Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Sanderson Beck - Knowledge

Source 📝

76:
I contacted the original author of the page to voice my concerns about this being a vanity page. I used the talk page to voice my concerns and ask someone to improve the article. I tagged the page saying it doesn't live up to notability standards. None of this lead to any improvements. So now I'm
116:
This may be the most bald-faced vanity I've yet seen on WP. Also I'm a graduate philosophy student, and I've never heard of this supposedly famous philosophy author. --
132:
There is no evidence of a notability check on the talk page, just an argument that it should be checked into, which it apparently hasn't. --
17: 190: 36: 189:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
175: 164: 150: 136: 120: 105: 85: 60: 78: 53: 66: 161: 82: 102: 57: 49: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
172: 147: 133: 95:
AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
117: 146:
She is well known and has produced many works. Apparently she is notable. --
183:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
81:
for reasons why this article appears to be a vanity article.
171:
Comment: Then copyedit the article so that it isn't. --
101:
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,
77:
nominating it for deletion. Please read the article
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 193:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 61:23:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 210: 176:15:04, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 165:12:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 160:Blatant vanity article. -- 151:11:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 137:10:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 121:08:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC) 106:16:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 86:13:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 186:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 108: 201: 188: 100: 96: 34: 209: 208: 204: 203: 202: 200: 199: 198: 197: 191:deletion review 184: 94: 79:discussion page 70: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 207: 205: 196: 195: 179: 178: 168: 167: 162:Pathlessdesert 154: 153: 140: 139: 124: 123: 110: 109: 99: 89: 88: 69: 67:Sanderson Beck 64: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 206: 194: 192: 187: 181: 180: 177: 174: 170: 169: 166: 163: 159: 156: 155: 152: 149: 145: 142: 141: 138: 135: 131: 130: 126: 125: 122: 119: 115: 112: 111: 107: 104: 103:Mailer Diablo 98: 97: 91: 90: 87: 84: 80: 75: 72: 71: 68: 65: 63: 62: 59: 56: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 185: 182: 157: 143: 128: 127: 113: 93: 92: 73: 52: 45: 43: 31: 28: 173:HResearcher 148:HResearcher 144:Strong keep 134:HResearcher 129:Weak delete 50:Mailer Dia 158:Delete 118:Ricaud 114:Delete 74:Delete 46:delete 83:Kelly 16:< 48:. - 58:lo 54:b

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Mailer Dia
b
lo
23:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Sanderson Beck
discussion page
Kelly
13:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Mailer Diablo
16:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Ricaud
08:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
HResearcher
10:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
HResearcher
11:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Pathlessdesert
12:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
HResearcher
15:04, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.