858:. I am concerned that all this fuss is about a guy who self published the only book that is alleged to be notable in the article. The closing admin for this AfD will need to take some trouble to review the evidence presented in the article to judge whether it should remain or go. With regard to your comment on the businessman I can't see 28 patents, only one, and I can't see anything that asserts notability or, yet, verifies it. All I see are empty citations which may or may not lead to articles which assert and/or verify Arora's notability. A valid solution is to userfy the article for now and allow its recreation if sufficient and substantial citations are added correctly.
813:
a great part, to journals (etc) and issue dates, but this is not, of itself, a useful citation. We need the article, the title, and ideally the author and the page number in the journal, for example, with paper media. As it stands at present I do not yet view the article as one which verifies any asserted notability. I also deny emphatically the validity of the
190:
compliant sources and citations. I have not yet succeeded. I've stripped out non RS sources, cited the guy's book (anyone can have an ISBN and a book, so that doesn't make him notable), and cited his patent (yup, anyone can have a patent, too). He's verifiable in the same way that I'm verifiable. But
977:
Thanks, Arbitration request has been filed in this matter. I feel as a good citizen it is my duty to give the arbitation committee an opportunity to preserve the integrity of
Wikepedia. Other than privacy matters that can not be discussed here, the nominator has removed the links that disprove his
812:
I have been looking at the citations in the article. I do not feel that many of the citations themselves are (yet) particularly useful and have made a comment to that effect on the article's talk page giving positive suggestions. There is a huge rash of apparent citations, but these simply refer, in
303:
Perhaps this is on purpose and this makes sense if
Wikepedia is overpopulated with editors and newcomers are not welcome. If this is the case, I suggest to those who run Wikepedia to post a clear sign, 'NEW EDITORS ARE NOT WELCOME' Such a clear language would help other newcomers not go through the
291:
The insipiration I got from RohnJones and
Icairns sustained me through the next upheavel which I am hoping was the result of mis-identity.My request for cooperation was unheeded. I was again surprised that when there is a considerable evidence that someone who has a vendetta against me in REAL LIFE
988:
and see for youself that the premise behind deletion that 'anyone can register a patent' is blatantly false. Patents are not registered, they are granted after a long complex process documented on the site. I also encourage all to use PAIR system on USPTO site to understand the long arduous process
923:
There's a large number of sources to publications which, on their own merits, are verifiable and can confer notability. That said, no effort has been made to verify any of the sources, and I'm more than a little surprised that, given the sheer number of them, that Google
Scholar and all their other
700:
United States Patent and
Trademark Office granted major patent claims to him out of Washington DC and not out of Indianapolis. It appears that United states Patent and Trademark office has no presence in the city of Indianapolis. The 28 patent claims are enforceable across the USA, not only in the
686:
He founded two of the fastest companies in the USA not just
Indiana. His company,Action Sytems Inc was named 29th fastest growing company in the United states, not just state of Indiana or city of Indianapolis. This company did business with over 50 nuclear plants across the globe. I just checked
225:
The article meets all the requirements of
Wikepedia regarding Biography of Living Persons. I request the Administrator to read the completely rewritten article and make a decision based on Wikepedia guidelines on notability and not based on consensus.If this course is not possible, please inform me
926:
Additionally, as an aside, I would counsel the article author to tone down the rhetoric in this discussion, as well as the sheer volume of postings. None of this is helping your cause. Indeed, I'm generally inclined to consider any situation in which an enormous amount of justification regarding
713:
He has been called foremost expert in radiation monitoring in power plants by a magazine of international scope. Since there are no nuclear plants in
Indianapolis or the state of Indiana, this activity is obviously carried out soewhere else. As a matter of fact, sources I have gathered from the
537:
thank you for alerting the creator to the need to refrain from unpleasant behaviour. A less robust person than I am might have been intimidated, so such shots across the bows by an independent editor are important. I would like to make sure that this does not influence anyone either to !vote to
287:
Was I in for a big surprise? Within minutes of publishing a straigtforward article my head was bitten off. Certainly I was ignorant about
Wikepedia policies, but it would been nice if experienced Wikepedians offered to help instead of intimidating me. Then I found extremely helpful people in
278:
I started out knowing very little about Nigam Arora. After reading Nigam Arora's book on Theory ZYX, I turned to
Knowledge (XXG) to find more about him. There was nothing. When a colleague of mine asked me if I knew more about Nigam Arora, I did some research and wrote a brief aricle on
836:
Fails notability as an author; can't evaluate him as a business person. But as an author, his only book is self-published, and its only reviews are at the Amazon and B&N websites. This is not enough to establish notability as an author and casts doubt on his notability in general.
