401:. Ihis is not a vote. It is a process to query notability and reach consensus. Your "keep" !vote is meaningless. The effective approach is to find sources and bring them here or put them on the page. the sources need to be reputable publications that report on her and her career. Not the bylines you used as "references."
513:). Third, writing for NY Times magazine and Atlantic etc is pretty much the top of the US journalistic pyramid. Fourth, she is seen by the journalistic community as the go-to person on civil rights. Fifth, she has been a panelist on national radio broadcasts such as PBS and NPR. Sixth, she gave a
578:
I'm with Tom here. Although some of the links are staff bios on employers' sites, overall it adds up, the awards, the citations, and the invitations as panelist and speaker. She doesn't just exist, she's been noted (and cited) by quite a lot of people.
492:. And I agree a journalist should not being notable if they only have bylines but the content is not about the subject. However, this is not the case with this Nikole Hannah-Jones. First, her reporting on resegregation
172:
338:
For a journalist to have an article, it is necessary that reliable sources have written about her and her career. The fact that she has been published by major news outlets is not sufficient.
125:
555:
166:
526:
267:
505:
425:
websites. The only legitimate secondary source you added anywhere in the entire article is a blurb of less than 100 words in length, which thus fails to count as
301:
497:
132:
98:
93:
504:
and have inspired new thinking about worsening segregation in schools; her work exposing the "deep correlations between housing and poverty" was
102:
85:
501:
534:
17:
187:
222:, such as her "our writers" profiles on the websites of the publications she writes for, or articles in which she's the bylined
154:
242:
on the fact that she exists, in an article that contains no substantive content about her beyond the fact that she exists.
380:
322:
288:
611:
40:
530:
219:
148:
592:
567:
546:
474:
422:
410:
361:
347:
327:
293:
259:
67:
238:
here is the kind of sourcing that gets a journalist into
Knowledge (XXG) — and all of it is piled up as a single
144:
316:
282:
89:
398:
385:
376:
335:
580:
211:
194:
389:
607:
406:
357:
343:
36:
542:
538:
518:
239:
180:
81:
73:
457:
solid source — but that's still not enough to get her into
Knowledge (XXG) if it's the article's
160:
61:
234:
her in any substantive way is #6, which is just a blurb on the news blog of a marketing agency.
514:
588:
563:
470:
255:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
606:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
55:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
522:
402:
353:
339:
310:
276:
203:
421:
sources, but is based almost entirely on her own self-penned public relations profiles on
418:
207:
584:
559:
466:
251:
119:
305:
271:
246:, without prejudice against recreation in the future if it can be sourced
429:
coverage. Having profiles on the websites of her own employers is
600:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
417:
No, it doesn't. The article cites no substantive coverage in
226:
rather than, as required to pass our notability rules, the
206:
of a journalist which makes and sources no strong claim of
496:
becoming the story: her reports have been widely hailed
510:
489:
375:
Subject has more than enough references to be notable.
115:
111:
107:
179:
388:
is the creator of this article. Disclosure added per
193:
508:. Second, she won numerous awards (my count =: -->
453:of the subject. E.M. Gregory added the article's
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
614:). No further edits should be made to this page.
537:. Overall, a serious investigative journalist.--
556:list of News media-related deletion discussions
8:
554:Note: This debate has been included in the
300:Note: This debate has been included in the
268:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
266:Note: This debate has been included in the
553:
465:other coverage can be found besides that.
299:
265:
302:list of Iowa-related deletion discussions
521:. There are in-depth articles about her
441:gets into Knowledge (XXG) — it takes
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
218:, and sources it almost entirely to
24:
352:added a minor prize to the page.
230:. The only source here that's
1:
593:16:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
568:00:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
547:19:40, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
475:15:59, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
411:19:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
362:11:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
348:11:40, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
328:03:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
294:03:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
260:21:05, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
214:— it just asserts that she
68:03:00, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
631:
517:. Article improved as per
603:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
488:I agree article was in
461:substantive source and
399:User:Neptune's Trident
386:User:Neptune's Trident
336:User:Neptune's Trident
583:# 1 and # 4 a and c.
82:Nikole Hannah-Jones
74:Nikole Hannah-Jones
419:reliable secondary
570:
393:
377:Neptune's Trident
330:
326:
296:
292:
59:
56:non-admin closure
622:
605:
447:reliable sources
384:
308:
274:
198:
197:
183:
135:
123:
105:
64:
62:
53:
34:
630:
629:
625:
624:
623:
621:
620:
619:
618:
612:deletion review
601:
220:primary sources
140:
131:
96:
80:
77:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
628:
626:
617:
616:
596:
595:
572:
571:
550:
549:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
423:primary source
415:
414:
413:
367:
366:
365:
364:
332:
331:
297:
201:
200:
137:
76:
71:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
627:
615:
613:
609:
604:
598:
597:
594:
590:
586:
582:
581:WP:JOURNALIST
577:
574:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
552:
551:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
507:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
484:
483:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
396:
395:
394:
391:
387:
382:
378:
374:
371:
370:
369:
368:
363:
359:
355:
351:
350:
349:
345:
341:
337:
334:
333:
329:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
307:
303:
298:
295:
290:
287:
284:
281:
278:
273:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:WP:JOURNALIST
209:
205:
196:
192:
189:
186:
182:
178:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
146:
143:
142:Find sources:
138:
134:
130:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
65:
63:Esquivalience
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
602:
599:
575:
493:
485:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:coverage in
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
390:WP:AFDFORMAT
372:
319:
313:
285:
279:
247:
243:
235:
231:
227:
223:
215:
202:
190:
184:
176:
169:
163:
157:
151:
141:
128:
60:
49:
47:
31:
28:
451:independent
443:substantive
427:substantive
403:E.M.Gregory
354:E.M.Gregory
340:E.M.Gregory
167:free images
539:Tomwsulcer
519:WP:HEYMANN
506:cited here
449:which are
240:WP:REFBOMB
208:notability
608:talk page
560:• Gene93k
490:bad shape
37:talk page
610:or in a
515:TED talk
248:properly
126:View log
39:or in a
585:Kraxler
511:article
509:8; see
467:Bearcat
437:person
252:Bearcat
236:Nothing
228:subject
173:WP refs
161:scholar
99:protect
94:history
306:JJMC89
272:JJMC89
244:Delete
224:author
216:exists
210:under
204:WP:BLP
145:Google
103:delete
232:about
188:JSTOR
149:books
133:Stats
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
589:talk
576:Keep
564:talk
543:talk
535:here
533:and
531:here
529:and
527:here
525:and
523:here
502:here
500:and
498:here
486:Keep
471:talk
459:only
455:only
439:ever
433:how
407:talk
381:talk
373:Keep
358:talk
344:talk
304:. —
270:. —
256:talk
181:FENS
155:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
50:keep
435:any
431:not
195:TWL
124:– (
52:.
591:)
566:)
558:.
545:)
494:is
473:)
463:no
409:)
383:)
360:)
346:)
258:)
250:.
175:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
587:(
562:(
541:(
469:(
405:(
392:.
379:(
356:(
342:(
325:)
323:C
320:·
317:E
314:·
311:T
309:(
291:)
289:C
286:·
283:E
280:·
277:T
275:(
254:(
199:)
191:·
185:·
177:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
147:(
139:(
136:)
129:·
122:)
84:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.