153:
the top 75 list was sourced via a forum and was 6 years out dated. This however, is sourced from the magazine and was just recently released. Most of the stuff on
Knowledge (XXG) is sourced from "some editors in a magazine" or newspaper. From the NYTimes to Reuters, etc. it's all from various editors.
152:
Actually, they have a ton of criteria. The article has the sources and each person listed has a detailed explaination on why they are ranked in such order, i.e. impact, statistical output, championships, team chemistry, era, coaching effects, etc. I added the article to replace the old list because
197:
Even besides all of that, I'm not even remotely convinced that it's notable: Rolling Stone (as much as they may be disagreeable) is an incredibly notable magazine, and its lists there are oft used as benchmarks for later "greatest music" lists; I fail to see any similar historical relevance for this
141:
This is yet another "X's List of Top X" type article. It has the same problem they all do, which is that there is no reliable sourcing here. It's basically a list made up by some editors of a magazine. It's non-notable fancruft type stuff. As I've said before, if it's
Billboard magazine, it's
74:
101:
96:
105:
180:) - those lists are clearly notable, but at one point were a reproduction of the entire list. This was discussed and considered to be a copyvio in the US (various links to discussions on the subject coming up:
88:
134:
146:
223:
185:
181:
142:
different because they have a reliable, secure basis for their charts. These articles are basically a bunch of editors in a room deciding who is fantastic without any criteria.
189:
249:
311:
289:
264:
238:
211:
162:
58:
92:
198:
list. A list on its own, even in a notable magazine, does not inherently infer notability. No coverage in third party sources = delete.
173:
177:
84:
64:
17:
172:, but not for reasons listed: copyright concerns here, for the same thing discussed with regards to the Rolling Stones 500s lists (
207:
326:
36:
325:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
308:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
192:). Additionally, if you wished to cull it to show only an excerpt, this page would be left with little left.
260:
234:
285:
305:
256:
230:
158:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
281:
203:
143:
301:
154:
122:
199:
49:
275:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
75:
Articles for deletion/SLAM Magazine's Top 50 Players of All-Time (NBA)
319:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
129:
118:
114:
110:
224:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
280:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
329:). No further edits should be made to this page.
85:SLAM Magazine's Top 50 Players of All-Time (NBA)
65:SLAM Magazine's Top 50 Players of All-Time (NBA)
63:
250:list of Basketball-related deletion discussions
304:have been provided that discuss this list. --
8:
244:
218:
248:: This debate has been included in the
222:: This debate has been included in the
72:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
174:The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time
71:
178:The 500 Greatest Songs of All Time
24:
1:
302:independent reliable sources
346:
265:11:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
239:11:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
212:09:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
163:07:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
147:05:55, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
322:Please do not modify it.
312:01:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
290:00:36, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
59:08:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
70:AfDs for this article:
44:The result was
292:
267:
253:
241:
227:
337:
324:
279:
277:
254:
228:
144:User:Woohookitty
132:
126:
108:
34:
345:
344:
340:
339:
338:
336:
335:
334:
333:
327:deletion review
320:
273:
128:
99:
83:
80:
68:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
343:
341:
332:
331:
315:
314:
306:Metropolitan90
294:
293:
278:
270:
269:
268:
242:
215:
214:
194:
193:
166:
165:
139:
138:
79:
78:
77:
69:
67:
62:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
342:
330:
328:
323:
317:
316:
313:
310:
307:
303:
299:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
276:
272:
271:
266:
262:
258:
251:
247:
243:
240:
236:
232:
225:
221:
217:
216:
213:
209:
205:
201:
196:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
167:
164:
160:
156:
151:
150:
149:
148:
145:
136:
131:
124:
120:
116:
112:
107:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
81:
76:
73:
66:
61:
60:
57:
55:
54:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
321:
318:
300:per nom. No
297:
274:
257:TexasAndroid
245:
231:TexasAndroid
219:
169:
140:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
282:Ron Ritzman
208:contribs
135:View log
155:Zodiiak
102:protect
97:history
309:(talk)
298:Delete
200:AllynJ
170:Delete
130:delete
106:delete
46:delete
133:) – (
123:views
115:watch
111:links
16:<
286:talk
261:talk
246:Note
235:talk
220:Note
204:talk
176:and
159:talk
119:logs
93:talk
89:edit
255:--
229:--
53:Nja
288:)
263:)
252:.
237:)
226:.
210:)
206:|
188:,
184:,
161:)
121:|
117:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
48:.
284:(
259:(
233:(
202:(
190:3
186:2
182:1
157:(
137:)
127:(
125:)
87:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.