145:
I know that the merger is definitely going to happen (that wasn't my point). As the new franchise is essentially just incorporating the Island Line into the South West Trains franchise, and there is a full description of what's going to happen can be found at the SWT page, so this article is just
128:
the current franchises are both due to expire in early 2007. There has been comment that the new franchise is going to be South
Western as it covers the SW region. This article shows the definte merger and also shows there is a need for expansion. The merger
159:. If Stagecoach win the franchise and continue to run it under the South West Trains brand then it would probably make sense to merge it into that article. However, speculating on who will win the franchise and what the brand name of it will be
179:
There's no point in having this article until the process is sorted and we know what exactly the full details of the new franchise are (such as who's going to operate it, what it'll be called etc). Using
188:
article until the new company was virtually up and running. At the moment, it'd be much better to keep what few details are known as sections on the South West Trains and Island Line pages.
181:
17:
106:
217:
36:
113:
216:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
50:
105:, that the franchises will be merged has been announced by the DfT, with invitations issued to bidders. See
202:
167:
150:
137:
120:
97:
80:
60:
185:
156:
134:
109:
73:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
90:
198:, likely search term, if the details are better somewhere else should be a soft redirect.
189:
164:
117:
94:
56:
147:
77:
66:
199:
155:
My point is that the information should be in this article rather than at
133:
going to happen. This article is not predicting, it is showing...
210:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
112:
should really be moved here to save duplicating it at the
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
184:as an example, that was kept as a section on the
220:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
108:. The content that is currently at
89:Talks about a possible merger, but
24:
146:duplicating that information. --
72:Content is already available at
1:
44:The result of the debate was
237:
203:09:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
168:21:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
151:16:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
138:15:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
121:08:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
114:Island Line, Isle of Wight
98:04:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
81:22:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
61:14:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
213:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
186:South Eastern Trains
192:12/04/06, 18.45 BST
46:no consensus; keep
163:crystal ballism.
157:South West Trains
110:South West Trains
74:South West Trains
228:
215:
93:a crystal ball.
53:
34:
236:
235:
231:
230:
229:
227:
226:
225:
224:
218:deletion review
211:
70:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
234:
232:
223:
222:
206:
205:
193:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
123:
100:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
233:
221:
219:
214:
208:
207:
204:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
178:
175:
169:
166:
162:
158:
154:
153:
152:
149:
144:
141:
140:
139:
136:
132:
127:
124:
122:
119:
115:
111:
107:
104:
101:
99:
96:
92:
88:
85:
84:
83:
82:
79:
75:
68:
67:South Western
65:
63:
62:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
212:
209:
195:
182:Southeastern
176:
160:
142:
135:Simply south
130:
125:
102:
86:
71:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
190:Hammersfan
165:Thryduulf
118:Thryduulf
116:article.
95:Sandstein
148:RFBailey
143:Comment.
78:RFBailey
57:ilo-Lima
87:Delete.
177:Delete
91:WP:NOT
200:Kappa
16:<
196:Keep
126:Keep
103:Keep
161:is
131:IS
76:.
59:|
48:.
52:K
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.