1039:
My parting suggestion is to please be informed before commenting and also look up the paper media, for example look at INC. magazines Dec 1987. Dec 1988 and Dec 1989 issues to see rankings of Arora's companies. Please understand that GOOGLE COVERAGE BEFORE ABOUT 2002 IS VERY SPARSE.
717:
It is not believable that the city of Indianapolis has 369 municipalities if that is what a prior comment implies; Nigam Arora was the founder and CEO of the B2B exchange for 369 municipalities, at least 368 of these municipalities would have to be outside the city of Indianapolis.
980:
I have nothing to gain from this article, so I will not be posting here anymore. AS a side note, I have never claimed that this person was notable as an author. This person is notable because o his lifetime of inventions, product development and successfully commercializing of the
1043:
Wikipedians, it is a bigger question of integrity of Wikepedia . It is up to you to chose between supporting gaming the system for personal revenge or supporting the best interest of Wikepedia; to choose between following the published policies of Wikepedia such as the one on
1000:
I would also encorage all who bother to read the two guidelines to go to the history page of this article and see for yourself how the system has been gamed, the links that show the te premise behind deletion is false have been vandalized and how the process has been abused.
413:- only hits I could find anywhere were where his company was involved in a lawsuit - no GNews hits, etc. No reliable source cites. If the author would prefer, he could work up the article in his user space - that would be the simple solution. As is, he is not notable. (
258:
Can someone please guide me how to write about controversies? In the literature there are fans of Nigam Arora's inventions and there are detractors. I would like to take a balanced approach by equal space to those who do not like him and and those who praise his work.
1011:, an article I had just started. The article is nominated by the same person for deletion before I even had a chance to work on it. Same pattern on the part of this person as he did Nigam Arora article by nominating it for speedy deletion when I had just started on it.
191:
he is not notable in the same way that I am not notable. Because there is an editor actively seeking to improve the article I have chosen AfD instead of the Speedy route, even though it could so easily be speedied. But I want to play fair with the effort made so far.
754:
Subscription based sources do not show up in Google search. Older sources also do not show up in Google search. Some sources show up in Google , but the searcher will have to be dilligent to go throuh all the pages on Google not just the first few pages.
337:
This nomination has been made by a person who has not disclosed his real identity and there is evidence that this person is motivated by a personal vendetta. I am willing to present this evidence to the administrator if this person discloses his real
387:
to him. He has now attacked me on my talk page and here. I am no longer interacting with him. For the record, I have no idea who Nigam Arora is, nor am I the least bit interested. The article is one that fails to assert notability. It cites no
292:
may be a person on Wikepedia, there appears to be no good way to clear up the issue in a civil and amicable manner. The situation is further complicated because, again to my surprise,some people on Wikepedia do not use their real identity.
283:
I had always thought of Wikepedia as a collegial place where volunteers selflessly put in lots of effort to benefit others with information. Since over years, I have benefitted from Wikepedia I thought it was now my turn to contribute.
683:. Certainly two continents are bigger than the city of Indianapolis alone. Perhaps honestly there is some confusion between Indanapolis and India. India is a large country in the continent of Asia and Indianapolis is a city in USA.
761:
I am new to Wikepedia, but it seems strange that comments are made based solely on the first couple of pages of Google search. What happened to going to libraries, like I did for this article, and doing proper due dilligence?
645:
Insufficient coverage by independent reliable sources to establish notability. Most references found are mere mentions, without substance. He may be "hot stuff" in Indianapolis, but one local blurb is not significant coverage.
