758:
on child pornography or necrophillia or beastiality be removed because it might give people ideas??? NO! At the end of the day, there are people who can genuinely use this information in an educational way, + wikipedia does not show the photo's AND should not link to them. finally, wikipedia is an encyclopedia based website (duh i know), but an encyclopedia is supposed to be nonbiased, so long as the page stays relevant and does not include links to picture and respectful then keep it.
148:
for her accident, the photographs and the lawsuit, instead of about her (a non-notable teenage girl who died in a tragic accident). BLP may be taken into consideration given that it's an ongoing legal case involving the family etcetera, but if the case leads to a change in the law I believe it may be
139:
I created this article myself a few months ago. I believe some people here may know about this story - basically, a girl in
California who died in a car crash, then photos of her fatal accident were leaked to the internet, resulting in a legal case, which may yet lead to a change in the law. It meets
757:
Opinion only, will not pretend I know rules of wikipedia, would just like to give my two cents. This article lists an important controversy in various factors -leaking documents, about Nikki etc. Knowledge (XXG) is also not responsible for the actions of the users of their website. Should an article
213:
was created for. The only possible justification for this article, aside from the brief media coverage, is that it provides a route to the real story and the tragic experience of the family for the 99% of people who only saw the gruesome photos (and I'm not looking now, but I think even Snopes omits
724:
precludes its applicability in almost all cases. Every event can be subdivided into multiple events. Take for example this case: The question of druge in her system is another "event", the act of forwarding the pictured is another "event", and the posting of the pics online is another "event.") The
140:
verifiability at the basic level, being covered by several U.S. news sources, although it doesn't seem to have reached an international level of coverage (for example, I have no evidence whatsoever that the story was ever covered in the U.K. media). Also, it may fail
319:
That might be a matter of perception. CHP has formally taken responsibility for the photos; the issue is whether legal liability flows from that. And even if CHP is totally vindicated, the written record of the debate over this will outlive us all.
352:
article. I feel if that were the case, it would be undue weight, of the importance of the case. I think we are on the same side – saying the same thing but I am talking Philly and you are using proper
English :-).
697:
does not apply because there were three events - the crash, the pictures being taken, and the lawsuit. These events and the young woman are notable and many sources exist (as shown on the page itself)
171:– Sorry to say. As the nominator points out, the individual, in and of themselves, is not notable for any other reason than the circumstances of one event. In that the one event cannot bestow
472:, at least in some form. I read an article mentioning the incident and did a google search on the victim's name. I was glad to find a Knowledge (XXG) article that answered my questions.
259:
I could endorse a merger, too, if consensus goes that way. It probably deserves no more than a sentence or two. Also, we don't have an article for the Alton
Parkway, where it happened. --
443:
132:
725:
point is, WP's policy is to avoid bios of everyone who got an above average fifteen minutes of fame. If the said person was involved in a notable event than -
412:
644:
536:
587:
157:
569:
149:
genuinely encyclopedic enough, but at the moment, I'm not totally sure and have different feelings now than to when I created the article.
62:
640:
532:
479:
379:
Haha... yes, it sounds like we are. I agree on the undue weight - a Cliffs-Notes of the article would certainly strike me as adequate.
99:
94:
103:
17:
776:
I don't think that anyone here has asserted that the article be deleted because it will give people bad ideas regarding the pics. --
514:
281:- Typically you are right, a merge under the heading {Controversy} would be appropriate. However, a Judge has already ruled that
784:
737:
676:
602:
86:
660:. I can't believe I made such a huge mistake, linking to the correct guideline albeit using the technically incorrect alphabet.
763:
814:
36:
321:
531:
It seems to be at least two events, the death and the subsequent legal action on an
Internet related litigation. --
322:(This is the latest news story I was able to find about the proceedings - which is already a ref in the article.)
235:
813:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
759:
564:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
483:
344:– I should have started out saying I see no problem with a redirect and a mentioning of the situation on the
794:
767:
747:
707:
686:
648:
629:
612:
575:
540:
521:
487:
461:
430:
388:
367:
332:
307:
267:
247:
226:
197:
162:
68:
475:
176:
172:
508:
456:
425:
151:
721:
717:
694:
665:
210:
145:
789:
742:
681:
607:
90:
215:
620:
If we don't merge with CHP, I can get behind this as an equally appropriate (and easier) solution.
559:
556:
355:
295:
185:
52:
49:
625:
384:
328:
264:
243:
223:
713:
591:
238:. Unless I overlooked it on my quick skim, this case isn't even mentioned on the CHP page yet.
141:
703:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
720:
doesn't require that the event be in actuality one event. (As an aside, your understaning of
500:
450:
419:
206:
180:
779:
732:
671:
597:
82:
74:
285:
has no liability in the case. Yes, I understand the ruling is under appeal. However, if
621:
380:
324:
260:
239:
219:
699:
120:
550:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
639:
Dude, she is dead, BLP doesn't involve dead people, the "L" is for living. --
348:
page. What I would be against is a full blown merge of this article into the
290:
498:: If the author wants it and has some decent reasons, then so be it. –
214:
the worst one). That's not encyclopedic, though, and itself leans on
668:(links to the same exact guideline, but alphabetically correct). --
712:
You guys are taking the abbreviated shortcuts way too literally.
807:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
349:
345:
286:
282:
716:
doesn't require that the subject under discussion be alive and
127:
116:
112:
108:
289:
has no liability, than no {Controversy}. Call it a
555:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
817:). No further edits should be made to this page.
