590:
citation is about her husband, not
Nicolette. I did not intend to say AVN awards are paltry, but rather that these two, one of them a group award, are paltry. The hard-and-fast (yikes, pun NOT intended) 2 awards rule suggested by PORNBIO is one of its great weaknesses. And in biographies of living
625:
The GNG does not "trump" the SNGs. The SNGs do not "trump" the GNG. GNG is set for instances when SIGCOV is available. The SNGs are set for instances when SIGCOv is lacking. As both are parts of WP:N, they are intended to work together, and not to be set at odds. The standards of BLP require
553:, her stage name is similar to Nicolette Sheridan, Ok, but who cares? This is not the first nor the last case of a stage name chosen to remind, honor or exploit someone else's fame and Knowledge (XXG) wasn't created to judge stage names. --
492:
explains, the GNG is set in place to assist editors in determining notability when SIGCOV is present. The SNGs are set in place to assist in determing notability when SIGCOV is not present... just so long as assertions are
149:
438:
545:(criteria#1). AVN Awards are not "paltry" awards, are undoubtedly the most known and most relevant awards in adult industry. And the argument about unreliable sources is a typical
110:
501:, the are set to work in concert, and not in disharmony. Missing in GNG does not automatically equate to non-notable. Missing an SNG does automatically equate to non-notable. And
143:
669:
607:. This biography of a living person should be deleted or userfied, without prejudice to it's being recreated in Mainspace if it can be sourced to the standards of
363:
257:
but that's hardly notable, and no source is cited to suggest it is. Appearing in porn with a husband who has a colorful stage name is not notable either, per
360:
83:
78:
404:
87:
17:
70:
330:. Having looked over some of the sources offered in that AfD, and despite the closure, there is clearly not enough mainstream
164:
599:, so we're left only with AVN, and that's only good for the awards. So we're down to the awards. They're not enough to meet
131:
341:
284:
596:
724:
36:
418:
You are correct, it is not deprecated. please see my explanation, and amended "delete" rationale above. I apologize.
390:, especially since she's won two AVN Awards in different years. If PORNBIO is deprecated, why is it still listed at
279:(note working wikilink to criteria) deprecated? Can you provide a link to where that was discussed and/or enacted?
655:
526:
125:
723:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
489:
468:
337:
293:
You are correct, it was not deprecated. I was wrong, having taken for accurate assertions in the third AfD for
280:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
546:
709:
681:
658:
620:
562:
529:
472:
452:
427:
413:
375:
345:
310:
288:
270:
208:
121:
52:
630:
of assertions, not significant coverage of assertions. They are two different concepts, although related.
396:
74:
677:
616:
423:
306:
266:
204:
171:
223:
Please do not use the Porn WikiProject's now-deprecated
Pornbio criteria. Even if not deprecated, they
648:
519:
192:. The "article" is a single unsourced sentence, followed by a resume, sourced just about entirely to
66:
58:
693:
604:
595:, strong, multiple, reliable sources are imperitive. IMDB, IAFD and Sheridan's own web page are not
587:
583:
571:
550:
538:
514:
481:
387:
319:
276:
258:
238:
226:
189:
558:
464:
315:
294:
157:
697:
639:
542:
510:
485:
254:
185:
49:
448:
371:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
217:, as nominator. There's simply no there, there. The few awards don't confer notability, per
137:
707:
673:
612:
419:
302:
262:
200:
608:
600:
592:
579:
575:
391:
327:
326:
requirement for someone who otherwise lacks the media or scholarly coverage needed to meet
246:
242:
230:
218:
197:
181:
643:
193:
554:
631:
627:
498:
494:
237:
They are the start of the conversation, not the dispositive end of it. If a BLP meets
444:
367:
298:
104:
702:
517:
have new arguments about the notability (or not) of her various genre awards.
250:
488:. And to the nominator: the GNG does not trump other guidelines. As
692:
She has won two awards which are significant in her field. Passes
717:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
439:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
184:, notwithstanding paltry awards, similarity of name to
100:
96:
92:
156:
196:. Knowledge (XXG) is not a resume-hosting service.
170:
301:. I apologize. I've amended my entry accordingly.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
727:). No further edits should be made to this page.
463:- She passes PORNBIO with her two AVN awards.
235:If they were still in force, they would be the
188:, and porn appearances with her husband. See
8:
668:Note: This debate has been included in the
437:Note: This debate has been included in the
670:list of People-related deletion discussions
667:
436:
547:argument to avoid in deletion discussions
253:seems calculated to play off of the name
646:suitable for the topic being discussed.