1062:
THanks to those who helped and apologies if I did anything wrong. I am a straight forward person and hate manipuation with a passion. Since I have nothing to gain by staying here to fight manipulation, I do not belong here.
253:
I plan to continue to add to Nigam Arora page as I get time and invite others to contribute to this page. I also intend to contribute the material I have found to other pages on Wikepedia and also will start new pages where
556:
is a new user who might not yet be familiar with Knowledge (XXG) policies (which is why I left a warning at his talk page rather than directly report him at AN/I). However, now that he has been informed about the
155:
459:
817:
directed at me in much of the rhetoric above. For the record I neither know nor care who Nigam Arora is, nor do I have any idea who the editor is who is making such impassioned allegations against me.
898:
In neither case does it suggest that the book or the author is notable. Anyone can pay to have a work published and anyone can have an ISBN. Come to that anyone can register a patent, or 28 patents
590:), but we don't generally allow court documents as sources. Other than that, there are just a couple articles in the Indiana business journal that don't say enough about him to use as sources. ā
854:
I was surprised to learn that LA Press Inc, the publisher of the book is self publishing, but the only links I can find to it or mentions of it are on Nigam Arora owned (or fan) websites. See
687:
and found there are no nuclear plants in th state of Indiana or city of Indianapolis. As a matter of fact there are only 104 operating commercial nuclear plants in the entire country of USA.
1032:
I came to Wikepedia to help better the Wikepedia, not to engage in GAMING the SYSTEM, not for warfare, not to be abused and certainly not to give this one particular person opportunities to
1036:. This person has been on Wikepedia for a while and is good at gaming the systems and bringing his buddies to back him. I have no reason to copy the behavior. My response is -- good bye.
927:
notability is required to be a situation in which notability probably doesn't exist. I don't make a final judgment based on that, but that is an impression that exists. Just a thought!
766:
What would be the point of Wikepedia if WIkepedia must be limited to first few pages of Google? In such a case Wikepedia would be redundant and there will be no point to its existence.
485:
110:
751:
Majority of the cited sources are major publications with large circulation and national or international scope. These are available in libraries. I found them in libraries.
392:. In its current state it should not be here. If he is that passionate about creating it then user space is the place for it until such time as the subject achieves notability.
959:
and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of useā
724:
Let us not become members of the FLAT EARTH SOCIETY. Just because someone does not accept that the earth is round does not mean Wikepedia should declare the earth flat
433:
924:
search libraries doesn't turn up more than a mention or two of this man. This is generally the case when the sources constitute "trivial coverage," in my experience.
149:
513:
concerns here since some coverage is related to the company lawsuit and as such is contentious in nature. I should note that the article's creator made an attempt
351:
In any case, I will improve the page over the next couple of weeks and I invite all volunteers to help to ensure this page meets all requirements of Wikepedia
701:
city of Indianapolis and enforceable under the Federal Law. A city or state has no jurisdiction over patents: major patents are not the matter of one city .
307:
On the other hand, if new editors are welcome, I suggest to those who run Wikepedia to craft strict policies so that new comers are not subjected to abuse.
586:. Google news search found some court opinions mentioning his name in the case KnowledgeAZ vs Jim Walter Resources (as far as I can tell, a lawsuit over a
115:
697:
United States Patent and Trademark Office is part of the Federal Government of the United States and not part of Indianapolis city government.
342:
It is unfortunate that this person has declined my invitation to work with me to improve the page and instead has insisted on the deletion route
315:
Should Wikepedia decide to go in this direction, I will be glad to help and invite those in power to let me know how best I can help Wikepedia.
1008:
215:
Most of the comments on this page are prior to rewriting of the page and addition of 34 cites, most of them of national or international scope
797:
770:
it seems to me the point of Wikepedia is to have well researched articles and not merely be a duplication of the first few pages of Google.
299:
It would appear to me that less robust newcomers would simply quit if they face what I faced on Wikepedia in writing my first article.
288:
RohnJones and Icairns; my heartful thanks to these two. Also my thanks to all those from whose work I have benefitted over the years.
538:
delete the article or to keep it because of that behaviour. All editors make mistakes, many turn out to be a considerable asset here.
