168:.) The article makes clear that it is asserting that this is a term, not just a concept: "Same-sex marriage (or "same-sex unions) in flux" is a term that describes a form of same-sex union"; "The term "in flux" helps other users and readers diaffentirerate between a country or region that has already ruled in favor of legalizing such unions." Also, the article is unsourced and only ever cited to another Knowledge (XXG) article. We already have both
265:
until sources are cited. Even giving the benefit of the doubt that this isn't a neologism, I'm having trouble understanding the fine points of what the article is trying to say--fine distinctions between "in flux" and "future legislation," what "accomodating" means, whether we're talking about just
287:) I'd be fine with userfication if the contributor requests. Otherwise, I'm afraid it might just delay the clean-up for later. I also need to note that, until this term is taken up by a community, I'm afraid that it may always be a
157:
152:
151:
doesn't suggest it is a widespread term, with (currently) 6 cumulative hits--two of which are to
Knowledge (XXG) and none of which are reliable sources. There are 0 hits for the term at google books (
189:- Arguably speedy as an attempt to communicate, since the promotion of the term is aimed at reader and users - implicitly, those of Knowledge (XXG) itself. In any case, this is a useless neologism.
148:
132:
160:
99:
94:
103:
154:
327:
300:
86:
166:
163:
62:
17:
266:
same-sex marriage or other legal unions, etc. As an editor, I need reliable sources before I can improve the article for clarity.
234:
144:
366:
346:
288:
275:
257:
241:
215:
198:
180:
68:
36:
292:
250:
335:
304:
271:
90:
299:
article, the only information here that does not relate to the neologism is "The most notable examples would be
365:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
82:
74:
211:
326:
at the latest." I don't know much about the topic, but this unsourced statement doesn't seem to mesh with
194:
140:
267:
173:
231:
343:
177:
52:
49:
319:
206:, original research and/or attempt to coin a new term. Exactly what Knowledge (XXG)'s not about.
190:
169:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
224:
338:, where it is sourced. If it needs to be merged, it might be better to merge it from
254:
120:
207:
295:, now that I've read that one. :) With respect to merging material into
312:
316:
342:
article, which is otherwise likely to remain on
Knowledge (XXG). --
308:
359:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
323:
127:
116:
112:
108:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
369:). No further edits should be made to this page.
249:all content not regarding the neologism into
8:
328:Recognition of same-sex unions in Ecuador
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
311:is not seemingly stalled as in
176:. This was a challenged PROD.
1:
253:, if it's not already there.
293:Status of same-sex marriage
251:Status of same-sex marriage
386:
336:Same-sex marriage in Nepal
330:. The 2010 date for Nepal
307:, though the situation in
69:01:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
347:11:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
276:05:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
258:03:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
242:17:55, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
216:14:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
199:13:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
181:10:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
145:Same-sex marriage in flux
362:Please do not modify it.
162:) and 0 at google news (
156:), 0 at google scholar (
32:Please do not modify it.
149:Same-sex unions in flux
83:Same-sex unions in flux
75:Same-sex unions in flux
174:Same-sex relationship
143:. A google search of
322:should be legal by
139:This seems to be a
320:same-sex marriages
44:The result was
286:
170:Same-sex marriage
377:
364:
285:To the last two.
284:
268:Matt Fitzpatrick
239:
229:
223:this neologism.—
130:
124:
106:
65:
60:
55:
34:
385:
384:
380:
379:
378:
376:
375:
374:
373:
367:deletion review
360:
238:
235:
225:
126:
97:
81:
78:
63:
58:
53:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
383:
381:
372:
371:
354:
352:
351:
350:
349:
344:Moonriddengirl
260:
244:
236:
218:
201:
178:Moonriddengirl
137:
136:
77:
72:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
382:
370:
368:
363:
357:
356:
355:
348:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
282:
279:
278:
277:
273:
269:
264:
261:
259:
256:
252:
248:
245:
243:
240:
232:
230:
228:
222:
219:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
153:
150:
146:
142:
134:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
105:
101:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
79:
76:
73:
71:
70:
66:
61:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
361:
358:
353:
339:
331:
315:, therefore
296:
280:
262:
246:
226:
220:
203:
191:AlexTiefling
186:
138:
45:
43:
31:
28:
334:covered by
227:S Marshall
141:neologism
255:Dcoetzee
133:View log
313:Ecuador
301:Ecuador
281:Comment
147:and of
100:protect
95:history
50:King of
317:Nepali
263:Userfy
221:Delete
208:Stifle
204:Delete
187:Delete
128:delete
104:delete
46:delete
309:Nepal
305:Nepal
247:Merge
131:) – (
121:views
113:watch
109:links
16:<
340:that
324:2010
303:and
297:that
289:fork
272:talk
237:Cont
212:talk
195:talk
172:and
117:logs
91:talk
87:edit
291:of
332:is
274:)
214:)
197:)
165:,
159:,
119:|
115:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
67:♠
48:.
283:(
270:(
233:/
210:(
193:(
135:)
125:(
123:)
85:(
64:♣
59:♦
54:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.