189:
They don't need any sources at all as long there is some assertion of notability (but I think what you said is a really neat idea). This article was tagged db-A7 three minutes after it was created. The speedy was declined as there are lots of assertions, but, as far as I can tell, none of them are
130:
I can't find any secondary sources for this person. Her name pops up in things like
General Motors press releases as being a contact, but I am unable to find any sources that would aid her in passing
154:
123:
245:
90:
85:
17:
94:
279:
77:
302:
36:
216:
175:
I thought BLPs required at least one secondary source otherwise they are speedied, or have I picked that up wrong?
261:
232:
301:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
287:
266:
236:
199:
184:
169:
143:
59:
195:
165:
139:
81:
254:
228:
73:
65:
180:
191:
161:
135:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
249:
131:
275:
220:
176:
55:
224:
111:
217:
http://www.therhodesglobalgroup.com/The_Rhodes_Global_Group/Nichole_Rhodes__.html
274:. Per Sixtysixsatr--I can't find any independent, secondary sources either.
50:
295:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
118:
107:
103:
99:
190:
significant enough to generate secondary commentary.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
305:). No further edits should be made to this page.
155:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
215:section along with the photo is copied from
211:, Copyright violation, most of text of the
149:
227:the claims of notability in the article.
153:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
219:Not-notable, can not find any
1:
248:assertions, thus violating
322:
288:16:44, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
267:23:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
237:01:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
200:01:40, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
185:00:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
170:23:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
144:21:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
60:06:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
298:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
244:as copyvio and having
44:The result was
283:
172:
158:
313:
300:
281:
257:
221:reliable sources
159:
121:
115:
97:
34:
321:
320:
316:
315:
314:
312:
311:
310:
309:
303:deletion review
296:
286:
255:
229:A new name 2008
117:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
319:
317:
308:
307:
291:
290:
278:
269:
239:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
128:
127:
74:Nichole Rhodes
68:
66:Nichole Rhodes
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
318:
306:
304:
299:
293:
292:
289:
285:
284:
277:
273:
270:
268:
265:
264:
263:
259:
258:
251:
247:
243:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
201:
197:
193:
188:
187:
186:
182:
178:
174:
173:
171:
167:
163:
156:
152:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
133:
125:
120:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
297:
294:
280:
271:
262:
260:
253:
241:
212:
208:
192:Sixtysixstar
162:TexasAndroid
150:
136:Sixtysixstar
129:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
246:unsourcable
276:Yilloslime
177:Quantpole
256:Schmidt,
124:View log
91:protect
86:history
272:Delete
250:WP:BLP
242:Delete
225:verify
213:Career
209:Delete
132:WP:BIO
119:delete
95:delete
46:delete
122:) – (
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
233:talk
196:talk
181:talk
166:talk
151:Note
140:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
252:.
223:to
160:--
235:)
198:)
183:)
168:)
157:.
142:)
134:.
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
48:.
282:C
231:(
194:(
179:(
164:(
138:(
126:)
116:(
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.