175:
There is very little information available on the game itself - particularly from sources I'd describe as reliable - and the article as it stands consists of minute descriptions of the game's various playable characters (against the guidelines for articles on video games), based presumably on the
171:
Sorry - this is my first nomination for deletion, so my explanation there may have been a little brief. In a nutshell, this article covers a videogame which certainly wasn't notable in its own sphere, generating only a couple of poor reviews on industry websites such as IGN.com and
Gamespot.
176:
editors' own experiences (they certainly can't be verified). Although this could be corrected, it would involve deleting 95% of the article and I'm not sure what it could be replaced with.
244:
which pretty much knocks my main concern (notability) on the head. Is there a mechanism by which I can withdraw this nomination for deletion, or does it have to run its course now?
125:
215:
240:
I understand the concept of notability, but hadn't appreciated
Gamespot etc would be considered reliable sources. So, thanks for pointing me in the direction of
152:
17:
92:
87:
96:
79:
207:
268:
36:
267:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
249:
181:
137:
253:
235:
185:
164:
141:
61:
245:
177:
133:
160:
83:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
241:
223:
231:
199:
49:
57:
195:
211:
156:
75:
67:
52:
criterion 1—nom withdrawn with no "delete" opinions registered. Non-admin closure.
113:
227:
203:
219:
53:
226:. The article is in a horrible shape but AfD isn't the place for cleanup.
222:
amalgamates a , of which several from sources fully acceptable under the
261:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
109:
105:
101:
198:
with fame or importance. There are certainly enough
194:. The nomination appears to confuse the concept of
132:Notability and inability to find reliable sources
214:'s initial contribution to the project which was
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
271:). No further edits should be made to this page.
153:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
151:: This debate has been included in the
242:Wikiproject Video Games' sources list
224:Wikiproject Video Games' sources list
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
202:justifying an article, including a
24:
1:
210:assorted with a kerkuffle on
288:
254:16:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
236:16:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
192:Keep & tag for cleanup
186:16:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
165:16:25, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
142:16:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
62:17:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
264:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
218:, last but not least,
208:preview on gamespot
204:review on gamezone
44:The result was
167:
279:
266:
200:reliable sources
147:
123:
117:
99:
34:
287:
286:
282:
281:
280:
278:
277:
276:
275:
269:deletion review
262:
216:later withdrawn
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
285:
283:
274:
273:
257:
256:
238:
169:
168:
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
284:
272:
270:
265:
259:
258:
255:
251:
247:
246:Letsplaydrums
243:
239:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:Ozzy Osbourne
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
190:
189:
188:
187:
183:
179:
178:Letsplaydrums
173:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
145:
144:
143:
139:
135:
134:Letsplaydrums
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
263:
260:
191:
174:
170:
148:
131:
76:Savage Skies
68:Savage Skies
45:
43:
31:
28:
46:speedy keep
220:Metacritic
196:notability
126:View log
157:MrKIA11
93:protect
88:history
228:MLauba
121:delete
97:delete
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
50:WP:SK
16:<
250:talk
232:talk
206:, a
182:talk
161:talk
149:Note
138:talk
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
54:Deor
48:per
252:)
234:)
184:)
163:)
155:.
140:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
248:(
230:(
180:(
159:(
136:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.