732:"Before 1970, there was only one (university) in Paris, and its name was Sorbonne. The universities of the capital will then have to share it. This is roughly the agreement that could be found between the university presidents, AFTER AN ATTACK FROM THE CITY OF PARIS AND THE REGION. Both institutions HAD THREATENED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE WEEK TO REJECT THE MERGING BETWEEN PARIS 2, PARIS 4 AND PARIS 6, IF THEY TOOK OVER THE NAME SORBONNE". "But they can ALL include the word in their name", has reminded yesterday the Paris rectorat. "ALL of the universities of Paris are the inheritors (of Sorbonne)". THIS CONFLICT TAKES PLACE in the middle of the process of bringing closer together universities and grandes Ă©coles in Paris."
735:"Avant 1970, il n'en existait qu'une à Paris… et elle s'appelait Sorbonne. Les universités de la capitale vont donc devoir le partager. C'est à peu près cet accord qui a pu être trouvé entre les présidents d'université, à la suite d'une attaque de la Ville de Paris et de la région. Les deux institutions avaient menacé en début de semaine de refuser l'union entre Paris-II, Paris-IV et Paris-VI, si ces dernières s'appropriaient le nom de Sorbonne. « Mais toutes peuvent inclure dans leur nom le mot Sorbonne, a rappelé hier le rectorat de Paris. Toutes les universités de Paris en sont héritières. » Ce conflit intervient en pleine période de rapprochement des universités et grandes écoles parisiennes à Paris."
743:"By that time, no one has yet registered the simple expression "La Sorbonne". In november 2007 it's done by Paris 4, and this in a record of 22 (intellectual property) classes, wich blocks its exploitation in every possible area. Then Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne gets irritated at last, offended by the implantation of its rival Paris 4 at Abu Dhabi. As a worthy law faculty, it registers 13 trademarks all of a sudden" The next episode of the saga? A "RAG AND BONE MEN" FIGHT, that has started, to know who will really have the right to use the brand that is now claimed not only by four or five universities, but also by the PRES wanting to get the precious label "excellency campus"".
671:"Mais la plus remontée était probablement la ville de Paris. Propriétaire du bâtiment de la Sorbonne et de la marque Paris-Sorbonne, elle a dénoncé le coup de force. Soutenue par la région Ile-de-France, elle a alors menacé de ne pas voter les statuts d’un Pres qui voulait accaparer un nom-symbole de la capitale, l’héritage commun de tous les Parisiens. Tout s’est finalement bien terminé. Les trois présidents ont tempéré : ils ont baptisé leur Pres «Sorbonne universités», ce qui a satisfait tout le monde. Car si personne ne peut s’approprier le mot seul «Sorbonne», chacun peut l’inclure dans son nom.
707:"On their side, the universities Paris 2, Paris 4 and Paris 6 have registered the statutes of an association governed by the law of 1901, named "La Sorbonne", WHICH HAS TRIGGERED AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF PROTESTATION BY THE OTHER THREE UNIVERSITIES OPERATING IN THE SORBONNE BUILDING, AND A LETTER FROM THE CITY OF PARIS DEMANDING TO THE UNIVERSITIES "IN THE NAME OF THE MAYOR OF PARIS, TO USE THE NAME "SORBONNE" IN A CONCERTED WAY AMONG INSTITUTIONS AND WITH OUR AGREEMENT AS OWNER OF THE BUILDING", AND A LETTER FROM THE RECTOR OF THE ACADEMY OF PARIS IN THE SAME DIRECTION".
710:"De leur côté, les universités Paris 2, Paris 4 et Paris 6 ont déposé les statuts d’une Association régie par la loi de 1901 nommée « La Sorbonne », ce qui a provoqué un communiqué de protestation des trois autres universités occupant des locaux en Sorbonne, et une lettre de la Ville de Paris demandant aux universités « au nom du Maire de Paris, d’utiliser le nom « Sorbonne » de manière concertée entre établissements et avec notre accord de propriétaire du bâtiment », et une lettre du recteur de l’académie de Paris allant dans le même sens."
