393:, though axe the list of releases as completely unencyclopedic and blatant advertising. SonMay is one of the most notorious anime soundtrack bootleggers out there, and they have been written about in many ENglish-language anime and manga magazines since the early 1990s (I would have to hunt through a bunch to find them as it's been a long time since then and I don't remember exactly where they are mentioned). They are a bootlegger in that Taiwan doesn't (though this may have changed recently) recognize the
411:, whack the release list, add a notability tag, and give Nihonjoe (and anyone else who helps him) a month or so to dig out those hard-copy references. If found, remove the notability tag; if not, we can revisit the issue. If references are, indeed, largely pre-web, then five days won't be enough time to dig them up, which means it's time to
309:
I'd argue Sonmay are far more notable then is being assumed here, but certainly the lack of reliable sourcing doesn't warrant saving it (for the record that site was not a seller iirc). I'm in two minds really, the article could probably be saved, but reliable sources are usually wary of discussing
524:
is sufficient sources for a comprehensive article. Searches based on permutations of its
Chinese name "笙美貿易有限公司" also reveal no articles about the company by reliable sources. Nihonjoe, however, claims that he has a bunch of sources (among his vast collection or available to him, I presume) for
484:
to give Joe time to search for reliable sources. Given the notoriety that SonMay has among anime conventions and Sailor Moon fans, it is more then reasonable to assume that there is coverage by reliable sources within the anime community. If after a month and there are no reliable sources, the
397:, and SonMay doesn't license anything. In fact, their earliest bootlegs looked horrible and were not reliable. You could compare the packaging side by side with the original and easily see the difference. They have improved their skills since then. They are definitely notable. ···
432:: I'm with Quasi here. Nihonjoe is a well-established member of Knowledge with no personal interest in the article AFAIK and therefore no reason to lie about the sources. I'm not voting because I have no comment to make on the article, just wanted to lend my support to Joe. —
519:
One problem is that the subject seems only notable for being a bootlegger, and an article about it might be lacking in reliable sources to make it comprehensive (set up, history, location, operations, etc). One of the requirements in the
525:
this company. Userfying would allow him to work on it until a comprehensive article can be written. Otherwise, the company with its singular reliable source would serve as a notable example in bootleg recording.
394:
220:
128:
193:
247:
171:
443:
358:
310:
pirated media so it's not going to be a 5minute job. If someone can find a reliable source, the article could easily be improved
48:. No consensus simply to give Joe some time to work on it. If its not sourced in a month nudge me and I'll nuke it. Is that OK?
17:
546:--while we're discussing or perhaps postponing, will one of you remove that long list? That's advertising, it seems to me.
135:
Non-notable bootleg CD distributer. Article sourced entirely from a no-longer-there page on an anime-seller's website (not
373:
a bootleg company, just that their license is good for Taiwan-only sales). In any case, I still don't see notability.—
95:
90:
589:
99:
36:
588:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
381:
336:
258:
234:
207:
155:
82:
516:, a magazine (ISSN:1705-3692) that analyzes the "differences" between their products and the original CDs.
