Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Sandworm (Dune) - Knowledge

Source 📝

520: 399: 403: 245:
series, but not related to the fictional creature itself. With no reliable secondary sources that provide analytic or evaluative claims about the fictional creature itself, I do not believe that the fictional Sandworm as a topic deserves a stand-alone article and therefore the article should be
218:
as a stand-alone topic since it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Most of the sources cited within the article are from primary sources or non-independent sources. The few ones that are reliable secondary sources do not talk about the
580:
Notability sources are more than sufficient. I am afraid that I must disagree completely with the suggestion that there is "enough" description in the Glossary; there is almost nothing there, in relation to the role which the sandworms play in Dune's ecology and in relation to the Fremen.
176: 518:
template that is such an ineffective search parameter... specially when a bit of sense gives us "Sandworm, Frank Herbert" and provides us so very much more... with the sandworm creature reciving mention and analysis in multiple
448:, and more. Sandworms are generally not the central feature of these treatises, but are discussed non-trivially in a couple I sampled. By my clock, that looks like 10 minutes of research since I posted the above. 291: 170: 271: 331: 495:." In other words, it is saying that it is quite reasonable that we should cover this topic. The way in which we do this is therefore a matter of ordinary editing, not deletion. 231:
does not show significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that provide information beyond the plot, just unreliable sources and/or primary sources such as the novel
371: 311: 131: 77: 351: 445: 441: 437: 429: 421: 406:, and that's just the first two pages of Google Books, which are dominated by the primary fiction sources themselves. Back with Scholar in a few... 191: 158: 136: 104: 99: 152: 108: 148: 91: 395: 17: 198: 164: 492: 251: 611: 535: 40: 568: 500: 491:
The nomination destroys its own logic at the end when it says "The creature already has enough description in
425: 592: 572: 555: 538: 504: 483: 457: 415: 383: 363: 343: 323: 303: 283: 263: 61: 607: 36: 589: 528: 95: 57: 564: 496: 184: 237:, but nothing about reception or significance in the real world, making the article the article a 453: 411: 551: 233: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
606:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
379: 359: 339: 319: 299: 279: 259: 208: 582: 87: 67: 53: 238: 224: 523: 480: 449: 407: 228: 215: 547: 125: 375: 355: 335: 315: 295: 275: 255: 247: 522:
As a fictional plot device used in multiple novels, the sandworm easily meets
433: 227:, so those sources do not show notability for the fictional creature. A quick 468: 246:
deleted since it does meet the notability guidelines and falls into what
394:
Dune Sandworms are covered in enough independent RS to meet the GNG:
600:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
292:
list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions
272:
list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
121: 117: 113: 183: 546:
based on a perfunctory review of the sources found.
332:
list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions
241:with a few mentions about the significance of the 467:. An important aspect in the entire Dune series. 250:. The creature already has enough description in 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 614:). No further edits should be made to this page. 372:list of Television-related deletion discussions 312:list of Literature-related deletion discussions 197: 8: 370:Note: This debate has been included in the 350:Note: This debate has been included in the 330:Note: This debate has been included in the 310:Note: This debate has been included in the 290:Note: This debate has been included in the 270:Note: This debate has been included in the 369: 349: 329: 309: 289: 269: 352:list of Film-related deletion discussions 207:The fictional creature Sandworm from the 514:I really hate it when an AFD creates a 75: 404:a reference in a commentary on Avatar 78:Articles for deletion/Sandworm (Dune) 7: 74: 24: 219:fictional creature but about the 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 493:Glossary of Dune