194:
DNA microarrays are a sufficiently large & important subject for articles on specialized aspects to be justified. some of the detail does have to be reduced--that's an editing decision, & to improve the article, as encouraged during AfD, I have just removed some of the more obvious.
176:
about dealing with the large volume of data that results from DNA analysis. Well, particle physics and astronomy generate lots of data too, but we don't have how-to articles for their gory technical details. Also it looks like a big stinking copyvio.
133:- I tend to agree, but because it's so detailed someone may wish to take on rewriting it, or it could be tranwikied in some way to Wikibooks or another source. Either way probably too long for a basic prod, so have put it here.
339:. Just like we have wiki entries for specific computer algorithms (Shor's Factorization, Karmakar's Algorithm etc.) so should we have expository articles on bioinformatics algorithms and SAM is certainly one of the good ones.
315:, the computer program and the statistical technique upon which it is based are certainly notable, and it is possible to review the use and functioning of this program in an encyclopedic manner eg
89:
84:
93:
76:
122:
289:
80:
72:
64:
322:, so the fact that the present article is a bit of a step-by-step guide isn't be a reason why Knowledge shouldn't have an article on the subject.
354:
331:
306:
275:
252:
231:
206:
186:
160:
142:
58:
346:
17:
216:
as the subject is veriable and notable (there should be plenty of references for data analysis of microarrays in any of the
240:
370:
301:
156:
36:
369:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
350:
248:
182:
138:
342:
327:
296:
152:
130:
53:
244:
178:
316:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
129:
Was listed on CSD, then PROD, but I've moved it here. Reason given for PROD was violate of
323:
169:
134:
202:
265:
221:
110:
48:
per near-unanimity of responses. (non-admin closure). Article is well-referenced.
319:
197:
264:
Probably. Not my field of expertise, otherwise I'd take a stab at it. --
217:
220:
journals. A need for cleanup doesn't result in a need to delete.
363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
52:
S with writing style are not sufficient grounds for deletion.
117:
106:
102:
98:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
373:). No further edits should be made to this page.
151:. Notable subject, but it needs wikification.
8:
290:list of Science-related deletion discussions
73:SAM: Significance Analysis of Microarrays
65:SAM: Significance Analysis of Microarrays
288:: This debate has been included in the
243:article? Is this the only methodology?
7:
24:
241:data analysis of DNA microarrays
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
172:. Note that this article is
390:
332:23:03, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
307:19:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
276:02:42, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
253:02:34, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
232:23:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
207:18:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
187:13:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
161:06:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
143:02:51, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
366:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
355:14:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
59:00:16, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
239:should there be a
44:The result was
357:
345:comment added by
309:
305:
293:
381:
368:
340:
299:
294:
284:
273:
270:
229:
226:
120:
114:
96:
56:
34:
389:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
379:
378:
377:
371:deletion review
364:
297:Espresso Addict
271:
266:
227:
222:
153:Titanium Dragon
116:
87:
71:
68:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
387:
385:
376:
375:
359:
358:
347:141.212.142.75
334:
310:
281:
280:
279:
278:
256:
255:
234:
210:
209:
189:
170:DNA microarray
163:
127:
126:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
386:
374:
372:
367:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
338:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
314:
311:
308:
303:
298:
291:
287:
283:
282:
277:
274:
269:
263:
260:
259:
258:
257:
254:
250:
246:
245:Potatoswatter
242:
238:
235:
233:
230:
225:
219:
215:
212:
211:
208:
204:
200:
199:
193:
190:
188:
184:
180:
179:Potatoswatter
175:
171:
167:
164:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
140:
136:
132:
124:
119:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
365:
362:
336:
312:
285:
267:
261:
236:
223:
213:
196:
191:
173:
166:Merge/delete
165:
148:
131:WP:NOTMANUAL
128:
45:
43:
31:
28:
341:—Preceding
324:Tim Vickers
50:WP:PROBLEM
135:Esteffect
55:Skomorokh
343:unsigned
320:17603887
123:View log
262:Comment
237:Comment
90:protect
85:history
272:figura
228:figura
218:-omics
118:delete
94:delete
121:) – (
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
351:talk
337:Keep
328:talk
317:PMID
313:Keep
302:talk
286:Note
249:talk
214:Keep
203:talk
192:Keep
183:talk
174:only
157:talk
149:Keep
139:talk
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
46:keep
292:.
198:DGG
168:to
353:)
330:)
251:)
205:)
185:)
159:)
141:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
349:(
326:(
304:)
300:(
295:—
268:B
247:(
224:B
201:(
181:(
155:(
137:(
125:)
115:(
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.