135:
I should add, vanity term by Mr. Saber (who is the article's author and has added two vanity links to the article), only 37 Google hits, and so-called "sources" are not peer-reviewed, they're just places he convinced to add some text about his neologism.
209:- Vanity, self-promotion, citing own website, neologism. Claimed recently discovered, but if the effect discussed is real, it is likely to have another name as lunar observation has occurred for hundreds of years. --
118:
150:
140:
131:
91:
86:
17:
95:
263:
256:
245:
213:
201:
188:
174:
163:
78:
170:
Does it bother you it's vanity by Mr. Saber, including two links to articles about himself and not the so-called phenomenon?
279:
36:
278:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
126:
82:
260:
197:
74:
65:
252:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
238:
210:
160:
185:
171:
147:
137:
128:
112:
226:
242:
54:
144:
The evidence just keeps rolling in. Look at what he posted on my talk page.
184:. Patent vanity. If it is notable, someone else will write it up. --
272:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
234:
241:. A good scientific term but no need to list independently.
145:
108:
104:
100:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
159:article is sourced, not identical to former afd --
282:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
64:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
257:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (science)
251:This discussion has been added as a
24:
1:
264:06:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
246:19:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
214:16:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
202:12:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
189:11:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
175:11:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
164:11:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
151:11:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
141:11:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
132:10:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
299:
255:to the proposed guideline
275:Please do not modify it.
125:Delete per previous afd
32:Please do not modify it.
237:-related topics, per
266:
59:
58:2007-02-08 22:00Z
290:
277:
250:
116:
98:
68:(2nd nomination)
61:
57:
50:
34:
298:
297:
293:
292:
291:
289:
288:
287:
286:
280:deletion review
273:
261:trialsanderrors
89:
73:
70:
51:
45:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
296:
294:
285:
284:
268:
267:
248:
216:
204:
191:
178:
177:
167:
166:
143:
134:
123:
122:
69:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
295:
283:
281:
276:
270:
269:
265:
262:
258:
254:
249:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
217:
215:
212:
208:
205:
203:
199:
195:
192:
190:
187:
183:
180:
179:
176:
173:
169:
168:
165:
162:
158:
155:
154:
153:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
133:
130:
127:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:Saber's Beads
72:
71:
67:
66:Saber's Beads
62:
60:
56:
48:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
274:
271:
230:
222:
218:
206:
193:
181:
156:
124:
52:
46:
43:
31:
28:
239:WP:NOT#DICT
227:wikitionary
253:test case
233:to other
211:Dual Freq
161:Robdurbar
157:weak keep
231:Redirect
223:Transfer
186:RHaworth
172:Nardman1
148:Nardman1
138:Nardman1
129:Nardman1
119:View log
196:vanity
92:protect
87:history
219:Delete
207:Delete
194:Delete
182:Delete
96:delete
47:Delete
243:Wooyi
229:, or
198:Tuvok
113:views
105:watch
101:links
55:Quarl
16:<
259:. ~
235:moon
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
225:to
117:– (
221:,
200:^
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
121:)
115:)
77:(
53:—
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.