
198:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.