444:list of California-related deletion discussions
8:
442:: This debate has been included in the
413:list of Law-related deletion discussions
411:: This debate has been included in the
181:and Knowledge (XXG) is not a news source
588:Nikki Catsouras photographs controversy
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
727:Cover the event, not the person
641:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
533:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
1:
183:, I regretfully say delete.
48:, even after being relisted.
834:
177:notable only for one event
795:05:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
768:14:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
748:05:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
630:14:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
236:California Highway Patrol
69:01:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
810:Please do not modify it.
708:19:44, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
687:06:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
649:06:03, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
613:05:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
576:04:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
541:05:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
522:21:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
488:22:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
462:20:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
431:20:33, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
389:21:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
368:20:40, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
333:16:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
308:03:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
268:23:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
248:19:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
227:18:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
198:14:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
163:13:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
729:(bold in original).--
209:, and precisely what
175:as outlined in both
144:, and may also be a
760:Happiness in a pill
44:The result was
578:
520:
490:
478:comment added by
464:
447:
433:
416:
825:
812:
787:
782:
740:
735:
679:
674:
658:mea maxima culpa
605:
600:
572:
567:
562:
554:
552:
517:
511:
506:
503:
473:
459:
453:
448:
438:
428:
422:
417:
407:
366:
306:
196:
146:coatrack article
130:
124:
106:
65:
60:
55:
34:
833:
832:
828:
827:
826:
824:
823:
822:
821:
815:deletion review
808:
785:
780:
738:
733:
677:
672:
603:
598:
570:
565:
560:
548:
515:
509:
501:
457:
451:
426:
420:
354:
294:
184:
161:
158:r e s e a r c h
126:
97:
83:Nikki Catsouras
81:
78:
75:Nikki Catsouras
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
831:
829:
820:
819:
802:
800:
799:
798:
797:
771:
770:
752:
751:
750:
689:
651:
634:
633:
632:
580:
579:
553:
545:
544:
543:
525:
524:
492:
491:
466:
465:
435:
434:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
371:
370:
336:
335:
311:
310:
271:
270:
251:
250:
229:
200:
155:
137:
136:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
830:
818:
816:
811:
805:
804:
803:
796:
793:
792:
791:
788:
783:
775:
774:
773:
772:
769:
765:
761:
756:
753:
749:
746:
745:
744:
741:
736:
728:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
709:
705:
701:
696:
693:
690:
688:
685:
684:
683:
680:
675:
667:
663:
659:
655:
652:
650:
646:
642:
638:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
616:
615:
614:
611:
610:
609:
606:
601:
593:
589:
585:
582:
581:
577:
573:
568:
563:
558:
551:
547:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
527:
526:
523:
519:
518:
512:
505:
504:
497:
494:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:66.213.113.76
477:
471:
468:
467:
463:
460:
454:
445:
441:
437:
436:
432:
429:
423:
414:
410:
406:
405:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
374:
373:
372:
369:
365:
364:
361:
358:
351:
347:
343:
340:
339:
338:
337:
334:
330:
326:
323:
318:
315:
314:
313:
312:
309:
305:
304:
301:
298:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
269:
266:
262:
258:
255:
254:
253:
252:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
228:
225:
221:
217:
212:
208:
205:, definitely
204:
201:
199:
195:
194:
191:
188:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
166:
165:
164:
160:
159:
154:
153:
147:
143:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
809:
806:
801:
790:(yada, yada)
778:
777:
754:
743:(yada, yada)
731:
730:
726:
691:
682:(yada, yada)
670:
669:
661:
657:
653:
636:
617:
608:(yada, yada)
596:
595:
583:
549:
528:
507:
499:
495:
469:
439:
408:
376:
362:
359:
356:
341:
316:
302:
299:
296:
278:
256:
231:
202:
192:
189:
186:
168:
156:
150:
138:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
722:WP:ONEEVENT
718:WP:ONEEVENT
695:WP:ONEEVENT
666:WP:ONEEVENT
618:Endorsement
502:thedemonhog
474:—Preceding
452:Fabrictramp
421:Fabrictramp
211:WP:ONEEVENT
207:WP:NOT#NEWS
458:talk to me
427:talk to me
216:WP:SOAPBOX
173:Notability
692:Weak keep
714:WP:BLP1E
622:Townlake
592:WP:BLP1E
476:unsigned
381:Townlake
325:Townlake
291:Catch 22
261:Dhartung
240:Townlake
220:Dhartung
142:WP:BIO1E
133:View log
700:Ben1283
654:Comment
637:Comment
557:King of
377:Comment
342:Comment
317:Comment
279:Comment
257:Comment
100:protect
95:history
50:King of
786:crewer
739:crewer
678:crewer
604:crewer
496:Delete
360:hoesss
300:hoesss
203:Delete
190:hoesss
169:Delete
128:delete
104:delete
656:Sir:
516:edits
234:with
232:Merge
152:h i s
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
781:brew
764:talk
755:Keep
734:brew
704:talk
673:brew
664:per
662:Move
645:talk
626:talk
599:brew
594:. --
590:per
584:Move
537:talk
529:Keep
510:talk
484:talk
470:Keep
440:Note
409:Note
385:talk
350:CHIP
346:CHIP
329:talk
287:CHIP
283:CHIP
265:Talk
244:talk
224:Talk
218:. --
179:and
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
586:to
449:--
446:.
418:--
415:.
293:.
766:)
706:)
647:)
628:)
574:♠
539:)
513:•
486:)
455:|
424:|
387:)
331:)
263:|
246:)
222:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:♠
762:(
702:(
643:(
624:(
571:♣
566:♦
561:♥
535:(
482:(
383:(
363:S
357:S
327:(
303:S
297:S
242:(
193:S
187:S
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.