338:. From what I can tell, most of those are either (1) direct quotes from the section of the Doctrine and Covenants that mentions him, (2) simple explanations of genealogical lines (for which Mormons are well known), (3) brief mentions in passing, or (4) the wrong Solomon Hancock. There is no subject-dedicated biography of this person that I can find; not even in article form.
285:"I believe that this individual is important enough for LDS history to be included in Knowledge (XXG). I am positive that some of the more notable parts of his life have been left out and would be glad to expand if someone could offer some insight on why he does not belong.
321:. It would be helpful if thoose calling for deletion could explain how the 300 or so books found by the spoon-fed Google Books search linked in the nomination, many of which appear to be about this Solomon Hancock, are not enough to confer notability.
154:
352:
Non-notable. He wrote a song, but the song does not appear to be notable per a Google search. The rest of the article is genealogical in nature and the references are not to
Reliable Sources. --
213:
115:
148:
239:
301:
88:
83:
92:
17:
185:
Not at all clear why he is notable, indeed no claim is made, seems only to have any significance at all to the LDS Church. Fails
75:
169:
136:
263:
as non-notable. Even within the Latter Day Saint movement, he is not particularly notable. Having been mentioned in the
376:
36:
283:: This comment was posted on the article talk page by an IP address; I suspect it may be from the article creator:
130:
375:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
361:
342:
330:
313:
297:
275:
254:
228:
202:
126:
57:
289:
326:
264:
79:
293:
53:
176:
71:
63:
339:
310:
272:
162:
357:
322:
268:
250:
224:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
142:
49:
186:
195:
353:
246:
220:
109:
190:
369:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
161:
175:
214:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
379:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
271:doesn't make a person notable, I'm afraid.
240:list of People-related deletion discussions
234:
208:
238:: This debate has been included in the
212:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
362:15:13, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
343:06:33, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
331:21:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
58:01:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
314:20:52, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
276:23:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
255:23:14, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
229:23:14, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
203:22:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
396:
267:or being an associate of
372:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
281:From article talk page
265:Doctrine and Covenants
198:Let’s have a chat.
44:The result was
306:
292:comment added by
269:Joseph Smith, Jr.
257:
243:
231:
217:
387:
374:
305:
286:
244:
218:
199:
193:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
395:
394:
390:
389:
388:
386:
385:
384:
383:
377:deletion review
370:
340:Good Ol’factory
311:Good Ol’factory
287:
273:Good Ol’factory
200:
197:
191:
122:
86:
72:Solomon Hancock
70:
67:
64:Solomon Hancock
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
393:
391:
382:
381:
365:
364:
347:
346:
345:
316:
278:
258:
232:
196:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
392:
380:
378:
373:
367:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
348:
344:
341:
337:
334:
333:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
315:
312:
308:
303:
299:
295:
294:69.169.136.43
291:
282:
279:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
259:
256:
252:
248:
241:
237:
233:
230:
226:
222:
215:
211:
207:
206:
205:
204:
201:
194:
188:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
371:
368:
349:
335:
323:Phil Bridger
318:
288:— Preceding
284:
280:
260:
235:
209:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
45:
43:
31:
28:
149:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
247:• Gene93k
221:• Gene93k
354:MelanieN
302:contribs
290:unsigned
116:View log
336:Comment
319:Comment
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
350:Delete
261:Delete
192:Paste
187:WP:BIO
127:Google
93:delete
46:delete
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
358:talk
327:talk
298:talk
251:talk
236:Note
225:talk
210:Note
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
245:--
219:--
177:TWL
114:– (
360:)
329:)
309:.
304:)
300:•
253:)
242:.
227:)
216:.
189:.
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
356:(
325:(
307:"
296:(
249:(
223:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.