293:
this would make the content of wiki more comprehensive to me and others like me as a wiki user. As i agreed with you previously, been on another wiki page does not make something notable but for the reason just mentioned it seemed a natural extension of interest and practicality. The book seems to contain notable contributors and references and captures a specific point in time, in our history, i find that interesting and notable im sure many others do. As I understand it the
Imperial War Museum only requests items for their collections unlike the British Library who receive copies by default as you point out. Also for your own reference amazon don't stock the book but Waterstones do
214:
Previously deleted at afd. recreated seemingly to push a book - the editor who created it seems to have added the book to several articles under at least 3 similar user names. Bit part actor who compiled a book - which does not appear to have had much independent coverage, and Amazon.co.uk currently
256:
If this page is to be deleted is it not worth adding a page on the book rather than the author, for educational significance as the book is held in the british library and the imperial war museum collections for the purpose of free educational or study aid. The book as already been accepted by wiki
336:
I am aware of your qualifications for a notable book already. I think you need to read the whole discussion again and your own comments to see that I only answered the points you raised and corrected your information. At no point did I say a book being for sale made it notable in anyway. As for it
292:
If I am reading about a particular person on wiki and I see they have taken part in a particular book, usually I wish to know more about that book, without leaving the wiki site ie i click an internal link rather than hitting google in a new tab or the isbn link. obviously i assumed wrongly, that
301:
again I provide this for your information only as your own search didn't seem very extensive. To conclude I can only provide sources that are out there and why I personally looked to expand the content on wiki as it was something of interest to me and possibly others. Sharing the great pool of
337:
being available in the
British Library I already addressed that point. And I agree the page should be deleted based on what Wiki stipulate and my reasons why i thought it was of interest, which conflict with wiki. It's now becoming tiresome and a waste of time. Delete the page. --
276:
about the book? And as explained before your having adding it into another page has absolutely no significance in making it notable in any way. Being in a library is not notable - especially the
British library as that gets a copy of all books published in the UK.
183:
374:
82:
298:
136:
302:
information out there and all that. Obviously not this time round and I completely understand your reasons for doing so and your explanations given for deleting the page. --
394:
354:
177:
143:
77:
299:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Footsteps-War-Remembrance-ebook/dp/B00A44ZHQE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1365774311&sr=8-1&keywords=ni+bell+90
417:: Lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable independent sources for both author and book. Both fail all notability guidelines.
17:
257:
as notable in the bibliography of another wiki page and this might contribute to developing general information about the book. --
294:
443:
426:
406:
386:
366:
346:
330:
311:
286:
266:
250:
224:
61:
462:
40:
198:
109:
104:
165:
113:
321:
for what qualifies as a notable book - being available for sale or in a library does not meet those requirements.
422:
234:
96:
159:
458:
36:
418:
342:
338:
307:
303:
262:
258:
435:
273:
155:
439:
191:
100:
57:
318:
205:
402:
382:
362:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
457:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
92:
67:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
295:
http://www.waterstones.com/waterstonesweb/products/ni+bell/in+the+footsteps+of+war/8864001/
246:
238:
326:
282:
220:
171:
53:
434:, biggest claim is have two editions of a book released, which are self-published.
398:
378:
358:
297:
and have it available to order. And a kindle edition is available from amazon here
130:
242:
241:
has been found to contradict the 2011 AfD consensus that he is non-notable.
322:
278:
216:
451:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
233:
While it can be verified that the subject compiled a book for
375:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
52:. Also temporarily salted due to repeated re-creation. —
126:
122:
118:
190:
204:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
465:). No further edits should be made to this page.
83:Articles for deletion/Ni Bell (2nd nomination)
8:
395:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
393:Note: This debate has been included in the
373:Note: This debate has been included in the
355:list of England-related deletion discussions
353:Note: This debate has been included in the
392:
372:
352:
75:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:
24:
1:
78:Articles for deletion/Ni Bell
482:
444:22:20, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
427:07:04, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
407:15:26, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
387:15:26, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
367:15:26, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
347:20:58, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
331:20:22, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
312:14:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
287:12:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
267:08:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
251:07:06, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
225:18:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
62:02:22, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
454:Please do not modify it.
235:The Royal British Legion
32:Please do not modify it.
215:lists as unavailable.
73:AfDs for this article:
48:The result was
409:
389:
369:
473:
456:
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
34:
481:
480:
476:
475:
474:
472:
471:
470:
469:
463:deletion review
452:
419:Dominus Vobisdu
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
479:
477:
468:
467:
447:
446:
429:
411:
410:
390:
370:
334:
333:
290:
289:
254:
253:
212:
211:
148:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
478:
466:
464:
460:
455:
449:
448:
445:
441:
437:
433:
430:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
391:
388:
384:
380:
376:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
351:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
315:
314:
313:
309:
305:
300:
296:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:Why? What is
271:
270:
269:
268:
264:
260:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
453:
450:
431:
414:
335:
291:
255:
230:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
317:Please see
178:free images
339:Will peace
304:Will peace
274:WP:notable
259:Will peace
459:talk page
436:SalHamton
399:• Gene93k
379:• Gene93k
359:• Gene93k
37:talk page
461:or in a
319:WP:NBOOK
239:evidence
137:View log
54:Darkwind
39:or in a
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
93:Ni Bell
68:Ni Bell
432:Delete
415:Delete
231:Delete
156:Google
114:delete
50:delete
243:AllyD
237:, no
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
440:talk
423:talk
403:talk
383:talk
363:talk
343:talk
327:talk
308:talk
283:talk
263:talk
247:talk
221:talk
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
323:noq
279:noq
217:noq
206:TWL
135:– (
442:)
425:)
405:)
397:.
385:)
377:.
365:)
357:.
345:)
329:)
310:)
285:)
265:)
249:)
223:)
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
438:(
421:(
401:(
381:(
361:(
341:(
325:(
306:(
281:(
261:(
245:(
219:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.