349:. If there are significant sources when the project finishes, you can re-create the article, although I doubt that will be possible because EU research projects like this one are hardly ever notable. Their results may be notable and the persons/companies/organizations involved, but not the projects themselves, of which there are thirteen to a dozen. --
384:
Don't worry, my "bias" is not just against EU projects, but almost any research project, be it EU, NSF, NIH, or other. It just happens so that EU projects seem to be the only ones for which people think they have to create articles. And I didn't say "never notable", I said "hardly ever", there may be
605:
Just a remark: Since
Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia for all (including the researcher), it could be interesting to have at least the definition of the project. It happens in my every day life that I am told about old projects which are of interest for me. Then if those projects are not active
367:
applicable for mass deployment and application in terms of technology. The more time I was suggesting was to address what has been written so far in WP as it is not reflecting the notable work undertaken by the project. The project has strong links and involvement with the UN's ITU, NEARCTIS, etc.
264:
Regarding the notability of the project, the companies involved in it and their key presence in the ITS sector makes it interesting to keep a page on SafeTRIP and its main results. About the previous remark of it being of "ephemeral" nature, the SafeTRIP project will last for 3-4 years, and will
403:
WP highly helps in highlighting the R&D activities sponsorised by the SafeTRIP project in the domain of the communication technology and ITS, ensuring visibility to other researchers and stakeholders, and therefore leading to further improvements and exploitation of the results beyond the
366:
You seem to hold a unhealthy bias towards EU projects (like this? what do you mean like this?) not ever being notable - which is a dangerous and unfair generic opinion. The project is already notable for being the only one to exploit a S-band satellite technology for vehicle that is readily
265:
encourage a wide developer base to contribute software for the open platform being put in place, during the project execution and afterwards. Finally, the wiki has also been improved by including references to relevant publications and linking it to other pages.
226:
This project describes the use of a new satellite bandwidth which is of interest to the consumer and research audience in the road transport area. As the project is relatively new, perhaps more time can be allowed for contributors to add to it.
152:
204:
324:
113:
606:
anymore, they could have stop their website and I am happy when I can find out some informations about them on wikipedia which is my first reference for verified informations.
245:
What you are implying is that at this moment there is not enough that makes the subject notable, but it will be at some point in the future, if all goes as hoped for. However,
505:
says that editors have better things to do than debate, delete then recreate articles. We can afford to wait a few months or a year even and see how this develops. --
301:
146:
607:
287:
291:
17:
52:
86:
81:
649:
167:
36:
372:
232:
90:
134:
622:
73:
346:
648:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
283:
270:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
611:
584:
368:
228:
531:
246:
128:
279:
266:
183:
Non-notable ephemeral project. No significant independent sources covering the project, does not meet
215:
124:
49:
634:
615:
599:
567:
543:
514:
489:
460:
435:
413:
405:
394:
376:
358:
339:
316:
274:
258:
236:
219:
196:
160:
77:
55:
587:. Yes, the only way this is going to be kept is if official policy is scrapped. Knowledge (XXG)
502:
470:
451:
article if the project outcome becomes a real world application with the
Eutelsat W2A satellite.
409:
174:
485:
335:
312:
69:
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
580:
630:
596:
539:
431:
390:
354:
254:
192:
588:
527:
423:
184:
456:
211:
563:
510:
140:
481:
331:
308:
107:
626:
592:
535:
427:
386:
350:
250:
188:
452:
447:
without prejudice to future re-creation or incorporation of material into the
473:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
559:
506:
625:... However, the EU has databases for projects like this one, I assume. --
448:
642:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
558:
is to put official policy on the back burner for a while. --
103:
99:
95:
591:
for dozens of inconsequential EU research projects. -
159:
385:
exceptions, although i have yet to encounter them. --
579:. Yet another EU research project, described with
480:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
205:
173:
325:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
652:). No further edits should be made to this page.
554:What I'm suggesting is that the best solution
8:
323:Note: This debate has been included in the
300:Note: This debate has been included in the
203:Note: This debate has been included in the
302:list of Europe-related deletion discussions
322:
299:
202:
501:Policy may say we should delete this but
621:I see you problem, unfortunately, WP
526:I guess this is a proposal to delete
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
597:killing the human spirit since 2003!
