381:
per nom. Someone who lived to 126 during any era can be expected to have received substantial coverage. That this coverage isn't available indicates that either a) this is a hoax or b) this person isn't notable. The two keep votes do no appear to be based in any policy given the problems with the
199:
I have searched for more sources, but all I have been able to find is a bunch of stuff about different people named
Nicolas Savin, and some passing mentions that all seem to treat the Voyensky account as gospel. I believe these sources, to say nothing of the Voyensky account, fail our reliability
195:
This article about a man who supposedly lived to 126 is sourceable only to a single unreliable primary source. Of the four references currently in the article, the first does not mention the subject, the second is a link to a bunch of forum posts, and the third and fourth are actually the same: a
200:
requirements because they all accept the astonishing claim of Savin's extreme old age without question. This very dubious article should be deleted because it is not sufficiently sourceable to reliable, secondary sources.
488:.(reprinted from a major magazine of the times, reinforcing that it had significant coverage). That pretty much dismisses the possibility of a hoax, or people's guesses whether there would be significant coverage.
295:. Being known as the "last survivor of the French Revolutionary Wars of 1792-1802 and the last French officer of the Napoleonic Wars", even if not substantiated, is most certainly notable as far as I'm concerned. --
164:
125:
246:
158:
399:
I still think that this is a hoax, but this seems to be a hoax from the 1800s and is probably notable. The extraordinary lifespan isn't at all credible for this era.
269:
223:
486:
17:
98:
93:
356:- I'm not entirely convinced but there seems to be enough references now to make an argument to delete on the basis of a lack of
102:
453:. He does not appear to even be mentioned in the first reference, and the others are a blog which does not appear to satisfy
85:
179:
49:
146:
550:
36:
532:
549:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
140:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
535:
499:
470:
437:
408:
391:
369:
365:
348:
344:
321:
304:
284:
261:
238:
215:
136:
67:
433:
58:
525:
300:
186:
48:. Nominator's concerns about sourcing appeared have been addressed per improvements in the article. (
172:
418:
317:
89:
361:
340:
280:
257:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
466:
429:
404:
387:
196:
translation of an account of a conversation a
Russian writer, Voyensky, had with Mr. Savin.
53:
520:
458:
335:
152:
62:
296:
523:. Historical notability IS notability, and exactly what this encyclopedia is all about.
357:
331:
208:
454:
450:
495:
313:
81:
73:
511:
into a decently sourced and encyclopedic article to serve our readers. Improvements
276:
253:
230:
312:. I agree with Necrothesp. Any last survivor of a war belongs on Knowledge (XXG).
119:
462:
400:
383:
483:
Nicolas Savin, dernier vétéran de la grande armée: sa vie -sa mort, 1768-1894
421:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
201:
490:
485:
for confirmation of what the books is about, see the WorldCat link,
507:
with appreciation of the improvements since nomination, turning a
543:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
457:. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, so also fails
508:
115:
111:
107:
171:
428:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
185:
330:- subject seems to lack "significant coverage" in
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
553:). No further edits should be made to this page.
519:show this topic as being NOT a hoax, and indeed
479:A number of references have since been added.
247:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
268:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
222:Note: This debate has been included in the
270:list of People-related deletion discussions
224:list of France-related deletion discussions
267:
244:
221:
521:covered in multiple independent sources
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
334:and is therefore not notable under
24:
481:The current first reference is
1:
536:18:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
500:16:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
471:20:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
438:01:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
409:11:47, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
392:10:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
370:14:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
349:09:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
322:15:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
68:07:57, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
570:
305:17:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
285:01:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
262:01:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
239:01:56, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
216:07:48, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
546:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
517:delete !vote above
44:The result was
440:
287:
273:
264:
250:
241:
227:
66:
50:non-admin closure
561:
548:
528:
427:
423:
332:reliable sources
274:
251:
228:
206:
190:
189:
175:
123:
105:
60:
34:
569:
568:
564:
563:
562:
560:
559:
558:
557:
551:deletion review
544:
526:
416:
212:
202:
132:
96:
80:
77:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
567:
565:
556:
555:
539:
538:
502:
473:
443:
442:
441:
425:
424:
413:
412:
411:
394:
374:
373:
372:
324:
307:
289:
288:
265:
242:
210:
193:
192:
129:
76:
71:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
566:
554:
552:
547:
541:
540:
537:
534:
533:
530:
529:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
501:
497:
493:
492:
487:
484:
480:
477:
474:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:verifiability
448:
445:
444:
439:
435:
431:
426:
422:
420:
415:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
395:
393:
389:
385:
380:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
351:
350:
346:
342:
339:
337:
333:
329:
325:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
271:
266:
263:
259:
255:
248:
243:
240:
236:
232:
225:
220:
219:
218:
217:
214:
213:
207:
205:
197:
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
82:Nicolas Savin
79:
78:
75:
74:Nicolas Savin
72:
70:
69:
64:
61:(note: not a
59:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
545:
542:
531:
524:
516:
512:
504:
489:
482:
478:
475:
446:
417:
396:
377:
376:
362:Anotherclown
353:
341:Anotherclown
327:
326:
309:
292:
209:
203:
198:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
55:I, Jethrobot
54:
45:
43:
31:
28:
505:Strong Keep
430:Ron Ritzman
360:untenable.
159:free images
297:Necrothesp
515:the last
397:Weak keep
382:sources.
354:Weak keep
277:• Gene93k
254:• Gene93k
231:• Gene93k
527:Schmidt,
419:Relisted
314:1779Days
126:View log
165:WP refs
153:scholar
99:protect
94:history
463:Edison
459:WP:BIO
449:Fails
447:Delete
401:Nick-D
384:Nick-D
378:Delete
336:WP:GNG
328:Delete
137:Google
103:delete
513:since
496:talk
358:WP:RS
180:JSTOR
141:books
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
509:stub
476:Keep
467:talk
455:WP:V
434:talk
405:talk
388:talk
366:talk
345:talk
318:talk
310:Keep
301:talk
293:Keep
281:talk
258:talk
235:talk
204:Reyk
173:FENS
147:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
46:keep
491:DGG
211:YO!
187:TWL
124:– (
63:bot
498:)
469:)
461:.
436:)
407:)
390:)
368:)
347:)
320:)
303:)
283:)
275:—
272:.
260:)
252:—
249:.
237:)
229:—
226:.
167:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
65:!)
52:)
494:(
465:(
432:(
403:(
386:(
364:(
343:(
338:.
316:(
299:(
279:(
256:(
233:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
122:)
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.