Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Sandra Navidi - Knowledge

Source 📝

451:(". . . may also work outside academia (e.g., in industry, financial sector, government, as a clinical physician, as a practicing lawyer, etc.) and their primary job does not have to be academic in nature . . ." and "the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area"). She has clearly been frequently interviewed on television etc. in her capacity as an expert. With the promotional elements removed, I think the encyclopedia benefits from having an article on this person; so I think there is a case for 424:(without prejudice for future). The subject of the article may very well meet Knowledge's notability criteria in the future, but does not appear to do so at present. The references which might appear to indicate notability are mainly brief mentions, for instance the reference to the usual acknowledgements in a book listing all the people the author would like to thank. This is mainly counter-productive; it would be easier to check notability if all the minor references and 555:
The only sourced notability claim is to appearing on Wall Street Warriors, a programme formerly broadcast on "Mojo HD". It seems she appeared in up to 6 episodes in 2006. The source given with the 2012 appearance is just a page with an embedded YouTube video. It's difficult to judge the reliability
617:
if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". I have these sources which are directly about Navidi. Here are three examples (taken from the External links
296:
because this person has been the subject of multiple third-party publications. The article still uses some sources which are financially tied to this article's subject, but I am satisfied that several good sources exist.
170: 345: 548:
She has been interviewed on ARD, ZDF,Westdeutscher Rundfunk (WDR), Bayrischer Rundfunk, n-tv, Arte TV, Deutsches Anlegerfernsehen, CNBC, Fox Business, CCTV China, Phoenix TV China and Voice of America
447:, in that the person has not obviously "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", I think there is borderline justification for applying 365: 236:
Article's content does not include items which meet Knowledge's notability criteria. The links are casual mentions of this person, and not content focused on this person.
123: 164: 644:
On the adjoining talk page I elaborated more fully on the specific concerns voiced by other Wikipedians on this page, and answered the concerns they've raised..
325: 130: 595: 528:
piece with the subject implicitly labelled as a self-promoter. Important notability claims remain unsourced in the article, for example:
96: 91: 670: 666: 100: 17: 556:
of these two German sources but there's certainly not significant coverage of the subject. The Career section is pure puffery.
83: 185: 152: 292:
have featured the subject of this article as the subject of their journalism. This coverage constitutes the meeting of
613:
I just reviewed the notability criteria for biographies. One acceptable criteria is that "A person is presumed to be
628: 714: 623: 40: 146: 636: 599: 542:
She frequently appears as an expert in international media outlets and as a guest speaker at various events.
525: 694: 653: 603: 584: 572: 516: 495: 464: 437: 407: 377: 357: 337: 312: 305: 276: 269: 258: 251: 244: 226: 142: 65: 710: 36: 683: 662: 658: 649: 645: 285: 210: 192: 53: 631: 222: 178: 61: 581: 567:. The academic claim above is not applicable, per the subject not meeting any of the criteria of 448: 87: 559:
Of course, lack of sources isn't a reason for deletion but the subject clearly has not recieved
512: 425: 373: 353: 333: 298: 262: 237: 206: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
709:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
443:
I have changed my opinion to "weak keep". Though I don't think the subject clearly satisfies
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
476: 388: 202: 158: 460: 433: 563:
coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, thus failing
571:, or making any claim of research or academic credentials. I urge the creator to review 691: 568: 293: 218: 57: 687: 576: 564: 491: 452: 444: 403: 214: 79: 71: 508: 369: 349: 329: 289: 117: 536:
Navidi frequently appears as a keynote speaker and panelist all over the world
456: 429: 479:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
391:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
487: 399: 550:- Unreferenced list of television appearances linked only to channels 507:
it's simply a curriculum of a person who appeared sometimes on TV. --
703:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
538:- one reference to an AXA roadshow where she was a guest speaker 346:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
113: 109: 105: 177: 524:
This Knowledge article is specifically mentioned in
486:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 398:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 366:
list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions
