129:
series and the other are connected by the characters of X in book A and Y in book B, which are aunt and niece" or something similar) would be more than sufficient. The actual family tree, with all dates, names, relationships, ... has no relevance to this connection of the two series, which is the only part worth mentioning here. IF you prefer abbreviations to support a nomination: this page fails
163:, I love genealogy tables myself), but it also says "Please note that this Family Tree is the personal interpretation of Nancy Wright and others in the absence of an authorized version from Dorothy Dunnett and her publishers. While I have endeavored to make it accurate it may contain errors." This sounds like
128:
Contested prod. Deprodder considered my prod reason a suggestion to merge the contents, which it wasn't. To repeat: this fictional timeline is a form of excessive detail, a plot part that is not needed to understand either of the book series it is about. A short sentence in both articles ("This
88:
83:
92:
75:
232:
215:
195:
171:
146:
57:
121:
79:
71:
63:
155:
I haven't read the books and thus don't know in how the family tree is important / really not important at all (I read the nom).
17:
164:
247:
191:
36:
246:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
53:
223:- no real evidence of notability, no references outside of that "universe", and only one cite possible.
187:
160:
211:
228:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
156:
207:
142:
130:
168:
134:
224:
109:
181:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
138:
206:
this article is comprised entirely of in-universe information. ~
240:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
72:
Nicholas de Fleury and
Francis Crawford of Lymond - Family Tree
64:
Nicholas de Fleury and
Francis Crawford of Lymond - Family Tree
116:
105:
101:
97:
186:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
159:
seems to imply a general interest in such a table (
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
250:). No further edits should be made to this page.
167:, and we shouldn't have that on wikipedia. –
8:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
233:00:15, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
58:16:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
216:19:24, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
196:08:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
172:11:22, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
147:14:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
267:
188:--Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran
243:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
165:WP:Original research
44:The result was
198:
258:
245:
185:
183:
119:
113:
95:
34:
266:
265:
261:
260:
259:
257:
256:
255:
254:
248:deletion review
241:
179:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
264:
262:
253:
252:
236:
235:
218:
200:
199:
184:
176:
175:
174:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
263:
251:
249:
244:
238:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
219:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
201:
197:
193:
189:
182:
178:
177:
173:
170:
166:
162:
161:WP:Notability
158:
154:
151:
150:
149:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
242:
239:
220:
203:
180:
152:
127:
50:TexasAndroid
45:
43:
31:
28:
135:WP:NOT#PLOT
208:Ningauble
169:sgeureka
122:View log
225:Bearian
153:Comment
131:WP:NOTE
89:protect
84:history
221:Delete
204:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
46:Delete
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
229:talk
212:talk
192:talk
157:This
143:talk
139:Fram
133:and
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
231:)
214:)
194:)
145:)
137:.
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
227:(
210:(
190:(
141:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.