505:PORNBIO is actually deprecated, we will
359:Note: This debate has been added to the
570:Our readings of the interplay between
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
549:. Finally, this is not a case of
578:differ. In this case, I believe
328:the general notability guideline
1:
710:20:54, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
659:06:53, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
336:coverage of Fox to meet GNG.
53:03:00, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
682:13:52, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
621:13:43, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
563:00:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
530:00:25, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
473:23:59, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
453:22:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
428:22:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
414:21:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
376:21:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
346:23:01, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
311:22:04, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
289:20:51, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
271:20:18, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
209:19:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
744:
322:should exist. It sets the
229:are not a way of evading
720:Please do not modify it.
497:. As both being part of
32:Please do not modify it.
361:WikiProject Pornography
297:and in the second for
603:even if they satisfy
597:WP:Reliable sources
490:Delicious carbuncle
338:Delicious carbuncle
281:Delicious carbuncle
255:Nicolette Sheridan
194:unreliable sources
186:Nicolette Sheridan
44:The result was
684:
455:
442:
364:list of deletions
735:
722:
705:
651:
642:... if found in
634:does not itself
522:
443:
410:
407:
402:
399:
378:
225:The criteria in
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
743:
742:
738:
737:
736:
734:
733:
732:
731:
725:deletion review
718:
701:
649:
520:
408:
405:
400:
397:
358:
318:is exactly why
117:
81:
67:Nicole Sheridan
65:
62:
59:Nicole Sheridan
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
741:
739:
730:
729:
713:
712:
686:
685:
664:
663:
662:
661:
565:
532:
475:
465:Morbidthoughts
457:
456:
433:
432:
431:
430:
380:
379:
355:
354:
353:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
249:controls. The
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
740:
728:
726:
721:
715:
714:
711:
708:
704:
699:
695:
691:
688:
687:
683:
679:
675:
671:
666:
665:
660:
657:
656:
653:
652:
645:
641:
637:
633:
632:Verifiability
629:
628:verifiability
624:
623:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
566:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
533:
531:
528:
527:
524:
523:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
491:
487:
483:
479:
476:
474:
470:
466:
462:
459:
458:
454:
450:
446:
440:
435:
434:
429:
425:
421:
417:
416:
415:
412:
411:
403:
393:
389:
385:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
357:
356:
347:
343:
339:
335:
334:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:Gabriella Fox
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:Gabriella Fox
292:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
719:
716:
689:
654:
647:
635:
591:people, per
567:
534:
525:
518:
506:
502:
480:per meeting
477:
460:
395:
383:
332:
331:
323:
299:Rachel Starr
234:
222:
214:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
674:David in DC
613:David in DC
535:Strong Keep
420:David in DC
333:significant
303:David in DC
263:David in DC
201:David in DC
144:free images
694:WP:PORNBIO
605:WP:PORNBIO
588:WP:INHERIT
584:WP:PORNBIO
572:WP:PORNBIO
551:WP:INHERIT
539:WP:PORNBIO
503:if or when
495:verifiable
482:WP:PORNBIO
388:WP:PORNBIO
320:WP:PORNBIO
277:WP:PORNBIO
259:WP:INHERIT
251:stage name
241:but fails
239:WP:PORNBIO
227:WP:PORNBIO
190:WP:INHERIT
698:WP:ANYBIO
555:Cavarrone
543:WP:ANYBIO
511:WP:ANYBIO
486:WP:ANYBIO
445:• Gene93k
275:When was
650:Schmidt,
521:Schmidt,
509:look to
111:View log
50:MuZemike
582:trumps
568:Comment
541:or per
368:Jarkeld
324:minimum
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
703:Dismas
640:SIGCOV
638:to be
609:WP:BLP
601:WP:GNG
593:WP:BLP
580:WP:GNG
576:WP:GNG
409:Silver
392:WP:BIO
247:WP:GNG
243:WP:GNG
231:WP:GNG
219:WP:GNG
215:Delete
198:WP:NOT
182:WP:GNG
180:Fails
122:Google
88:delete
586:. My
507:still
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
696:and
690:Keep
678:talk
636:have
617:talk
574:and
559:talk
537:per
515:then
513:and
499:WP:N
484:and
478:Keep
469:talk
461:Keep
449:talk
424:talk
398:City
386:per
384:Keep
372:talk
342:talk
307:talk
285:talk
267:talk
205:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
700:.
172:TWL
109:– (
48:. –
680:)
672:.
644:RS
619:)
611:.
561:)
471:)
451:)
441:.
426:)
394:?
374:)
366:.
344:)
309:)
287:)
269:)
261:.
245:,
233:.
221:.
207:)
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
706:|
676:(
615:(
557:(
467:(
447:(
422:(
406:f
401:O
370:(
340:(
305:(
283:(
265:(
203:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.