211:." Prod was removed by author with the comment, "This article was proposed for deletion because of it's report-like nature. I have removed these sections to make it more encyclopedic in nature. This post is specific to Nepal which is important to genetically distinguish." Also, an IP post on the talk page said "There is indeed already a page on Juglans regia but it is very generalized and in microbiological terms, a Nepalese walnut can be very different than a general walnut. Distinguishing between them is therefore essential." However, it should be noted that the article does NOT make any genetic or other distinction between Nepalese and other walnuts, and the "report-like" material was NOT removed from the article - just a few section headings. IMO this is still an essay or commercial analysis, not suitable as a Knowledge article.
506:, just because you could dredge up some references to the half-dozen blokes running Christmas tree farms in SE Massachusetts. It's about as trivial and silly as you can get, and it bugs me that there are tens of thousands of articles on *real* subjects that could've really used the TLC this joke's gotten. I just don't see any legit policy grounds to delete. It's well sourced.
386:
develop walnuts as a commercial crop. With that speculation removed, we are left with an article about nothing - since Nepal does not currently produce a commercial walnut crop. Knowledge has no other "Walnut production in…" articles, not even for the major sources. (The world's top sources of walnuts are the US, China, and Iran, per
385:
It's nice that a lot of the cruft has been removed from the article. But does that mean that what remains is notable enough for an article? What we learn from the article is that Nepal currently has little or no commercial walnut production. The original article speculated about whether Nepal might
202:
This is not an encyclopedia article; it is an analysis of the commercial possibilities of growing walnuts in Nepal. I had prodded it saying "This is not an encyclopedia article; it is an essay or report about the commercial possibilities of walnut growing in Nepal. It is part of a recent cluster of
522:
I agree with
MelanieN - I don't see any evidence that this is a notable topic. Just because there are references that support the fact that walnuts exist and can be grown commercially (most of them) and even one or two that speculate that they MIGHT be growable in Nepal, there's still no evidence
453:
or whatever. But I don't see a reason to delete. The current article has a clearly defined topic and establishes sufficient facts about this topic by references to reliable sources. There being no articles about walnut production worldwide is a shame, but it's no reason to delete this article.
230:
per nom. It doesn't appear that there's a distinct "Nepalese" walnut. All we've got basically is that walnuts can be grown profitably in Nepal (nothing especially notable about that) and there's a odd law against cutting down walnut trees and selling the wood. All else is pretty generic walnut
171:
342:
124:
165:
362:
292:
131:
390:.) There is no good reason for us to have an article about walnut production in a country that is not a significant producer of walnuts! --
97:
92:
101:
253:(as edited). I gutted the article, and now I think it's worth keeping. Not the best article ever, but no need to trash it entirely.
84:
503:
186:
17:
316:
153:
204:
523:
that walnut production in a country that does not, in fact, commercially produce walnuts comes close to being notable.
271:
450:
147:
551:
40:
446:
532:
514:
488:
468:
428:
399:
374:
354:
333:
304:
283:
262:
245:
220:
66:
143:
484:
258:
241:
476:
547:
193:
88:
36:
179:
528:
463:
424:
395:
328:
300:
279:
216:
57:
480:
416:
408:
370:
350:
254:
237:
159:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
546:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
80:
72:
524:
455:
442:
434:
420:
412:
391:
320:
296:
275:
212:
208:
54:
366:
346:
118:
475:
I feel there is enough there for an article, but the new title is misleading.
502:
Yeah, I agree with
Melanie: this is absurd. This is like talking about
438:
387:
437:: this is a rather obscure topic, and I wouldn't mind a merge into
540:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
207:. We already have an article on this walnut species at
114:
110:
106:
178:
343:
list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
554:). No further edits should be made to this page.
419:: Any reaction or response to this comment? --
363:list of Business-related deletion discussions
192:
8:
504:Christmas Tree production in Plymouth County
361:Note: This debate has been included in the
341:Note: This debate has been included in the
291:Note: This debate has been included in the
360:
340:
293:list of Nepal-related deletion discussions
290:
7:
24:
479:better describes the contents.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
270:The article has been moved to
1:
533:16:07, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
515:19:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
489:03:03, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
469:22:36, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
429:20:55, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
400:08:38, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
375:23:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
355:23:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
334:19:40, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
305:16:11, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
284:16:04, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
263:07:09, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
246:01:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
221:21:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
67:21:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
500:Day-Old Dishwater Weak Keep:
451:Walnut production by country
319:met by Calliopejen1's work.
571:
272:Walnut production in Nepal
447:Fruit production in Nepal
236:. Looks much better now.
543:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
203:such essays, described
477:Walnut use in Nepal
467:
459:
388:Walnut#Production
377:
357:
332:
324:
307:
562:
545:
512:
461:
457:
326:
322:
317:Heymann standard
197:
196:
182:
134:
122:
104:
81:Nepalese walnuts
73:Nepalese walnuts
65:
34:
570:
569:
565:
564:
563:
561:
560:
559:
558:
552:deletion review
541:
508:
139:
130:
95:
79:
76:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
568:
566:
557:
556:
536:
535:
517:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
472:
471:
403:
402:
379:
378:
358:
337:
336:
309:
308:
287:
286:
265:
248:
200:
199:
136:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
567:
555:
553:
549:
544:
538:
537:
534:
530:
526:
521:
518:
516:
513:
511:
505:
501:
498:
497:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
470:
465:
460:
452:
448:
444:
443:Juglans regia
440:
436:
432:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
406:
405:
404:
401:
397:
393:
389:
384:
383:Wait a minute
381:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
359:
356:
352:
348:
344:
339:
338:
335:
330:
325:
318:
314:
311:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
289:
288:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:Juglans regia
206:
195:
191:
188:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
145:
142:
141:Find sources:
137:
133:
129:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
63:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
542:
539:
519:
509:
507:
499:
481:Clarityfiend
417:Clarityfiend
409:Calliopejen1
382:
312:
267:
255:Calliopejen1
250:
238:Clarityfiend
233:
227:
226:
201:
189:
183:
175:
168:
162:
156:
150:
140:
127:
59:
58:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
166:free images
548:talk page
510:Nha Trang
367:• Gene93k
347:• Gene93k
37:talk page
550:or in a
525:PianoDan
458:VVERTYVS
435:MelanieN
421:MelanieN
413:Qwertyus
392:MelanieN
323:VVERTYVS
297:MelanieN
276:MelanieN
213:MelanieN
125:View log
39:or in a
172:WP refs
160:scholar
98:protect
93:history
520:Delete
439:Walnut
228:Delete
144:Google
102:delete
231:info.
187:JSTOR
148:books
132:Stats
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
529:talk
485:talk
425:talk
396:talk
371:talk
351:talk
313:Keep
301:talk
280:talk
274:. --
268:Note
259:talk
251:Keep
242:talk
234:Keep
217:talk
205:here
180:FENS
154:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
464:hm?
449:or
445:or
441:or
329:hm?
194:TWL
123:– (
62:man
55:Mr.
52:.
531:)
487:)
427:)
415:,
411:,
398:)
373:)
365:.
353:)
345:.
315:,
303:)
295:.
282:)
261:)
244:)
219:)
174:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
60:Z-
527:(
483:(
466:)
462:(
456:Q
433:@
423:(
394:(
369:(
349:(
331:)
327:(
321:Q
299:(
278:(
257:(
240:(
215:(
198:)
190:·
184:·
176:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
146:(
138:(
135:)
128:·
121:)
83:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.