Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Nick Redfern - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

154: 417: 392:. There are about 50 more sources with a similar depth of coverage available but I don't have time to rewrite the whole thing to incorporate them all right now. If nothing else, he meets 115: 213: 148: 239: 384:- Very well known, not only in his field but also in the 'mainstream media'. I've added extra sources and facts to establish notability. All the sources meet 413: 409: 299:("History and High-Strangeness Speculation". May/June 2010. Vol 34, Issue 3. pg. 59). On top of that, there was some talk about adapting 17: 88: 83: 92: 169: 431: 75: 136: 450: 36: 198: 449:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
427: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
194: 130: 126: 435: 400: 373: 369: 345: 341: 318: 272: 254: 228: 202: 57: 53: 176: 396:
as many of his books have been best-sellers which have garnered lots of mainstream press coverage.
162: 393: 356: 328: 190: 314: 285: 250: 224: 79: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
365: 337: 49: 186: 288: 142: 422:
Quality of his work aside, the publishing deals + the movie deals = notability. Definite
385: 280:
The nom's statement is not entirely true. At least one of his books was reviewed by the
263:
Writer with no notices to speak of. Not notable even if all claims in article are true.
304: 268: 389: 306: 246: 220: 71: 63: 109: 408:. Given the extra sources, this now seems to meet the guidelines for inclusion. 397: 359:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
331:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
264: 443:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105: 101: 97: 193:
community, thus we cannot write an article about him.
161: 364:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 336:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 175: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 453:). No further edits should be made to this page. 293:Contactees: A History of Alien-Human Interaction 214:list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions 8: 240:list of People-related deletion discussions 234: 208: 238:: This debate has been included in the 212:: This debate has been included in the 287:, and according to a ProQuest search, 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 410:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 189:. Not any notice outside of the 1: 319:05:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC) 273:21:01, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 255:20:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 229:20:35, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 203:16:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC) 436:18:57, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 418:15:33, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 401:15:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC) 58:01:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC) 374:14:59, 8 January 2011 (UTC) 346:01:22, 1 January 2011 (UTC) 470: 301:Three Men Seeking Monsters 446:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 388:and can be used for 297:Skeptical Inquirer 44:The result was 376: 348: 257: 243: 231: 217: 461: 448: 363: 361: 335: 333: 310: 244: 218: 180: 179: 165: 113: 95: 34: 469: 468: 464: 463: 462: 460: 459: 458: 457: 451:deletion review 444: 354: 326: 308: 289:Robert Sheaffer 122: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 467: 465: 456: 455: 439: 438: 420: 403: 378: 377: 362: 351: 350: 349: 334: 323: 322: 321: 303:into a movie: 282:New York Times 275: 258: 232: 185:Seems to fail 183: 182: 119: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 466: 454: 452: 447: 441: 440: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 419: 415: 411: 407: 404: 402: 399: 395: 391: 387: 383: 380: 379: 375: 371: 367: 360: 358: 353: 352: 347: 343: 339: 332: 330: 325: 324: 320: 317: 316: 312: 305: 302: 298: 294: 290: 286: 283: 279: 276: 274: 270: 266: 262: 259: 256: 252: 248: 241: 237: 233: 230: 226: 222: 215: 211: 207: 206: 205: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 178: 174: 171: 168: 164: 160: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 132: 128: 125: 124:Find sources: 120: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 445: 442: 423: 405: 381: 355: 327: 313: 300: 296: 292: 281: 278:Weakish keep 277: 260: 235: 209: 184: 172: 166: 158: 151: 145: 139: 133: 123: 72:Nick Redfern 64:Nick Redfern 45: 43: 31: 28: 382:Strong Keep 366:Ron Ritzman 338:Ron Ritzman 149:free images 50:Ron Ritzman 394:WP:AUTHOR 291:reviewed 247:• Gene93k 221:• Gene93k 191:WP:FRINGE 357:Relisted 329:Relisted 116:View log 155:WP refs 143:scholar 89:protect 84:history 261:Delete 187:WP:BIO 127:Google 93:delete 398:Panyd 386:WP:RS 307:Zagal 170:JSTOR 131:books 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 432:talk 424:keep 414:talk 406:Keep 390:WP:V 370:talk 342:talk 295:for 269:talk 265:EEng 251:talk 236:Note 225:talk 210:Note 199:talk 163:FENS 137:news 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 46:keep 315:^^^ 245:-- 219:-- 195:jps 177:TWL 114:– ( 434:) 428:DS 426:. 416:) 372:) 344:) 311:jo 284:: 271:) 253:) 242:. 227:) 216:. 201:) 157:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 48:. 430:( 412:( 368:( 340:( 309:e 267:( 249:( 223:( 197:( 181:) 173:· 167:· 159:· 152:· 146:· 140:· 134:· 129:( 121:( 118:) 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Ron Ritzman
talk
01:04, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Nick Redfern
Nick Redfern
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:BIO
WP:FRINGE
jps
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.