491:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
265:. Clearly not a G4, because the article now includes assertions of recent awards/nominations that some users argue show notability under WP:PORNBIO. The article raises multiple issues that can't be handled well in the context in which it's been nominated, and it would be better if the nomination was withdrawn and raised again, separately, when the current run has been disposed of,
496:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
495:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
224:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
182:
88:
83:
487:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
143:
213:
176:
78:
404:
384:
282:- Between her work as a frequent film critic and many awards through her modeling/starring there is little question she is a notable figure.
381:
116:
111:
120:
17:
514:
477:
460:
439:
419:
396:
366:
346:
324:
312:
291:
274:
257:
236:
61:
103:
468:- per incorrect nom. She was never a playmate to being with, so this nomination appears to be in error (part of a mass nom).--
270:
197:
164:
492:
529:
36:
266:
500:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
158:
528:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
456:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
154:
107:
503:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
204:
435:
287:
99:
67:
356:
300:
452:
190:
488:
448:
247:
510:
415:
392:
342:
308:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
170:
497:
431:
360:
318:
283:
251:
230:
498:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
470:
506:
411:
388:
335:
304:
50:
137:
229:
are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability criteria.
329:
Per "Has received nominations for well-known awards in multiple years." So,
522:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
351:
Two AVN nominations (one of them a collective nomination) and a
447:- per PORNBIO. Obvious nominator did not read the article
243:
133:
129:
125:
189:
89:
Articles for deletion/Sandee
Westgate (3rd nomination)
84:
Articles for deletion/Sandee
Westgate (2nd nomination)
203:
451:nominating considering subject is not a playmate.
244:previously deleted on the same grounds for 4 times
214:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
532:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
403:Note: This debate has been included in the
405:list of People-related deletion discussions
402:
355:F.A.M.E nomination. If this is enough for
380:Note: This debate has been added to the
76:
242:Please not that the same bio has been
79:Articles for deletion/Sandee Westgate
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:
24:
430:has multiple porn nominations.
1:
549:
420:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
397:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
367:13:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
359:, I'll have to concede. --
347:13:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
325:12:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
313:11:04, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
292:05:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
275:03:12, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
258:02:04, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
237:02:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
525:Please do not modify it.
225:solely related to their
32:Please do not modify it.
515:14:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
478:00:55, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
461:22:01, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
440:23:45, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
382:WikiProject Pornography
62:02:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
73:AfDs for this article:
267:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
218:Playmate of the Month
222:Playmate of the Year
493:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
505:
476:
422:
408:
385:list of deletions
364:
322:
255:
234:
540:
527:
501:
475:
409:
399:
362:
353:Favorite Breasts
338:
320:
253:
250:applies here. --
232:
208:
207:
193:
141:
123:
44:The result was
34:
548:
547:
543:
542:
541:
539:
538:
537:
536:
530:deletion review
523:
485:Procedural Keep
379:
336:
333:per the above.
216:. Being chosen
150:
114:
100:Sandee Westgate
98:
95:
93:
71:
68:Sandee Westgate
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
546:
544:
535:
534:
518:
517:
481:
480:
463:
453:Morbidthoughts
442:
424:
423:
400:
376:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
294:
277:
260:
211:
210:
147:
94:
92:
91:
86:
81:
75:
72:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
545:
533:
531:
526:
520:
519:
516:
512:
508:
504:
499:
494:
490:
486:
483:
482:
479:
473:
472:
467:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
425:
421:
417:
413:
406:
401:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
378:
377:
368:
365:
358:
354:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
339:
332:
328:
327:
326:
323:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
295:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
259:
256:
249:
245:
241:
240:
239:
238:
235:
228:
223:
219:
215:
206:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
156:
153:
152:Find sources:
148:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
58:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
524:
521:
502:
484:
469:
465:
444:
427:
352:
334:
330:
296:
279:
262:
227:playmatehood
226:
221:
217:
212:
200:
194:
186:
179:
173:
167:
161:
151:
55:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
177:free images
432:Dwanyewest
357:WP:PORNBIO
317:How so? --
301:WP:PORNBIO
284:BelloWello
489:WP:BEFORE
449:WP:BEFORE
412:• Gene93k
389:• Gene93k
248:WP:CSD_G4
471:Milowent
144:View log
507:Carrite
361:Damiens
337:Lugnuts
319:Damiens
305:Epbr123
299:Passes
263:Comment
252:Damiens
231:Damiens
183:WP refs
171:scholar
117:protect
112:history
51:postdlf
155:Google
121:delete
198:JSTOR
159:books
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
511:talk
466:Keep
457:talk
445:Keep
436:talk
428:Keep
416:talk
393:talk
343:talk
331:Keep
309:talk
297:Keep
288:talk
280:Keep
271:talk
191:FENS
165:news
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
57:talk
46:KEEP
363:.rf
321:.rf
254:.rf
233:.rf
220:or
205:TWL
142:– (
48:.
513:)
474:•
459:)
438:)
418:)
407:.
395:)
387:.
345:)
311:)
303:.
290:)
273:)
246:.
185:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
60:)
509:(
455:(
434:(
414:(
410:—
391:(
341:(
307:(
286:(
269:(
209:)
201:·
195:·
187:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
157:(
149:(
146:)
140:)
102:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.