17:
1004:
Please also see how this is the second attempt by this person to delete this article, see for yourself and make your own judgement
964:
956:
691:
His company Action Systems Technology was ranked 103rd fastest growing company in the United States, not in the state of Indiana.
1049:
997:
1052:, and voting on this page or other pages by being bamboozled by a master gamesman such as the case here regarding the patent.
83:
78:
355:
If this person changes his mind and is willing to cooperate in good faith to improve the page, I will be glad to work with him
677:. In addition there are several cites related to Indianapolis starting from 1987 and stretching over a long period of time.
87:
1023:
993:
970:
296:
for harsh words,in the event of mis-identification on my part. There is no way to confirm because of fictional identities.
170:
669:
Most of the comments appear to be prior to rewriting of the page and addition of 34 cites. Previosly there were no cites.
1022:
OF THE GUIDELINE HAVE BEEN MET, and an earlier comment on this page is gaming the system by falsely stating the policy.
781:
I apologize if I have offended anyone, but it seems to me Wikepedia is not well served when a comment is not informed.
495:
469:
443:
137:
70:
1093:
36:
313:
What would be wrong in holding hands of newcomers, teaching them and being gentle with them when they make mistakes?
1074:
793:
758:
Older sources also do not show up online. International sources, especially older ones are often not on Google.
732:
363:
323:
267:
233:
1092:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
595:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
131:
1030:
In any case Wikepedians, this is good bye for now. I will no longer be posting on this page or on Wikepedia.
492:
466:
440:
785:
1019:
707:, not just in one city. I have gathered lot of material on his inventions and there use across the world.
710:
Amazon.com , and Barnes and Noble are international organizations and not based in city of Indianapolis.
244:
In my work on this article so far I have accumulated a ton of additional material and additiona cites (
937:
631:
347:
I also recommend that the administrator contact Nigam Arora, the person who is the subject of this page.
127:
1078:
942:
907:
893:
867:
846:
826:
801:
736:
681:
Nigam Arora has verified record of notability across two continents over a period of at least 23 years
655:
635:
616:
599:
570:
547:
529:
500:
474:
448:
422:
401:
367:
327:
271:
237:
200:
52:
74:
1070:
789:
728:
553:
359:
319:
263:
229:
627:
591:
418:
177:
163:
558:
517:
903:
889:
863:
842:
822:
612:
587:
543:
397:
196:
66:
58:
384:
309:
Most new comers will make mistakes and will not be familiar with extensive policies of Wikepedia
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
334:
I am in the process of adding more citations and hope to do so over the next couple of weeks.
211:*In view of the latest improvements to this article, the request for deletion should be moot.
1034:
obssessively use Wikepedia to take revenge for what happened between him and me in real life
928:
651:
509:. Insufficient coverage by independent reliable sources to establish notability. Additional
955:
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at
855:
814:
607:, since the creator wants to improve the page over the next two weeks, and add references.
583:
510:
380:
566:
525:
248:) not only on Nigam Arora but also on power plants, change management, new systems, etc.
389:
187:
143:
694:
His companies did business internationally, not just in one state of the United States.
414:
379:
I am disappointed with this editor's personal attacks and lack of civility. I commend
221:
When majority of comments on this page were made, there were no cites in this article.
899:
885:
859:
838:
818:
608:
539:
393:
192:
721:
There is lot more I can add to this argument and will add if an appeal is needed.
673:
The comment about only a blurb in Indianapolis is strange and not based on facts.
104:
647:
301:
I almost quit, because I have nothing to gain from this article on Nigam Arora.
562:
521:
49:
714:
library show that Nigam Arora's activities have been international in scope.
1026:
provides a good example that parallels what is happening on this page.
1055:
Consensus is wonderful as long as it is informed and not manipulated.
778:
consensus. Once upon a time there was consensus that earth was flat.
768:
I am new to wikepedia, so I do not know what Wikepedians want? But
881:
516:
to make the nominator reveal their real identity, in violation of
1086:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
884:, where it sounds more like a print shop than a "publisher". --
965:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration
460:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
978:
point and replaced it with another link to prove his point.
