Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Nutriology - Knowledge (XXG)

Source ๐Ÿ“

119: 207:
as non-notable neologism. May have a few hits but we talk of nutrition and nutritionists. Never heard of a nutriologist and I work in health. cheers,
126:
Essentially spam for a book by Ken James. As a technical term "nutriology" is close to being a neologism. The article has been written by a number of
169: 17: 218: 143: 92: 87: 173: 96: 240: 36: 79: 239:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
177: 55: 222: 199: 187: 160: 147: 61: 212: 139: 168:
as spam but without prejudice. I don't think this is a neologism -- returns a healthy number of
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
50: 127: 196: 157: 83: 208: 195:
I don't even know if this Ken James is one of those in the disambig page- I doubt it.
135: 113: 75: 67: 131: 233:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109: 105: 101: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 243:). No further edits should be made to this page. 134:appears to be Ken James' personal imprint. -- 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 223:01:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC) 62:06:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC) 200:23:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 188:20:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 161:20:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 148:19:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 260: 236:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 156:it is just spam, imo. 176:as early as 1930. - 179:Revolving Bugbear 251: 238: 180: 117: 99: 58: 53: 34: 259: 258: 254: 253: 252: 250: 249: 248: 247: 241:deletion review 234: 178: 132:Papermill Press 90: 74: 71: 56: 51: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 257: 255: 246: 245: 228: 226: 225: 202: 190: 163: 124: 123: 70: 65: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 256: 244: 242: 237: 231: 230: 229: 224: 220: 217: 214: 210: 206: 203: 201: 198: 194: 191: 189: 185: 181: 175: 171: 167: 164: 162: 159: 155: 152: 151: 150: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 60: 59: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 235: 232: 227: 215: 204: 192: 183: 165: 153: 125: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 184:Che Nuevara 197:Merkinsmum 182:(formerly 174:was in use 158:Springnuts 76:Nutriology 68:Nutriology 219:contribs 209:Casliber 144:contribs 136:RHaworth 120:View log 93:protect 88:history 205:Delete 193:delete 166:Delete 154:Delete 97:delete 57:larity 46:delete 170:ghits 114:views 106:watch 102:links 52:Singu 16:< 213:talk 172:and 140:Talk 130:and 128:spas 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 118:โ€“ ( 221:) 186:) 146:) 142:| 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 48:. 216:ยท 211:( 138:( 122:) 116:) 78:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Singu
larity
06:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Nutriology
Nutriology
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
spas
Papermill Press
RHaworth
Talk
contribs
19:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Springnuts
20:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
ghits
was in use
Revolving Bugbear
20:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Merkinsmum

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