388:(which despite a Census Bureau definition is widely used in ways that differ from that definition, as the page points out). I don't see that as a problem though. Precise definitions are the exception rather than the rule in regional geography. The page can describe differing definitions. Also, I can't believe there's a lack of sources that don't just mention the region in passing. As Arxiloxos pointed out there are hundreds of sources on Google Books alone, many of which are not previewable (eg,
335:; the consensus there was that such definitional uncertainties are inevitable, but this is not a reason to delete an article about a well-recognized region. The same is true here. As already mentioned in the article, this region is recognized by the National Weather Service
341:
339:
249:
may not encompass the
Niagara Frontier in its entirety, depending on how each region is defined. Without a useful or obvious redirect target, it's better to just delete the article and let the encyclopedia's search function take over.
226:
the
Niagara Frontier itself normally fail to define the area in a way that is useful to us. And even if there are sources that define the area adequately, it's likely that such sources would each define the region
177:
332:
344:
308:
338:. For a number of years, one of New York State's regional planning boards was the Niagara Frontier Planning Board, initially established in 1925 for Erie and Niagara Counties.
130:
171:
268:
253:
I don't enjoy recommending this course of action, but I think it's the only one available given the dearth of clear definition and reliable sources for that definition.
52:. Notability is the key to inclusion, not anything else like how well-defined it is. If different sources conflict, then it is our duty to present all major viewpoints.
288:
245:'But!' you say. 'This is a likely search term!' Indeed it is. But where would we redirect it to? We have no sources that clearly define the area. Even
208:
First, let me make clear that the
Niagara Frontier is a notable topic. The problem is that at this time an article is not sustainable or maintainable.
137:
376:. It's normal for regions like this to not have precise definitions. If the lack of a standard definition is a problem, it is a problem for pages like
360:
None of the evidence you've presented contradicts anything I said. We've got a crapton of references without any clear and consensus definition.
462:
239:
103:
98:
66:
107:
17:
90:
242:
does not mention it, probably because it's so poorly defined. Some sources indicate the frontier extends as far as Toledo, Ohio!
222:
I have searched for additional sources, and the vast majority merely mention the region in passing. Even those sources that are
192:
159:
405:
That's an impossibly high bar to have passed. I haven't found any sources that can reasonably claim to be about the region
508:
40:
153:
457:
385:
61:
489:
468:
426:
413:
400:
364:
355:
320:
300:
280:
260:
72:
149:
504:
199:
94:
36:
481:
485:
452:
449:
351:
185:
56:
53:
438:
331:. A few months ago, a similar concern about the uncertain boundaries of a region was raised in
234:
The article appears to be widely linked, but in fact that's just an artifact of its presence in
381:
316:
296:
276:
235:
165:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
503:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
246:
86:
78:
396:
347:
480:
per nominator's first sentence: "clear that the
Niagara Frontier is a notable topic".
423:
410:
361:
257:
312:
292:
272:
124:
389:
377:
441:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
336:
392:
343:. GBooks shows many hundreds of books with "Niagara Frontier" in the title.
231:. That makes it veritably impossible to write an article about it.
391:). I can't believe these have all been checked and found wanting.
497:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
333:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/South
Carolina Lowcountry
219:. The only source listed in the article is now a dead link.
120:
116:
112:
184:
448:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
198:
309:list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
511:). No further edits should be made to this page.
422:How can we define the scope of this article?
418:And furthermore, without a clear definition,
269:list of New York-related deletion discussions
240:List of regions of the United States#New York
8:
307:Note: This debate has been included in the
287:Note: This debate has been included in the
267:Note: This debate has been included in the
306:
286:
266:
409:region; if you have, please share them.
289:list of Ohio-related deletion discussions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
211:The statements in this article are
24:
1:
420:What is this article about?
528:
490:10:49, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
469:03:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
427:02:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
414:02:04, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
401:08:42, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
365:17:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
356:16:15, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
321:13:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
301:13:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
281:13:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
261:12:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
73:19:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
500:Please do not modify it.
386:Midwestern United States
32:Please do not modify it.
217:completely uncited
213:wholly unsupported
48:The result was
471:
382:Pacific Northwest
323:
303:
283:
236:Template:New York
519:
502:
465:
460:
455:
447:
443:
247:Western New York
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
87:Niagara Frontier
79:Niagara Frontier
69:
64:
59:
34:
527:
526:
522:
521:
520:
518:
517:
516:
515:
509:deletion review
498:
463:
458:
453:
436:
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
525:
523:
514:
513:
493:
492:
474:
473:
472:
445:
444:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
416:
370:
369:
368:
367:
325:
324:
304:
284:
206:
205:
142:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
524:
512:
510:
506:
501:
495:
494:
491:
487:
483:
479:
476:
475:
470:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
442:
440:
435:
434:
428:
425:
421:
417:
415:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
398:
394:
390:
387:
383:
379:
375:
372:
371:
366:
363:
359:
358:
357:
353:
349:
345:
342:
340:
337:
334:
330:
327:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
302:
298:
294:
290:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
265:
264:
263:
262:
259:
254:
251:
248:
243:
241:
237:
232:
230:
225:
220:
218:
214:
209:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
499:
496:
477:
437:
419:
406:
373:
328:
255:
252:
244:
233:
228:
223:
221:
216:
212:
210:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
384:, and even
229:differently
172:free images
378:Appalachia
505:talk page
482:Dricherby
348:Arxiloxos
313:• Gene93k
293:• Gene93k
273:• Gene93k
37:talk page
507:or in a
439:Relisted
131:View log
39:or in a
450:King of
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
424:Powers
411:Powers
362:Powers
258:Powers
150:Google
108:delete
224:about
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
486:talk
478:Keep
397:talk
393:Pfly
374:Keep
352:talk
329:Keep
317:talk
297:talk
277:talk
215:and
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
50:keep
407:qua
256:--
238:.
200:TWL
129:– (
488:)
467:♠
399:)
380:,
354:)
346:--
319:)
311:.
299:)
291:.
279:)
271:.
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:♠
484:(
464:♣
459:♦
454:♥
395:(
350:(
315:(
295:(
275:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.