24:
404:duration of the EU project. --
1:
426:, however lofty the goal. --
635:15:16, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
616:15:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
600:14:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
568:01:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
544:09:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
515:23:01, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
490:11:32, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
461:20:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
436:14:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
414:14:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
395:17:33, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
377:17:02, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
359:14:16, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
340:00:53, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
317:00:53, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
275:11:45, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
259:17:20, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
237:17:16, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
220:10:54, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
197:10:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
56:23:46, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
669:
424:WP is not for advertising
645:Please do not modify it.
247:WP is not a crystal ball
32:Please do not modify it.
589:is not a free web host
292:few or no other edits
581:unrealistic optimism
294:outside this topic.
623:is not a directory
532:not a crystal ball
44:The result was
492:
369:Ashweeni Beeharee
342:
328:
319:
305:
295:
229:Ashweeni Beeharee
222:
208:
660:
647:
583:about what they
556:for this article
479:
475:
347:is not inherited
329:
306:
277:
209:
178:
177:
163:
111:
93:
34:
668:
667:
663:
662:
661:
659:
658:
657:
656:
650:deletion review
643:
593:Smerdis of Tlön
585:hope to achieve
468:
120:
84:
68:
65:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
666:
664:
655:
654:
638:
637:
608:194.214.173.64
603:
602:
573:
572:
571:
570:
549:
548:
547:
546:
518:
517:
495:
494:
493:
477:
476:
465:
464:
463:
441:
440:
439:
438:
422:Probably, but
417:
416:
400:
399:
398:
397:
364:
363:
362:
361:
320:
280:Guillermo Grau
267:Guillermo Grau
262:
261:
224:
223:
181:
180:
117:
64:
59:
50:Black Kite (t)
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
665:
653:
651:
646:
640:
639:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
619:
618:
617:
613:
609:
601:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
575:
574:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
552:
551:
550:
545:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
522:
521:
520:
519:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
497:
496:
491:
487:
483:
478:
474:
472:
467:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
442:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
415:
411:
407:
402:
401:
396:
392:
388:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:
341:
337:
333:
326:
321:
318:
314:
310:
303:
298:
297:
296:
293:
289:
285:
281:
276:
272:
268:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
241:
240:
239:
238:
234:
230:
221:
217:
213:
206:
201:
200:
199:
198:
194:
190:
186:
176:
172:
169:
166:
162:
158:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
126:
123:
122:Find sources:
118:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
644:
641:
604:
576:
555:
523:
503:common sense
498:
469:
444:
365:
263:
242:
225:
182:
170:
164:
156:
149:
143:
137:
131:
121:
45:
43:
31:
28:
345:Notability
290:) has made
147:free images
212:Tom Morris
332:• Gene93k
309:• Gene93k
530:? WP is
471:Relisted
449:W Series
406:Robecamp
288:contribs
114:View log
70:SafeTRIP
62:SafeTRIP
524:Comment
482:BusterD
243:Comment
153:WP refs
141:scholar
87:protect
82:history
627:Crusio
577:Delete
536:Crusio
528:WP:AFD
445:Delete
428:Crusio
387:Crusio
351:Crusio
251:Crusio
189:Crusio
185:WP:GNG
125:Google
91:delete
46:delete
453:AllyD
168:JSTOR
129:books
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
631:talk
612:talk
564:talk
560:Kvng
540:talk
534:. --
511:talk
507:Kvng
499:Keep
486:talk
457:talk
432:talk
410:talk
391:talk
373:talk
355:talk
336:talk
313:talk
284:talk
271:talk
255:talk
249:. --
233:talk
216:talk
193:talk
161:FENS
135:news
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
175:TWL
112:– (
53:(c)
633:)
614:)
595:-
566:)
542:)
513:)
488:)
459:)
434:)
412:)
393:)
375:)
357:)
338:)
330:—
327:.
315:)
307:—
304:.
286:•
278:—
273:)
257:)
235:)
218:)
207:.
195:)
187:.
155:)
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
48:.
629:(
610:(
562:(
538:(
509:(
484:(
455:(
430:(
408:(
389:(
371:(
353:(
334:(
311:(
282:(
269:(
253:(
231:(
214:(
210:—
191:(
179:)
171:·
165:·
157:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
132:·
127:(
119:(
116:)
110:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.