682:"But the guns were not yet put away" The Minister of Higher education "SHARPLY REMINDS" to the President of Paris 2, (then) member of Sorbonne Universités and right after he describes the estate projects of Sorbonne Universités, that Sorbonne (the single word) is not a trademark and ALL parisian merger projects can take that name, to the delight of the president of Paris 1 "Despite the OBVIOUS TENSION, parisian universities can see life with optimism "
685:"Mais les flingues n’étaient pas pour autant rangés. Quelques minutes plus tard, après la présentation de Louis Vogel, président de Paris-II, des projets immobiliers de Sorbonne universités, la ministre a rappelé sèchement à l’intéressé, devant un Jean-Claude Colliard, président de Paris-I Panthéon-Sorbonne, aux anges, que « le mot « Sorbonne » n’est pas une marque déposée et que tous les regroupements parisiens peuvent prendre ce nom… »
699:"Enfin, les trois universités ont choisi d’appeler le PRES « La Sorbonne » et continuent de communiquer en utilisant ce nom, alors même que ce choix a provoqué de vives protestations de plusieurs autres universités et que l’État et la Ville de Paris (propriétaire du bâtiment Sorbonne) ont exprimé par écrit leur désaccord avec ce choix. "
696:"The three Universities have chosen to name the PRES "La Sorbonne" and continue to communicate using that name, EVEN THOUGH THIS CHOICE HAS TRIGGERED FIERCE PROTESTS FROM SEVERAL OTHER UNIVERSITIES AND THAT THE STATE AND THE CITY OF PARIS (OWNERS OF THE SORBONNE BUILDING) HAVE EXPRESSED IN WRITING THEIR DISAGREEMENT WITH THIS CHOICE."
789:
briefly to the suggested merge target. As far as I can make out this is essentially about a trademark dispute as to which successor university should be entitled to use the name "Sorbonne". That issue may well deserve a paragraph in the merge target, but does not deserve an article of its own. WP
749:
Là , la prestigieuse Paris-1 Panthéon
Sorbonne s'énerve enfin, ulcérée par l'implantation de sa rivale Paris IV à Abu Dhabi . En digne juriste, elle dépose 13 marques d'un coup Le prochain épisode du feuilleton ? Une bataille de chiffonniers, qui a démarré, pour savoir qui aura vraiment le droit
607:
I've added references to blogs of the french newspaper Le Monde (the one that specializes in
University stories) and the french magazine NouvelObs. They give an idea of how the story was being portrayed in the press at the time. I have also added the Larrouturou report to the French Minister of
667:
The city of Paris, "the most offended", denounces the "ARMED TAKEOVER" (of the name). Supported by the Ile de France region, it then THREATENED TO NOT VOTE THE STATUTES OF A PRES WANTING TO HIJACK A NAME-SYMBOL OF THE CAPITAL, COMMON HERITAGE OF ALL PARISIANS "THE CONTROVERSY ILLUSTRATES the
790:
expects NPOV. It should set out briefly the arguments on each side and when there us an outcome what it is. WP should not be a forum for arguing out which side is right. An article with this number of citations (if they are relevant) is certainly not "original research".
721:"La Ville de Paris et la région Ile-de-France viennent ainsi de menacer de ne pas voter les statuts du nouveau pôle regroupant trois universités parisiennes si elles s’obstinaient à vouloir l’appeler Sorbonne. Un compromis a été trouvé in extremis."
390:
746:"A ce stade, personne n'a encore protégé l'expression toute simple « La Sorbonne ». En novembre 2007 c'est fait par Paris IV, et ceci dans un nouveau record de 22 classes, ce qui vérouille l'exploitation dans tous les secteurs possibles.
718:"The city of Paris and the Ile de France region have just THREATENED TO NOT VOTE the statutes of the new PRES gathering three parisian universities IF THEY PERSIST IN WANTING TO NAME IT SORBONNE. A compromise was found in extremis."
490:
that the subject is notable, as
Knowledge defines notability. If they do not meet these criteria, it doesn't matter how many they are. In any case, generally more than one source is demanded, but too many are considered
165:
296:
There are multiple reputable and verifiable sources pointing to official legal documents and trademark registration notices, as well as to published articles in french well established and reputable newspapers.
196:
Complete original research. There are plenty of sources, but none except one short article is dealing with a dispute about the name
Sorbonne. This is more like a blog article by a user. --
643:
I invite you to read again. The full references are verifiable by anyone (in French). I include below the relevant quotes and an
English summary. I add the capital letters for clarity.
