Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/NewsBank - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

486:. Clearly notable now, but then it was pretty obvious it was a notable topic before IMHO, though the prior article was poorly sourced. I could scarcely believe it when I saw this page had been deleted. I don't have time to monitor my Watchlist as closely as I once did (and certainly don't have time to recreate the page, so my thanks to 207:. I haven't seen the prior version of the article, so naturally the version I created, from scratch, uses completely different material. So far the article I've created incorporates cited material from sixteen (16) 242: 172: 352: 264: 125: 396: 330: 418: 308: 546: 440: 374: 286: 574:
the notability tag a few days before the PROD, and it was lost in my watchlist for me as well. An improved watchlist function is definitely an idea worth exploring.
166: 223:, bringing here to AFD to assess from the community whether we should bother to continue to perform quality improvement efforts on this article. Thank you. — 219:
of the company -- primarily as given in comments from authors of books about reference works and library guides. As there was the prior deletion after the
494:
and other deletion notices to be highlighted in some way on the Watchlist? Or even an option 'email me if a page on my Watchlist is up for deletion?'
132: 17: 98: 93: 602: 187: 40: 102: 154: 85: 62: 511:. A bit of a no-brainer. Clearly a notable topic, and clearly a well-written and well-referenced article. 148: 598: 551: 36: 144: 583: 570:. NewsBank provides a national-level news database used by libraries and news organizations. I had 555: 537: 520: 503: 478: 471: 454: 432: 410: 388: 366: 344: 322: 300: 278: 256: 234: 180: 67: 57: 516: 194: 533: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
597:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
566:- The sources in the article amply show that the organization is significant and notable per 491: 220: 204: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
567: 208: 56:, is considered notable and acceptable so the consensus will much likely be keep (NAC). 499: 466: 465:
Cirt has done an excellent job rebuilding an article about this notable topic. Thanks.
450: 428: 406: 384: 362: 340: 318: 296: 274: 252: 230: 160: 579: 512: 89: 529: 119: 495: 487: 445: 423: 401: 379: 357: 335: 313: 291: 269: 247: 225: 575: 81: 73: 53: 215:
of the company from approximately 1973 to 2014, as well as a bit about
528:
Appears to have sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources.
591:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
243:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
571: 115: 111: 107: 179: 203:
A prior version of this article was deleted after a
193: 353:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 605:). No further edits should be made to this page. 265:list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions 397:list of Technology-related deletion discussions 331:list of News media-related deletion discussions 419:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 309:list of Education-related deletion discussions 547:list of Business-related deletion discussions 441:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 375:list of Internet-related deletion discussions 8: 545:Note: This debate has been included in the 439:Note: This debate has been included in the 417:Note: This debate has been included in the 395:Note: This debate has been included in the 373:Note: This debate has been included in the 351:Note: This debate has been included in the 329:Note: This debate has been included in the 307:Note: This debate has been included in the 287:list of Florida-related deletion discussions 285:Note: This debate has been included in the 263:Note: This debate has been included in the 241:Note: This debate has been included in the 544: 438: 416: 394: 372: 350: 328: 306: 284: 262: 240: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 211:sources. I've demonstrated both a 24: 1: 584:22:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC) 556:15:56, 4 October 2015 (UTC) 538:17:59, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 521:10:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 504:07:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 479:05:23, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 455:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 433:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 411:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 389:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 367:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 345:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 323:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 301:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 279:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 257:04:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 235:04:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC) 68:05:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC) 622: 594:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 490:) — maybe a case for 558: 457: 435: 413: 391: 369: 347: 325: 303: 281: 259: 613: 596: 554: 476: 474:Let's discuss it 198: 197: 183: 135: 123: 105: 65: 60: 48:The result was 34: 621: 620: 616: 615: 614: 612: 611: 610: 609: 603:deletion review 592: 550: 472: 140: 131: 96: 80: 77: 63: 58: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 619: 617: 608: 607: 587: 586: 560: 559: 541: 540: 523: 506: 481: 459: 458: 436: 414: 392: 370: 348: 326: 304: 282: 260: 201: 200: 137: 76: 71: 59:SwisterTwister 52:as this, like 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 618: 606: 604: 600: 595: 589: 588: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 565: 562: 561: 557: 553: 552:North America 548: 543: 542: 539: 535: 531: 527: 524: 522: 518: 514: 510: 507: 505: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 482: 480: 477: 475: 470: 469: 464: 461: 460: 456: 452: 448: 447: 442: 437: 434: 430: 426: 425: 420: 415: 412: 408: 404: 403: 398: 393: 390: 386: 382: 381: 376: 371: 368: 364: 360: 359: 354: 349: 346: 342: 338: 337: 332: 327: 324: 320: 316: 315: 310: 305: 302: 298: 294: 293: 288: 283: 280: 276: 272: 271: 266: 261: 258: 254: 250: 249: 244: 239: 238: 237: 236: 232: 228: 227: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 196: 192: 189: 186: 182: 178: 174: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 146: 143: 142:Find sources: 138: 134: 130: 127: 121: 117: 113: 109: 104: 100: 95: 91: 87: 83: 79: 78: 75: 72: 70: 69: 66: 61: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 593: 590: 563: 525: 508: 483: 473: 467: 462: 444: 422: 400: 378: 356: 334: 312: 290: 268: 246: 224: 216: 212: 202: 190: 184: 176: 169: 163: 157: 151: 141: 128: 49: 47: 31: 28: 167:free images 599:talk page 217:Reception 37:talk page 601:or in a 513:GrindtXX 126:View log 82:NewsBank 74:NewsBank 54:Highbeam 39:or in a 572:removed 530:Nwlaw63 221:WP:PROD 213:History 205:WP:PROD 173:WP refs 161:scholar 99:protect 94:history 568:WP:ORG 468:Cullen 145:Google 103:delete 492:PRODs 209:WP:RS 188:JSTOR 149:books 133:Stats 120:views 112:watch 108:links 16:< 580:talk 564:Keep 534:talk 526:Keep 517:talk 509:Keep 500:talk 496:Qwfp 488:Cirt 484:Keep 463:Keep 451:talk 446:Cirt 443:. — 429:talk 424:Cirt 421:. — 407:talk 402:Cirt 399:. — 385:talk 380:Cirt 377:. — 363:talk 358:Cirt 355:. — 341:talk 336:Cirt 333:. — 319:talk 314:Cirt 311:. — 297:talk 292:Cirt 289:. — 275:talk 270:Cirt 267:. — 253:talk 248:Cirt 245:. — 231:talk 226:Cirt 181:FENS 155:news 116:logs 90:talk 86:edit 64:talk 50:Keep 576:Mz7 195:TWL 124:– ( 582:) 549:. 536:) 519:) 502:) 453:) 431:) 409:) 387:) 365:) 343:) 321:) 299:) 277:) 255:) 233:) 175:) 118:| 114:| 110:| 106:| 101:| 97:| 92:| 88:| 578:( 532:( 515:( 498:( 449:( 427:( 405:( 383:( 361:( 339:( 317:( 295:( 273:( 251:( 229:( 199:) 191:· 185:· 177:· 170:· 164:· 158:· 152:· 147:( 139:( 136:) 129:· 122:) 84:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Highbeam
SwisterTwister
talk
05:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
NewsBank
NewsBank
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:PROD

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.