193:
The fact is they did receive MTV and other significant, verifiable coverage. It's obviously non-trivial to some people; you seem to ignore that and suggest deletion instead because it's something "nobody in their right minds would do". I might not think it's a smart thing to do or something I would
140:
What are you trynig to verify exactly? Its noted for purprose of satisfying
Notability, not verifiability. The ipod was bought and smashed, this is a known, filmed incident. The fact that the creator, who is known just for this, was highlighted on MTV, which I noted the feature was on him, just goes
181:. Receiving MTV coverage for doing something nobody in their right minds would do is up to MTV editors. Knock yerself out if you wanna go smashing iPods and Xboxes, just pouring money down the drain. It ain't grow into a minor cultural phenomenon.
125:
like the
National Enquirer should be used for verification, concidering the other stories like 5 foot tall grasshoppers and bat-dogs. The MTV: Obsessed feature was on the creator...not the website. It has always been a NN meme on the net.
141:
to show how much notability he does in fact have, or at least the project. You say its NN, yet it was notable to be in the
Enquirer, Engadget and notable enough to have MTV do a feature on the creator of the project. --
95:
I wanted so badly to say delete, however it turns out I found an inquirer article and engadget about the project and an MTV: Obsessed feature on the creator. --
64:
Unimportance and lack of interest of whoever created the page to make it informative. Not every website is a notable internet meme.
17:
151:
105:
281:
36:
280:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
266:
248:
234:
212:
198:
185:
169:
155:
132:
109:
87:
68:
52:
122:
260:
to this as well since we now know people directly related to the site are editing the page? --
118:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
257:
231:
182:
195:
166:
143:
97:
65:
58:
261:
224:
and that's an incomplete listing. - Ben Lovatt, part of the SmashOurStuff.com crew.
209:
178:
127:
243:
82:
242:
Per nom and also.. shall we put an article for any prank or funny gag made? --
49:
221:
274:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
194:
ever do, but looking at this objectively, it is notable.
165:
It's received attention from
Engadget and MTV. Notable.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
284:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
230:I agree that it got quite some attention.
177:per triviality of actions and coverage
7:
24:
222:http://smashourstuff.com/news.php
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
220:Check out the media coverage:
1:
267:21:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
249:00:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
235:19:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
213:04:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
199:06:10, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
186:03:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
170:18:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
156:17:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
133:15:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
110:15:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
88:10:13, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
69:06:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
53:09:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
301:
277:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
48:, default to keep. -
123:Supermarket tabloid
119:yellow journalism
81:. It's a NN meme
292:
279:
264:
150:
148:
130:
117:I don't think a
104:
102:
85:
34:
300:
299:
295:
294:
293:
291:
290:
289:
288:
282:deletion review
275:
262:
144:
142:
128:
98:
96:
83:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
298:
296:
287:
286:
270:
269:
256:Should we add
251:
237:
225:
215:
203:
202:
201:
172:
160:
159:
158:
112:
90:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
297:
285:
283:
278:
272:
271:
268:
265:
259:
255:
252:
250:
247:
246:
241:
238:
236:
233:
229:
226:
223:
219:
216:
214:
211:
207:
204:
200:
197:
192:
189:
188:
187:
184:
180:
176:
173:
171:
168:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:
149:
147:
139:
136:
135:
134:
131:
124:
120:
116:
113:
111:
108:
107:
103:
101:
94:
91:
89:
86:
80:
76:
73:
72:
71:
70:
67:
60:
59:Smash My iPod
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
276:
273:
253:
244:
239:
227:
217:
205:
190:
174:
162:
152:
145:
137:
114:
106:
99:
92:
78:
74:
63:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
232:JeroenRoshi
183:Ohconfucius
146:zero faults
100:zero faults
208:per above
196:Ryanminier
167:Ryanminier
66:- Rogsheng
258:WP:VANITY
254:Comment
210:Zazaban
191:Comment
138:Comment
245:Deenoe
240:Delete
175:Delete
121:paper/
115:Delete
84:Lurker
79:Delete
77:, er,
75:Smash!
263:Brian
179:WP:NN
129:Brian
50:Bobet
16:<
228:Keep
218:Keep
206:Keep
163:Keep
93:keep
126:--
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.