763:
458:, I reformulated my text. There are plenty of sources, but none except one short article is dealing with a dispute about the name Sorbonne. It is complete original research. --
159:
405:
400:
750:
d'utiliser la marque que revendiquent maintenant non seulement quatre ou cinq universités, mais aussi des PRES désireux de décrocher le précieux label "campus d'excellence"
256:
118:
236:
276:
410:
91:
86:
95:
125:
78:
513:
class of
Wikipedians. Nonetheless, I agree that 46 citations might be going too far! The article needs to be abbreviated to remove any
677:
180:
147:
17:
688:
Malgré la tension palpable, les universités parisiennes peuvent voir la vie un peu plus en rose pour les prochaines années. "
574:
623:
754:
Thanks. Some disagreement mentioned here and there does not mean there is a major dispute as this article leads to think. --
678:
2. Newspaper Le Monde's blog on universities: "Valérie Pécresse, "mère fouettard" des présidents d'université parisiens"
141:
799:
777:
652:
638:
617:
602:
586:
560:
538:
504:
467:
446:
427:
375:
342:
327:
305:
288:
268:
248:
227:
205:
60:
82:
573:
There are three press articles (two from Libération and one from
Nouvelobs). I've added a fourth from LeParisien (
137:
816:
773:
648:
613:
598:
582:
338:
301:
284:
264:
244:
40:
423:
223:
187:
795:
769:
644:
609:
594:
578:
544:
334:
315:
297:
812:
74:
66:
36:
556:
534:
442:
280:
260:
240:
739:
7. Magazine Le Nouvel Obs' blog on education: "bataille de chiffoniers autour de la marque
Sorbonne"
510:
500:
419:
371:
355:
333:
It would be great if as much people as possible get involved into deciding the fate of the article.
323:
219:
215:
173:
153:
53:
738:
791:
759:
634:
492:
463:
201:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
811:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
575:
http://www.leparisien.fr/paris-75/la-marque-sorbonne-va-etre-partagee-27-02-2010-829973.php
552:
530:
518:
479:
455:
438:
437:
39 citations are not enough? Yes, some are duplicates, but still... Clean up and merge.
496:
367:
319:
608:
Higher education, that explicitly addresses the conflict (in page 12 and annex 11.2).
755:
630:
459:
197:
514:
483:
391:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sorbonne Law School (Ecole de Droit de la
Sorbonne)
57:
318:
is the creator of the article and has contributed mostly on this subject so far. -
112:
551:, which hilariously has a banner that it requires more sources for verification.
526:
522:
487:
359:
629:. The other ones are only talking about a sharing, or are simple references. --
521:, then merged. As a section in an article, the topic would not need to satisfy
703:
4. Larrouturou report to the french
Minister of Higher Education (annex 11.2)
525:
to the same extent as a standalone article. Blind Freddy can see it passes
692:
3. Larrouturou report to the french Minister of Higher Education (page 12)
548:
674:
La polémique illustre la confusion du paysage universitaire parisien"
478:
The existence of citations alone does not translate into inclusion,
728:
6. Newspaper Le Parisien : "La marque Sorbonne va être partagée"
714:
5. Newspaper Libération : "Les facs s'arrachent le nom Sorbonne"
807:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
383:
These are the Sorbonne-related articles nominated for deletion:
663:
1. Libération newspaper: "La Sorbonne, marque déposée ?
108:
104:
100:
172:
396:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sorbonne name dispute
406:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sorbonne Art School
401:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Sorbonne Publishing
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
819:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:Note: This discussion has been included in the
235:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:list of Education-related deletion discussions
713:
668:confusion of parisian university landscape".
186:
8:
622:In all the sources of the article, only one
237:list of History-related deletion discussions
277:list of France-related deletion discussions
274:
254:
234:
411:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/IAE Paris
7:
768:You're entitled to your own opinion.
216:University of Paris#1970: Division
54:University of Paris#1970: Division
24:
593:Merging into Sorbonne sounds ok.
547:that this should be merged with
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
358:on account of subject lacking
1:
218:and improve section there.
836:
482:. The sources have to be
809:Please do not modify it.