466:
438:
420:
315:
348:
295:
530:
274:
179:
362:
517:
492:
480:
458:
374:
366:
329:
251:
227:
200:
148:
86:
570:
555:
534:
496:
470:
448:
424:
403:
383:
352:
338:
319:
299:
278:
260:
236:
209:
183:
157:
64:
52:
509:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
551:
462:
433:
416:
343:
If this is the case, then maybe this article is a candidate for being built in userspace? -
311:
78:
70:
344:
291:
526:
512:: Out of the first hundred Google hits, I only found one reliable source—an article by
270:
175:
167:
140:
565:
521:
487:
412:
398:
136:
61:
49:
365:, and that was just a passing mention in a brief weekly anime column. Also dug up
116:
547:
328:, which is a commercial site. If the sub-domain wasn't then that's my mistake. —
144:
582:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
57:
No edits since this closed and no sources added. This is now
325:
123:
112:
108:
104:
369:, which seems to contradict the column—that SonMay is
290:
is, the nom did hit this one right on the head... -
221:
list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
592:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
194:list of Music-related deletion discussions
246:: This debate has been included in the
219:: This debate has been included in the
192:: This debate has been included in the
485:article can be brought to AFD again. --
324:I was going by the root of the site:
7:
248:list of video game related deletions
172:Knowledge:Notability (criminal acts)
269:: Per nominator and Gwen Gale. --
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
571:17:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
556:15:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
535:02:54, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
497:21:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
471:18:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
449:21:00, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
425:19:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
404:07:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
384:20:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
353:18:58, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
339:18:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
320:18:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
300:18:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
279:17:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
261:16:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
237:16:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
210:16:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
184:16:36, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
158:16:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
53:17:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
65:21:55, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
609:
359:Google News archive search
585:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
139:by a long shot). Fails
457:Putting this under
415:about his claims. —
461:would also work. —
44:The result was
510:bootleg recording
413:assume good faith
263:
239:
224:
212:
197:
600:
587:
568:
446:
441:
436:
401:
395:Berne Convention
379:
334:
256:
242:
232:
225:
215:
205:
198:
188:
153:
126:
120:
102:
46:postpose outcome
34:
608:
607:
603:
602:
601:
599:
598:
597:
596:
590:deletion review
583:
566:
444:
439:
434:
399:
375:
361:turned up only
330:
286:: As cliche as
252:
228:
201:
149:
122:
93:
77:
74:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
606:
604:
595:
594:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
559:
558:
538:
537:
499:
476:
475:
474:
473:
452:
451:
427:
406:
388:
387:
386:
377:Hello, Control
355:
341:
332:Hello, Control
303:
302:
281:
264:
254:Hello, Control
240:
230:Hello, Control
213:
203:Hello, Control
186:
166:Meets neither
151:Hello, Control
133:
132:
73:
68:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
605:
593:
591:
586:
580:
579:
572:
569:
563:
562:
561:
560:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
541:
540:
539:
536:
532:
528:
523:
518:
515:
511:
507:
503:
500:
498:
494:
490:
489:
483:
482:
478:
477:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
455:
454:
453:
450:
447:
442:
437:
431:
428:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
405:
402:
396:
392:
389:
385:
382:
380:
378:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
354:
350:
346:
342:
340:
337:
335:
333:
327:
326:anime.org.uk/
323:
322:
321:
317:
313:
308:
305:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
262:
259:
257:
255:
249:
245:
241:
238:
235:
233:
231:
222:
218:
214:
211:
208:
206:
204:
195:
191:
187:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
161:
160:
159:
156:
154:
152:
146:
142:
138:
130:
125:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
60:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
584:
581:
564:Whacked. ···
543:
513:
505:
501:
486:
479:
429:
408:
390:
376:
370:
331:
306:
287:
283:
266:
253:
243:
229:
216:
202:
189:
163:
150:
134:
58:
56:
45:
43:
31:
28:
514:ANIMEfringe
481:WP:POSTPONE
463:Quasirandom
459:WP:POSTPONE
417:Quasirandom
391:Strong Keep
363:one article
312:Dandy Sephy
345:Adolphus79
292:Adolphus79
527:Jappalang
307:Weak Keep
271:Goodraise
176:Gwen Gale
129:View log
430:Comment
288:Per Nom
168:WP:CORP
141:WP:CORP
96:protect
91:history
62:Spartaz
50:Spartaz
548:Drmies
522:WP:GNG
502:Userfy
284:Delete
267:Delete
164:Delete
124:delete
100:delete
79:SonMay
71:SonMay
59:Delete
508:into
506:Merge
488:Farix
137:WP:RS
127:) – (
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
552:talk
544:Note
531:talk
493:Talk
467:talk
445:1000
435:Dino
421:talk
409:Keep
367:this
349:talk
316:talk
296:talk
275:talk
244:Note
217:Note
190:Note
180:talk
170:nor
145:WP:V
143:and
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
567:日本穣
504:or
440:guy
400:日本穣
371:not
250:. —
223:.
196:.
147:. —
554:)
533:)
495:)
469:)
423:)
357:A
351:)
318:)
298:)
277:)
182:)
174:.
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
550:(
529:(
491:(
465:(
419:(
347:(
314:(
294:(
273:(
226:—
199:—
178:(
131:)
121:(
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.