Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Saliwahan Sikarwar - Knowledge

Source 📝

238:
Tagged for WP India. I've seen several times in the past that articles about some of the less urban areas of India start out like this, with more emphasis on historical or legendary events that occurred at the location. I do understand that it can look like random statements to those of us who don't
128:
I'm really not sure what this page is about. It just seems to ba ramblings about two villages in india which have nothing to do with the subject matter. This might be CSD-able as patent nonsense, but I'm bringing this here in the case that someone can de-crap-ify this article and make it
289:
to Bhagwanpur: Saliwahan Sikarwar does not seem to be notable enough for a separate article, anyway he is mentioned in Sikarwar page. Also information on Chainpur should be removed. Its a different place. It seems that the guy who started this article simply by copying from
269: 268:" article shows that Saliwahan Sikarwar was a ruler of the district. I have added this. However I couldn't find any reliable sources. I have added a request for comments at 121: 182: 207: 88: 83: 209: 132: 92: 75: 211: 217:
as a start and bringing it to the attention of Wikiproject India. It is tagged for improvement. There is already an article on
17: 239:
have prior knowledge of the tradition from which they arise. Once tagged they tend to be brought into normal standards.
249: 363: 138: 36: 348: 323: 303: 281: 256: 230: 197: 172: 146: 57: 362:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
79: 312: 53: 71: 63: 226: 193: 168: 135: 344: 299: 155:
I just ran a couple of Google searches and kept coming back to this article. Obvious problems with
336: 265: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
245: 206:
Not sure what Saliwahan Sikarwar is (a person?) but the village of Bhagwanpur seems to exist
222: 218: 189: 164: 340: 295: 141: 277: 156: 109: 240: 160: 49: 273: 291: 356:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
221:
so the text about this place in the article could be removed. --
311:-clearly this information should not be in the same article 116: 105: 101: 97: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 366:). No further edits should be made to this page. 335:: It has a place in Category-Villages_in_Bihar 8: 213:. I suggest moving the article to the title 183:list of India-related deletion discussions 294:did not understand what he was doing. -- 181:: This debate has been included in the 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 58:13:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 349:21:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 324:12:32, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 304:08:50, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 282:07:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 257:21:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 231:20:29, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 198:20:04, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 173:19:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 147:19:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 383: 129:understandable. --I'm an 359:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 72:Saliwahan Sikarwar 64:Saliwahan Sikarwar 44:The result was 337:Villages_in_Bihar 270:WikiProject India 254: 252:So let it be done 247: 215:Bhagwanpur, Bihar 200: 186: 374: 361: 321: 320: 250: 246: 187: 177: 119: 113: 95: 34: 382: 381: 377: 376: 375: 373: 372: 371: 370: 364:deletion review 357: 314: 313: 309:Delete or split 253: 219:Chainpur, India 115: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 380: 378: 369: 368: 352: 351: 326: 306: 284: 259: 251: 233: 201: 175: 126: 125: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 379: 367: 365: 360: 354: 353: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 325: 322: 319: 318: 310: 307: 305: 301: 297: 293: 288: 285: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 260: 258: 255: 248: 244: 243: 237: 234: 232: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 210: 208: 205: 202: 199: 195: 191: 184: 180: 176: 174: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 151: 150: 149: 148: 145: 144: 143: 140: 137: 134: 123: 118: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 358: 355: 332: 328: 317:The Bald One 316: 315: 308: 286: 261: 241: 235: 214: 203: 178: 152: 131: 130: 127: 45: 43: 31: 28: 223:Malcolmxl5 190:Malcolmxl5 165:Ecoleetage 341:Manoj nav 296:GDibyendu 266:Sikarwar 204:Comment: 122:View log 264:. The " 236:Comment 89:protect 84:history 262:Delete 242:Xymmax 153:Delete 133:Editor 117:delete 93:delete 50:Stifle 46:Delete 157:WP:RS 120:) – ( 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 345:talk 333:Keep 331:and 329:Edit 300:talk 292:here 287:Move 278:talk 227:talk 194:talk 179:Note 169:talk 161:WP:V 159:and 142:wiki 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 274:Axl 185:. 139:the 347:) 339:. 302:) 280:) 272:. 229:) 196:) 171:) 163:. 136:of 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 48:. 343:( 298:( 276:( 225:( 192:( 188:— 167:( 124:) 114:( 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Stifle
talk
13:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Saliwahan Sikarwar
Saliwahan Sikarwar
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Editor
of
the
wiki
19:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:RS
WP:V
Ecoleetage
talk
19:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
list of India-related deletion discussions
Malcolmxl5

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.