800:17:20, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
778:07:50, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
764:17:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
653:11:03, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
639:08:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
618:18:15, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
603:16:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
587:16:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
561:11:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
539:22:28, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
505:11:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
468:08:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
447:01:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
428:11:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
376:09:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
343:11:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
328:09:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
306:07:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
289:20:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
269:20:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
249:20:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
228:18:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
206:08:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
61:04:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
75:Sorbonne name dispute
67:Sorbonne name dispute
56:. S elective merge.
625:is talking about a
486:, and they have to
366:, per nomination. -
356:University of Paris
488:support the notion
330:
291:
271:
251:
827:
509:I'm more of the
314:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
34:
835:
834:
830:
829:
828:
826:
825:
824:
823:
817:deletion review
770:MapcheckerParis
741:
730:
716:
705:
694:
680:
665:
645:MapcheckerParis
610:MapcheckerParis
595:MapcheckerParis
579:MapcheckerParis
545:MapcheckerParis
335:MapcheckerParis
316:MapcheckerParis
298:MapcheckerParis
281:The Mighty Glen
261:The Mighty Glen
241:The Mighty Glen
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
833:
831:
822:
821:
803:
802:
783:
782:
781:
780:
740:
737:
729:
726:
724:
715:
712:
704:
701:
693:
690:
679:
676:
664:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
605:
590:
589:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
473:
472:
471:
470:
450:
449:
431:
430:
420:Anna Frodesiak
416:
415:
414:
413:
408:
403:
398:
393:
385:
384:
378:
348:
347:
346:
345:
331:
309:
308:
293:
292:
272:
252:
231:
230:
220:Chicbyaccident
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
832:
820:
818:
814:
810:
805:
804:
801:
797:
793:
792:Peterkingiron
788:
785:
784:
779:
775:
771:
767:
766:
765:
761:
757:
753:
752:
751:
747:
744:
736:
733:
727:
725:
722:
719:
711:
708:
702:
700:
697:
691:
689:
686:
683:
675:
672:
669:
662:
654:
650:
646:
642:
641:
640:
636:
632:
628:
624:
621:
620:
619:
615:
611:
606:
604:
600:
596:
592:
591:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
571:
562:
558:
554:
553:Jack N. Stock
550:
546:
543:I agree with
542:
541:
540:
536:
532:
531:Jack N. Stock
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
507:
506:
502:
498:
494:
489:
485:
481:
480:Jack N. Stock
477:
476:
475:
474:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:Jack N. Stock
454:
453:
452:
451:
448:
444:
440:
439:Jack N. Stock
436:
433:
432:
429:
425:
421:
418:
417:
412:
409:
407:
404:
402:
399:
397:
394:
392:
389:
388:
387:
386:
382:
379:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:. Otherwise,
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
209:
208:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
808:
806:
786:
748:
745:
742:
734:
731:
723:
720:
717:
709:
706:
698:
695:
687:
684:
681:
673:
670:
666:
626:
517:and resolve
511:WP:UNDERKILL
434:
395:
380:
363:
360:significance
351:
211:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
49:
47:
31:
28:
160:free images
813:talk page
497:The Gnome
368:The Gnome
320:The Gnome
37:talk page
815:or in a
756:Xuo Tran
631:Xuo Tran
549:Sorbonne
519:WP:UNDUE
493:overkill
484:reliable
460:Xuo Tran
198:Xuo Tran
119:View log
39:or in a
627:dispute
381:Comment
166:WPÂ refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
58:Spartaz
364:Delete
138:Google
96:delete
787:Merge
515:WP:OR
435:Merge
354:into
352:Merge
214:with
212:Merge
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
50:merge
16:<
796:talk
774:talk
760:talk
649:talk
635:talk
614:talk
599:talk
583:talk
557:talk
535:talk
527:WP:V
523:WP:N
501:talk
464:talk
443:talk
424:talk
372:talk
339:talk
324:talk
302:talk
285:talk
265:talk
245:talk
224:talk
202:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
577:).
529:.
495:. -
188:TWL
117:– (
52:to
798:)
776:)
762:)
651:)
637:)
616:)
601:)
585:)
559:)
537:)
503:)
466:)
445:)
426:)
374:)
341:)
326:)
304:)
287:)
279:.
267:)
259:.
247:)
239:.
226:)
204:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
794:(
772:(
758:(
647:(
633:(
612:(
597:(
581:(
555:(
533:(
499:(
462:(
441:(
422:(
370:(
337:(
322:(
300:(
283:(
263:(
243:(
222:(
200:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.