1009:
Revision history of Radiation monitoring in power plants
514:
100:
96:
92:
957:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests#Gaming the System
162:
989:
of 7 years for the grant of the patent in question.
675:
29 of 34 cites are of national or international scope
986:
486:
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions
176:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1096:). No further edits should be made to this page.
880:The only "LA Press Inc." I could find online is
705:His inventions have been used all over the world
304:pain, abuse and intimidation I went through.
8:
434:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
480:
454:
428:
484:: This debate has been included in the
458:: This debate has been included in the
432:: This debate has been included in the
582:due to lack of evidence that he passes
1058:Debate is yours. I will not be here.
774:Consensus is wonderful, but it must be
213:The article is completely rewritten.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
626:lacks coverage in 3rd party sources
561:policy, I hope he will abide by it.
1050:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)
998:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)
24:
1024:Knowledge (XXG):Gaming the system
994:Knowledge (XXG):Gaming the system
971:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration guide
992:I also encourage all to review
1018:, judge for youself that ALL
1014:I also encourage all to visit
1:
1079:23:47, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
943:22:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
908:22:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
894:17:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
868:17:38, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
847:17:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
827:14:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
802:04:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
737:00:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
656:04:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
636:02:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
617:22:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
600:20:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
571:13:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
548:13:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
530:13:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
501:12:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
475:12:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
449:12:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
423:02:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
402:07:26, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
368:01:23, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
328:01:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
272:01:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
238:01:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
201:22:36, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
246:not presently in the article
1113:
226:the procedure for appeal.
985:I encourage all to go to
294:In any case, my apologies
53:01:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
1089:Please do not modify it.
186:I've been searching for
32:Please do not modify it.
552:Yes, I do realize that
1020:Essential parameters
1046:Template:Cite news
1016:Template:Cite news
1007:Please also visit
588:non-compete clause
44:The result was
805:
788:comment added by
503:
498:
489:
477:
472:
463:
451:
446:
437:
1104:
1091:
940:
935:
815:personal attacks
804:
782:
496:
490:
470:
464:
444:
438:
390:reliable sources
181:
180:
166:
118:
108:
90:
34:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1094:deletion review
1087:
1071:John williams 7
938:
929:
790:John williams 7
783:
729:John williams 7
554:John williams 7
360:John williams 7
320:John williams 7
264:John williams 7
230:John williams 7
123:
114:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1110:
1108:
1099:
1098:
1081:John Williams
1061:
975:
974:
968:
952:
951:
946:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
910:
873:
872:
871:
870:
830:
829:
744:
743:
739:John Williams
690:
666:
665:
659:
658:
639:
638:
620:
619:
602:
592:David Eppstein
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
504:
478:
452:
426:
407:
406:
405:
404:
