197:- being unreferenced is not a reason for deletion. Note that the article, to this point, has not been tagged as needing references. I've now marked it with {{unref}}. The article does make an assertion of notability as being voted Home and Gardens DIY Mum of the Year, as well as being an author. A search through Google News indicates that she has received coverage from multiple indpendent reliable sources though the articles now have slipped behind pay walls. See this
198:
113:
189:
201:. As such, it appears that sources do exist (within a physical library) to find provide sources, establish notability and meet verifiability requirements. --
153:. Google News Archive shows a couple of Oz profiles but behind paywalls. If other sources could be found, just possible. Otherwise, NN author/website owner. --
169:
If 6+ months of the article existence it can't get beyond two lines, she can't be notable.(What year did she win that award in anyway? 2121 CE ?)
86:
81:
90:
17:
73:
266:
36:
265:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
248:
234:
205:
186:
173:
161:
145:
132:
55:
77:
69:
61:
170:
158:
52:
244:- there may actually be reliable sources. Did you check the Gneews results I posted above? --
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
218:
182:
154:
125:
213:. So she won an award. Millions of people win awards, but where are the multiple
129:
121:
107:
245:
202:
142:
217:
reliable third party sources about this person? Oh, there aren't any?
259:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
Non-notable person. No claim of notability, no coverage in
103:
99:
95:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
269:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
181:no assertion of notability, no cites, per
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
141:nn. The "award" isn't enough.
1:
249:20:59, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
235:20:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
206:14:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
190:01:32, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
174:00:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
162:03:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
146:02:59, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
133:22:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
56:17:18, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
286:
262:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
122:secondary sources
277:
264:
231:
228:
225:
222:
187:Bearian'sBooties
111:
93:
48:
34:
285:
284:
280:
279:
278:
276:
275:
274:
273:
267:deletion review
260:
229:
226:
223:
220:
84:
68:
65:
46:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
283:
281:
272:
271:
254:
252:
251:
238:
237:
208:
192:
176:
164:
148:
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
282:
270:
268:
263:
257:
256:
255:
250:
247:
243:
240:
239:
236:
233:
232:
216:
212:
209:
207:
204:
200:
196:
193:
191:
188:
184:
180:
179:Speedy delete
177:
175:
172:
168:
165:
163:
160:
156:
152:
149:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
127:
123:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:Sandra Broman
67:
66:
63:
62:Sandra Broman
60:
58:
57:
54:
53:Mailer Diablo
50:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
261:
258:
253:
241:
219:
214:
210:
199:Gnews search
194:
178:
166:
150:
138:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
215:non-trivial
151:Weak delete
124:. Fails
171:jonathon
155:Dhartung
114:View log
242:Comment
130:Valrith
87:protect
82:history
211:Delete
183:WP:BLP
167:Delete
139:Delete
126:WP:BIO
91:delete
108:views
100:watch
96:links
49:elete
16:<
246:Whpq
203:Whpq
195:Keep
159:Talk
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
51:. -
227:sau
221:Bur
143:JJL
112:– (
230:ce
224:nt
185:.
157:|
128:.
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
116:)
110:)
72:(
47:d
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.