289:. If there was a section in Snowden's article for appearances in "other media" (games, television shows such as South Park, etc) then I'd suggest a merge there. I have no problem with anyone wanting to add such a section to his article if there's enough out there to warrant it being added. Otherwise DGG is right- the coverage of this is fairly trivial when you get down to brass tacks. There wasn't that much coverage of the game, all things considered, and what is on the article is pretty much it for the most part. There do not seem to be any reviews in any reliable sources and a lot of the coverage on other sites tends to be just a repost of one of the articles already on this page. I have no problem with some of this being re-created in the future if the programmer's other game gets notice (although I note that the
385:- This article was first nominated for deletion in October 2013. The result of the discussion was no consensus. This second nomination, coming just four months later, is unwarranted. Edward Snowden is still very much in the news, and only this past week a $ 99 Snowden Action Figure was introduced onto the market, with considerable media coverage. The video game article thus remains pertinent to an overall understanding of Snowden's cultural impact. If an editor finds fault with its particulars, revise it. But there's no reason to delete it.
445:
366:. It no longer looks like garbage, and has been expanded to just more than a stub currently. (Side note: So the arguments don't go there down the road, my motivations to save the article are not politically based at all. I'm largely indifferent there. I'm motivated to save something related to video games and parody, that's all.)
436:. If no further sources arise and a better merge location appears, I'd entertain that, but there certainly isn't ample reason for deletion in its current state. And if it helps, when I think of whether a seemingly inane VG article will survive an AfD, I compare it to
187:
86:
140:
237:
181:
81:
147:
444:
328:
267:
251:
113:
108:
402:
Per
Sergecross73. Notability is established via multiple reliable sources already, as the nom noted in the deletion rationale.... --
17:
117:
324:
458:
423:
411:
394:
377:
354:
311:
281:
255:
229:
65:
297:
100:
266:: I'm cleaning the article and I noticed that several of the sources were repeats of the Kotaku source. I did remove one from
202:
169:
477:
40:
294:
163:
247:
340:
300:
so it's a bit soon to have an article for the programmer) but this just doesn't justify an article right now.
159:
438:
372:
349:
218:
I sm aware this has references. It is nonetheless totally trivial, and inappropriate for an encyclopedia.
473:
390:
319:- When a video game is getting dedicated articles devoted to covering a video game, it easily meets the
304:
274:
36:
209:
241:
195:
104:
59:
290:
367:
344:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
472:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
407:
386:
301:
271:
175:
433:
363:
362:- I have completely reorganized and rewritten the article to demonstrate that it meets the
320:
420:
96:
71:
54:
225:
134:
403:
432:. As the subject of several dedicated, reliable articles, this topic meets the
331:. Not passing mentions, but full articles on it. Sure, Reviews/Reception are a
419:, as the subject of non-trivial works in reputable and independent sources.
452:
220:
466:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
341:
But it doesn't matter, because that's not a reason to delete it
270:
that didn't really look like it'd be a RS per our guidelines.
323:. I mean, there are high level sources covering this, like
293:
has received little attention and most of the coverage is
335:
path to meeting the GNG, but they're certainly not the
130:
126:
122:
194:
339:
way. Is it a terrible, cookie-cutter game? Probably.
87:
Articles for deletion/Snowden Run 3D (2nd nomination)
208:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
480:). No further edits should be made to this page.
238:list of video games-related deletion discussions
8:
236:Note: This debate has been included in the
235:
79:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
82:Articles for deletion/Snowden Run 3D
78:
24:
443:
1:
412:02:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
395:02:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
378:19:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
355:17:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
312:06:33, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
282:06:25, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
256:05:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
230:05:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
497:
459:22:58, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
424:04:07, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
66:05:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
469:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
439:Microshaft Winblows 98
77:AfDs for this article:
291:IndieGoGo fundraiser
48:The result was
258:
488:
471:
457:
455:
451:
447:
375:
370:
352:
347:
308:
278:
244:
213:
212:
198:
150:
138:
120:
64:
34:
496:
495:
491:
490:
489:
487:
486:
485:
484:
478:deletion review
467:
453:
449:
448:
373:
368:
350:
345:
306:
276:
242:
155:
146:
111:
95:
92:
75:
53:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
494:
492:
483:
482:
462:
461:
427:
414:
397:
380:
357:
314:
284:
260:
259:
243:Dharmadhyaksha
216:
215:
152:
97:Snowden Run 3D
91:
90:
89:
84:
76:
74:
72:Snowden Run 3D
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
493:
481:
479:
475:
470:
464:
463:
460:
456:
446:
441:
440:
435:
431:
428:
425:
422:
418:
415:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
376:
371:
365:
361:
358:
356:
353:
348:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
313:
310:
309:
303:
299:
298:notifications
296:
292:
288:
285:
283:
280:
279:
273:
269:
265:
262:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
239:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
222:
211:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:Find sources:
153:
149:
145:
142:
136:
132:
128:
124:
119:
115:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
88:
85:
83:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
468:
465:
437:
429:
416:
399:
382:
369:Sergecross73
359:
346:Sergecross73
336:
332:
316:
305:
286:
275:
268:Hot Hardware
263:
219:
217:
205:
199:
191:
184:
178:
172:
166:
156:
143:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
387:JohnValeron
302:Tokyogirl79
272:Tokyogirl79
182:free images
474:talk page
421:Lankiveil
55:Mojo Hand
37:talk page
476:or in a
141:View log
39:or in a
360:Comment
307:(｡◕‿◕｡)
277:(｡◕‿◕｡)
264:Comment
188:WP refs
176:scholar
114:protect
109:history
404:ferret
374:msg me
364:WP:GNG
351:msg me
333:common
321:WP:GNG
287:Delete
160:Google
118:delete
226:talk
203:JSTOR
164:books
148:Stats
135:views
127:watch
123:links
16:<
450:czar
430:Keep
417:Keep
408:talk
400:Keep
391:talk
383:Keep
337:only
327:and
317:Keep
295:just
246:§§ {
240:. §§
196:FENS
170:news
131:logs
105:talk
101:edit
60:talk
50:keep
434:GNG
329:CNN
325:CBS
221:DGG
210:TWL
139:– (
442:.
410:)
393:)
343:.
254:}
228:)
190:)
133:|
129:|
125:|
121:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
52:.
454:♔
426:.
406:(
389:(
252:C
250:/
248:T
224:(
214:)
206:·
200:·
192:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
162:(
154:(
151:)
144:·
137:)
99:(
62:)
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.