370:John Williams
357:
356:
353:
348:
345:
339:
335:
330:John Williams
281:
280:
274:John Williams
250:
249:
240:John Williams
184:
183:
120:
116:AfD statistics
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1109:
1097:
1095:
1090:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1067:
1064:
1059:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1047:
1041:
1037:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1012:
1010:
1005:
1002:
999:
995:
990:
987:
983:
982:
972:
969:
966:
963:
962:
961:
960:
958:
950:
947:
945:
944:
941:
936:
934:
933:
922:
919:
918:
909:
905:
901:
900:Fiddle Faddle
897:
896:
895:
891:
887:
883:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
869:
865:
861:
860:Fiddle Faddle
857:
853:
850:
849:
848:
844:
840:
835:
832:
831:
828:
824:
820:
819:Fiddle Faddle
816:
811:
808:
807:
806:
803:
799:
795:
791:
787:
779:
777:
772:
771:
767:
763:
759:
756:
752:
749:
748:
742:
741:
740:
738:
734:
730:
725:
722:
719:
715:
711:
708:
706:
702:
698:
695:
692:
688:
684:
682:
678:
676:
671:
670:
664:
661:
660:
657:
653:
649:
644:
641:
640:
637:
633:
629:
625:
622:
621:
618:
614:
610:
606:
603:
601:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
578:
572:
568:
564:
560:
555:
551:
550:
549:
545:
541:
540:Fiddle Faddle
536:
533:
532:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
512:
508:
505:
502:
499:
494:
487:
483:
479:
476:
473:
468:
461:
457:
453:
450:
447:
442:
435:
431:
427:
424:
420:
416:
412:
409:
408:
403:
399:
395:
394:Fiddle Faddle
391:
386:
382:
378:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
369:
365:
361:
354:
352:
349:
346:
343:
340:
336:
333:
332:
331:
329:
325:
321:
316:
314:
310:
305:
302:
297:
295:
289:
285:
277:
276:
275:
273:
269:
265:
260:
256:
255:
247:
243:
242:
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
218:
216:
212:
208:
207:
203:
202:
198:
194:
193:Fiddle Faddle
189:
179:
175:
172:
169:
165:
161:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
125:Find sources:
121:
117:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1088:
1085:
1068:
1065:
1060:
1057:
1054:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1033:
1029:
1028:
1015:
1013:
1006:
1003:
991:
984:
979:
976:
954:
953:
948:
931:
930:
925:
920:
851:
833:
809:
780:
775:
773:
769:
765:
764:
760:
757:
753:
750:
746:
745:
726:
723:
720:
716:
712:
709:
704:
703:
699:
696:
693:
689:
685:
680:
679:
674:
672:
668:
667:
662:
642:
623:
604:
579:
534:
506:
481:
455:
429:
410:
376:
358:
350:
341:
317:
312:
308:
306:
300:
298:
293:
290:
286:
282:
261:
257:
254:appropriate.
252:
251:
245:
228:
224:
220:
219:
214:
210:
209:
205:
204:
185:
173:
167:
159:
152:
146:
140:
134:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
1066:Good Bye,
1048:as well as
981:inventions.
921:Weak Delete
784:āPreceding
150:free images
67:Nigam Arora
59:Nigam Arora
279:Wikepedia.
856:this link
559:WP:OUTING
518:WP:OUTING
415:GregJackP
338:identity.
932:É ĒɳĢ©ĻĪµĪÉ”
886:MelanieN
839:MelanieN
798:contribs
786:unsigned
776:informed
628:RadioFan
609:StAnselm
385:WP:CIVIL
111:View log
852:Comment
810:Comment
535:Comment
377:Comment
156:WPĀ refs
144:scholar
84:protect
79:history
834:Delete
648:Bejnar
643:Delete
624:Delete
605:Userfy
584:WP:GNG
580:Delete
511:WP:BLP
507:Delete
411:Delete
381:WP:NPA
128:Google
88:delete
50:Jayjg
46:delete
563:Nsk92
522:Nsk92
188:WP:RS
171:JSTOR
132:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
1075:talk
996:and
949:Keep
939:bomb
904:talk
890:talk
882:here
864:talk
843:talk
823:talk
794:talk
747:Keep
733:talk
663:Keep
652:talk
632:talk
613:talk
596:talk
567:talk
544:talk
526:talk
497:ping
493:Pcap
482:Note
471:ping
467:Pcap
456:Note
445:ping
441:Pcap
430:Note
419:talk
398:talk
383:and
364:talk
324:talk
268:talk
234:talk
206:Keep
197:talk
164:FENS
138:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
491:--
465:--
439:--
217:.
178:TWL
113:ā¢
109:ā (
1077:)
1069:--
906:)
892:)
866:)
845:)
837:--
825:)
800:)
796:ā¢
735:)
727:--
654:)
646:--
634:)
615:)
598:)
569:)
546:)
528:)
520:.
488:.
462:.
436:.
421:)
400:)
366:)
326:)
318:--
311:.
270:)
262:--
236:)
199:)
158:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
1073:(
973:.
967:;
902:(
888:(
862:(
841:(
821:(
792:(
731:(
650:(
630:(
611:(
594:(
565:(
542:(
524:(
425:)
417:(
396:(
362:(
344:.
322:(
266:(
232:(
195:(
182:)
174:Ā·
168:Ā·
160:Ā·
153:Ā·
147:Ā·
141:Ā·
135:Ā·
130:(
122:(
119:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.