288:has pointed out below in this AfD discussion that 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 717:). No further edits should be made to this page. 56:demonstrate sufficient coverage for notability. 52:. The consensus is that the links provided by 191: 8: 364:Note: This debate has been included in the 344:Note: This debate has been included in the 326:list of Germany-related deletion discussions 324:Note: This debate has been included in the 363: 343: 323: 7: 637:Der Westen - Die Schöne und das Geld 686:. Good enough to get her over the 24: 453:interpreting the rules generously 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 624:DLDwomen Magazine at issuu.com 1: 632:(Larry Parks bio on page 3) 594:, hardly know the person. 209:. Main article contributor 734: 695:09:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 654:17:07, 20 April 2013 (UTC) 604:16:36, 19 April 2013 (UTC) 585:15:47, 17 April 2013 (UTC) 517:11:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC) 496:10:59, 14 April 2013 (UTC) 465:23:51, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 378:01:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 358:01:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 338:01:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC) 313:20:50, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 259:more talk with the creator 252:14:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 227:11:23, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 207:vehicle for self-promotion 66:15:57, 23 April 2013 (UTC) 438:23:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC) 408:20:21, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 277:11:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC) 205:, but Knowledge is not a 706:Please do not modify it. 682:, per links supplied by 629:Interview by Larry Parks 32:Please do not modify it. 215:single-purpose account 690:line in my opinion. 671:few or no other edits 673:outside this topic. 674: 498: 410: 380: 360: 340: 261:on my talk page. 725: 708: 656: 579: 549: 543: 537: 485: 481: 428:were removed. -- 397: 393: 310: 309: 303: 290:reliable sources 284:Article creator 274: 273: 267: 249: 248: 242: 196: 195: 181: 133: 121: 103: 48:The result was 34: 733: 732: 728: 727: 726: 724: 723: 722: 721: 715:deletion review 704: 684:User:Whytestone 577: 573:WP:NOTPROMOTION 547: 541: 535: 474: 386: 307: 306: 299: 286:user:Whytestone 271: 270: 263: 246: 245: 238: 211:User:Whytestone 138: 129: 94: 78: 75: 54:user:Whytestone 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 731: 729: 720: 719: 699: 698: 676: 675: 641: 640: 634: 626: 620: 619: 607: 606: 588: 587: 557: 553: 552: 551: 545: 544:- no reference 539: 530: 529: 519: 501: 500: 499: 483: 482: 471: 470: 469: 468: 467: 413: 412: 411: 395: 394: 383: 382: 381: 361: 341: 320: 319: 318: 317: 316: 315: 301:Blue Rasberry 265:Blue Rasberry 240:Blue Rasberry 199: 198: 135: 74: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 730: 718: 716: 712: 707: 701: 700: 696: 693: 689: 685: 681: 678: 677: 672: 668: 664: 660: 655: 651: 647: 643: 642: 638: 635: 633: 630: 627: 625: 622: 621: 616: 612: 609: 608: 605: 601: 597: 596:108.12.134.72 593: 590: 589: 586: 583: 582: 580: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 546: 540: 534: 533: 532: 531: 527: 523: 520: 518: 514: 510: 506: 503: 502: 497: 493: 489: 484: 480: 478: 473: 472: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 441: 440: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 418: 415: 414: 409: 405: 401: 396: 392: 390: 385: 384: 379: 375: 371: 367: 362: 359: 355: 351: 347: 342: 339: 335: 331: 327: 322: 321: 314: 311: 304: 302: 295: 291: 287: 283: 280: 279: 278: 275: 268: 266: 260: 256: 255: 254: 253: 250: 243: 241: 235: 231: 230: 229: 228: 224: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 194: 190: 187: 184: 180: 176: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 144: 141: 140:Find sources: 136: 132: 128: 125: 119: 115: 111: 107: 102: 98: 93: 89: 85: 81: 80:Sandra Navidi 77: 76: 73: 72:Sandra Navidi 70: 68: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 705: 702: 679: 614: 610: 591: 575: 560: 521: 504: 475: 421: 420: 416: 387: 300: 281: 264: 239: 233: 232: 201:Basically a 200: 188: 182: 174: 167: 161: 155: 149: 139: 126: 49: 47: 31: 28: 669:) has made 561:significant 449:WP:Academic 165:free images 659:Whytestone 646:Whytestone 426:peacockery 711:talk page 692:Lankiveil 417:Weak keep 370:• Gene93k 350:• Gene93k 330:• Gene93k 257:There is 219:bender235 58:Thryduulf 37:talk page 713:or in a 667:contribs 639:(German) 618:section) 578:Jebus989 477:Relisted 389:Relisted 124:View log 39:or in a 615:notable 569:WP:PROF 509:Vituzzu 294:WP:NBIO 171:WP refs 159:scholar 97:protect 92:history 688:WP:GNG 592:Delete 565:WP:BIO 522:Delete 505:Delete 445:WP:GNG 422:Delete 308:(talk) 272:(talk) 247:(talk) 234:Delete 203:resume 143:Google 101:delete 457:Boson 430:Boson 213:is a 186:JSTOR 147:books 131:Stats 118:views 110:watch 106:links 16:< 680:Keep 663:talk 650:talk 611:Keep 600:talk 526:this 513:talk 492:talk 461:talk 455:. -- 434:talk 404:talk 374:talk 354:talk 334:talk 282:Keep 223:talk 179:FENS 153:news 114:logs 88:talk 84:edit 62:talk 50:keep 488:KTC 400:KTC 193:TWL 122:– ( 665:• 657:— 652:) 602:) 515:) 494:) 463:) 436:) 419:. 406:) 376:) 368:. 356:) 348:. 336:) 328:. 225:) 217:. 173:) 116:| 112:| 108:| 104:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 64:) 697:. 661:( 648:( 598:( 511:( 490:( 459:( 432:( 402:( 372:( 352:( 332:( 221:( 197:) 189:· 183:· 175:· 168:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 145:( 137:( 134:) 127:· 120:) 82:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
user:Whytestone
Thryduulf
talk
15:57, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Sandra Navidi
Sandra Navidi
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
resume

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.