terminology 252:Glossary of Dune terminology 216:general notability guideline 420:Scholar references include 225:notability is not inherited 631: 214:does not seem to meet the 593:04:30, 26 July 2012 (UTC) 573:20:05, 25 July 2012 (UTC) 556:21:57, 24 July 2012 (UTC) 539:09:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 505:07:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 484:07:13, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 458:06:37, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 416:06:28, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 384:06:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 364:06:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 344:06:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 324:06:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 304:06:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 284:06:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 264:06:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC) 62:12:57, 28 July 2012 (UTC) 603:Please do not modify it. 239:summary-only description 32:Please do not modify it. 73:AfDs for this article: 248:what Knowledge is not 396:The Science of Dune 229:search engine test 48:The result was 400:The BBook of Geek 386: 366: 346: 326: 306: 286: 234:Sandworms of Dune 88:Sandworm (Dune)‎‎ 68:Sandworm (Dune)‎‎ 622: 605: 586: 531: 477: 474: 471: 202: 201: 187: 139: 129: 111: 34: 630: 629: 625: 624: 623: 621: 620: 619: 618: 612:deletion review 601: 584: 529: 475: 472: 469: 144: 135: 102: 86: 83: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 628: 626: 617: 616: 596: 595: 575: 565:Qwertyuiop1994 558: 541: 508: 507: 486: 462: 461: 460: 388: 387: 367: 347: 327: 307: 287: 205: 204: 141: 82: 81: 80: 72: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 627: 615: 613: 609: 604: 598: 597: 594: 591: 588: 587: 579: 576: 574: 570: 566: 563:as per above 562: 559: 557: 553: 549: 545: 542: 540: 537: 536: 533: 532: 525: 521: 517: 513: 510: 509: 506: 502: 498: 494: 490: 487: 485: 482: 478: 466: 463: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 418: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 390: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 368: 365: 361: 357: 353: 348: 345: 341: 337: 333: 328: 325: 321: 317: 313: 308: 305: 301: 297: 293: 288: 285: 281: 277: 273: 268: 267: 266: 265: 261: 257: 253: 249: 244: 240: 236: 235: 230: 226: 222: 217: 213: 211: 200: 196: 193: 190: 186: 182: 178: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 150: 147: 146:Find sources: 142: 138: 133: 127: 123: 119: 115: 110: 106: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 84: 79: 76: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 602: 599: 583: 577: 560: 543: 534: 527: 515: 511: 488: 464: 391: 242: 232: 223:series, and 220: 209: 206: 194: 188: 180: 173: 167: 161: 155: 145: 49: 47: 31: 28: 516:findsources 171:free images 585:David_FLXD 54:Tom Morris 608:talk page 212:franchise 37:talk page 610:or in a 530:Schmidt, 519:sources. 450:Jclemens 408:Jclemens 132:View log 39:or in a 548:Bearian 177:WP refs 165:scholar 105:protect 100:history 590:(Talk) 524:WP:GNG 497:Warden 376:Jfgslo 356:Jfgslo 336:Jfgslo 316:Jfgslo 296:Jfgslo 276:Jfgslo 256:Jfgslo 149:Google 109:delete 192:JSTOR 153:books 137:Stats 126:views 118:watch 114:links 16:< 578:Keep 569:talk 561:Keep 552:talk 544:Keep 512:Keep 501:talk 489:Keep 481:Talk 465:Keep 454:talk 412:talk 392:Keep 380:talk 360:talk 340:talk 320:talk 300:talk 280:talk 260:talk 243:Dune 221:Dune 210:Dune 185:FENS 159:news 122:logs 96:talk 92:edit 58:talk 50:keep 526:. 199:TWL 134:• 130:– ( 52:. — 571:) 554:) 503:) 479:| 456:) 444:, 440:, 436:, 432:, 428:, 424:, 414:) 402:, 398:, 382:) 374:. 362:) 354:. 342:) 334:. 322:) 314:. 302:) 294:. 282:) 274:. 262:) 254:. 179:) 124:| 120:| 116:| 112:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 60:) 567:( 550:( 499:( 476:P 473:I 470:J 452:( 446:7 442:6 438:5 434:4 430:3 426:2 422:1 410:( 378:( 358:( 338:( 318:( 298:( 278:( 258:( 203:) 195:· 189:· 181:· 174:· 168:· 162:· 156:· 151:( 143:( 140:) 128:) 90:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Tom Morris
talk
12:57, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
Sandworm (Dune)‎‎
Articles for deletion/Sandworm (Dune)
Sandworm (Dune)‎‎
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Dune franchise

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.