212:
reader has to go to a search engine and try to determine who this person is anyway? This article has no citations, no external links, no
Wikilinks, very little information, and although I'm not a big fan of deletion of poorly written articles with no reason other than the way they are written, this article makes no assertion of notability, it serves no purpose to anybody, is promotional, makes Knowledge look like it is written by third graders (no offense to any little kids out there), and seems to fall under multiple
211:
The article very vague and does not clearly indentify who this "Nick King" is. Nick is a very common name, and so is King. This article isn't encyclopedic at all; it serves no purpose other than to promote the person to people who have heard of him. What is the point of a
Knowledge article if a
76:
136:
172:
71:
182:
157:
17:
235:
222:
203:
186:
161:
55:
103:
98:
107:
90:
250:
36:
249:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
231:
217:
197:
49:
196:
anyway, I can't imagine any other result. This is pretty blatant and probably a copyvio to boot.
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
150:
but the nomination was removed by an anonymous editor who has continued to update the page.
176:
151:
143:
94:
213:
147:
124:
168:
86:
61:
243:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
131:
120:
116:
112:
171:seems to be completely unrelated to the subject of
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
253:). No further edits should be made to this page.
77:Articles for deletion/Nick King (2nd nomination)
8:
146:. Article was nominated for speedy under
69:
7:
68:
173:WP:Articles for deletion/Nick King
24:
72:Articles for deletion/Nick King
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
236:19:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
223:18:32, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
204:17:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
187:17:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
162:17:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
56:19:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
270:
246:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
67:AfDs for this article:
48:Non-admin closure.
202:and his otters •
54:and his otters •
44:The result was
209:Delete or Rewrite
261:
248:
232:Ten Pound Hammer
220:
200:
199:Ten Pound Hammer
179:
154:
134:
128:
110:
52:
51:Ten Pound Hammer
34:
269:
268:
264:
263:
262:
260:
259:
258:
257:
251:deletion review
244:
218:
198:
185:
177:
167:Note that this
160:
152:
130:
101:
85:
82:
65:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
267:
265:
256:
255:
239:
238:
225:
206:
190:
189:
181:
156:
141:
140:
81:
80:
79:
74:
66:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
266:
254:
252:
247:
241:
240:
237:
233:
229:
226:
224:
221:
215:
210:
207:
205:
201:
195:
192:
191:
188:
184:
180:
174:
170:
166:
165:
164:
163:
159:
155:
149:
145:
138:
133:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
78:
75:
73:
70:
63:
60:
58:
57:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
245:
242:
227:
214:CSD criteria
208:
193:
142:
45:
43:
31:
28:
219:PCHS-NJROTC
228:Speedy G11
178:WikiDan61
169:Nick King
153:WikiDan61
87:Nick King
62:Nick King
183:ReadMe!!
158:ReadMe!!
137:View log
104:protect
99:history
132:delete
108:delete
135:) – (
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
230:per
144:Spam
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
234:.
194:G11
148:G11
46:G11
216:.
175:.
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
139:)
129:(
127:)
89:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.